summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/target-arm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2013-06-27 16:38:47 +0100
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2013-07-15 17:13:51 +0100
commit2ebcebe262e88111ff583f97bc5fe0aae64b8940 (patch)
treeca9d53c5d33dfa34136f15de159addf12b8544d3 /target-arm
parent204a9c43afb92e2ff44fc9d1d377bc98ee97e3d7 (diff)
downloadqemu-2ebcebe262e88111ff583f97bc5fe0aae64b8940.tar.gz
qemu-2ebcebe262e88111ff583f97bc5fe0aae64b8940.tar.bz2
qemu-2ebcebe262e88111ff583f97bc5fe0aae64b8940.zip
target-arm: avoid undefined behaviour when writing TTBCR
LPAE CPUs have more potentially valid bits in the TTBCR, and so the simple masking out of invalid bits is no longer sufficient to obtain the base address width field of the register, which is what we use to precalculate c2_mask and c2_base_mask. Explicitly extract the relevant register field rather than simply shifting by the register value. This bug would have had no ill effects in practice, since if the EAE bit (TTBCR bit 31) is set then we don't use the precalculated masks, and if EAE is zero then bits 30..3 are all UNK/SBZP, so well-behaved guests won't set them. However the shift is undefined behaviour, so we should avoid it. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 1372347527-4428-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Diffstat (limited to 'target-arm')
-rw-r--r--target-arm/helper.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
index b7c926db18..57fa8c85b8 100644
--- a/target-arm/helper.c
+++ b/target-arm/helper.c
@@ -891,6 +891,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo pmsav5_cp_reginfo[] = {
static int vmsa_ttbcr_raw_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
uint64_t value)
{
+ int maskshift = extract32(value, 0, 3);
+
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_LPAE)) {
value &= ~((7 << 19) | (3 << 14) | (0xf << 3));
} else {
@@ -902,8 +904,8 @@ static int vmsa_ttbcr_raw_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
* and the c2_mask and c2_base_mask values are meaningless.
*/
env->cp15.c2_control = value;
- env->cp15.c2_mask = ~(((uint32_t)0xffffffffu) >> value);
- env->cp15.c2_base_mask = ~((uint32_t)0x3fffu >> value);
+ env->cp15.c2_mask = ~(((uint32_t)0xffffffffu) >> maskshift);
+ env->cp15.c2_base_mask = ~((uint32_t)0x3fffu >> maskshift);
return 0;
}