summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>2015-07-26 23:42:53 -0400
committerJohn Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>2015-07-26 23:42:53 -0400
commitd2ff85854512574e7209f295e87b0835d5b032c6 (patch)
tree9fba823cb661266b430e52912111e8460c1de9d7
parentf793d97e454a56d17e404004867985622ca1a63b (diff)
downloadqemu-d2ff85854512574e7209f295e87b0835d5b032c6.tar.gz
qemu-d2ff85854512574e7209f295e87b0835d5b032c6.tar.bz2
qemu-d2ff85854512574e7209f295e87b0835d5b032c6.zip
ide: Check array bounds before writing to io_buffer (CVE-2015-5154)
If the end_transfer_func of a command is called because enough data has been read or written for the current PIO transfer, and it fails to correctly call the command completion functions, the DRQ bit in the status register and s->end_transfer_func may remain set. This allows the guest to access further bytes in s->io_buffer beyond s->data_end, and eventually overflowing the io_buffer. One case where this currently happens is emulation of the ATAPI command START STOP UNIT. This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit array bounds checks before accessing the buffer instead of relying on end_transfer_func to function correctly. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--hw/ide/core.c16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index 122e955084..44fcc234b2 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -2021,6 +2021,10 @@ void ide_data_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 2 > s->data_end) {
+ return;
+ }
+
*(uint16_t *)p = le16_to_cpu(val);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2042,6 +2046,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readw(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 2 > s->data_end) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = cpu_to_le16(*(uint16_t *)p);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2063,6 +2071,10 @@ void ide_data_writel(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 4 > s->data_end) {
+ return;
+ }
+
*(uint32_t *)p = le32_to_cpu(val);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2084,6 +2096,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 4 > s->data_end) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)p);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;