Initial commit for TizenHEADsubmit/2.0alpha/20130201.014617accepted/2.0alpha/20130201.0121062.0alpha

1 files changed, 272 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sha1-lookup.c b/sha1-lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4dc55d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sha1-lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
+#include "cache.h"
+#include "sha1-lookup.h"
+
+static uint32_t take2(const unsigned char *sha1)
+{
+	return ((sha1[0] << 8) | sha1[1]);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Conventional binary search loop looks like this:
+ *
+ *      do {
+ *              int mi = (lo + hi) / 2;
+ *              int cmp = "entry pointed at by mi" minus "target";
+ *              if (!cmp)
+ *                      return (mi is the wanted one)
+ *              if (cmp > 0)
+ *                      hi = mi; "mi is larger than target"
+ *              else
+ *                      lo = mi+1; "mi is smaller than target"
+ *      } while (lo < hi);
+ *
+ * The invariants are:
+ *
+ * - When entering the loop, lo points at a slot that is never
+ *   above the target (it could be at the target), hi points at a
+ *   slot that is guaranteed to be above the target (it can never
+ *   be at the target).
+ *
+ * - We find a point 'mi' between lo and hi (mi could be the same
+ *   as lo, but never can be the same as hi), and check if it hits
+ *   the target.  There are three cases:
+ *
+ *    - if it is a hit, we are happy.
+ *
+ *    - if it is strictly higher than the target, we update hi with
+ *      it.
+ *
+ *    - if it is strictly lower than the target, we update lo to be
+ *      one slot after it, because we allow lo to be at the target.
+ *
+ * When choosing 'mi', we do not have to take the "middle" but
+ * anywhere in between lo and hi, as long as lo <= mi < hi is
+ * satisfied.  When we somehow know that the distance between the
+ * target and lo is much shorter than the target and hi, we could
+ * pick mi that is much closer to lo than the midway.
+ */
+/*
+ * The table should contain "nr" elements.
+ * The sha1 of element i (between 0 and nr - 1) should be returned
+ * by "fn(i, table)".
+ */
+int sha1_pos(const unsigned char *sha1, void *table, size_t nr,
+	     sha1_access_fn fn)
+{
+	size_t hi = nr;
+	size_t lo = 0;
+	size_t mi = 0;
+
+	if (!nr)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (nr != 1) {
+		size_t lov, hiv, miv, ofs;
+
+		for (ofs = 0; ofs < 18; ofs += 2) {
+			lov = take2(fn(0, table) + ofs);
+			hiv = take2(fn(nr - 1, table) + ofs);
+			miv = take2(sha1 + ofs);
+			if (miv < lov)
+				return -1;
+			if (hiv < miv)
+				return -1 - nr;
+			if (lov != hiv) {
+				/*
+				 * At this point miv could be equal
+				 * to hiv (but sha1 could still be higher);
+				 * the invariant of (mi < hi) should be
+				 * kept.
+				 */
+				mi = (nr - 1) * (miv - lov) / (hiv - lov);
+				if (lo <= mi && mi < hi)
+					break;
+				die("BUG: assertion failed in binary search");
+			}
+		}
+		if (18 <= ofs)
+			die("cannot happen -- lo and hi are identical");
+	}
+
+	do {
+		int cmp;
+		cmp = hashcmp(fn(mi, table), sha1);
+		if (!cmp)
+			return mi;
+		if (cmp > 0)
+			hi = mi;
+		else
+			lo = mi + 1;
+		mi = (hi + lo) / 2;
+	} while (lo < hi);
+	return -lo-1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Conventional binary search loop looks like this:
+ *
+ *	unsigned lo, hi;
+ *      do {
+ *              unsigned mi = (lo + hi) / 2;
+ *              int cmp = "entry pointed at by mi" minus "target";
+ *              if (!cmp)
+ *                      return (mi is the wanted one)
+ *              if (cmp > 0)
+ *                      hi = mi; "mi is larger than target"
+ *              else
+ *                      lo = mi+1; "mi is smaller than target"
+ *      } while (lo < hi);
+ *
+ * The invariants are:
+ *
+ * - When entering the loop, lo points at a slot that is never
+ *   above the target (it could be at the target), hi points at a
+ *   slot that is guaranteed to be above the target (it can never
+ *   be at the target).
+ *
+ * - We find a point 'mi' between lo and hi (mi could be the same
+ *   as lo, but never can be as same as hi), and check if it hits
+ *   the target.  There are three cases:
+ *
+ *    - if it is a hit, we are happy.
+ *
+ *    - if it is strictly higher than the target, we set it to hi,
+ *      and repeat the search.
+ *
+ *    - if it is strictly lower than the target, we update lo to
+ *      one slot after it, because we allow lo to be at the target.
+ *
+ *   If the loop exits, there is no matching entry.
+ *
+ * When choosing 'mi', we do not have to take the "middle" but
+ * anywhere in between lo and hi, as long as lo <= mi < hi is
+ * satisfied.  When we somehow know that the distance between the
+ * target and lo is much shorter than the target and hi, we could
+ * pick mi that is much closer to lo than the midway.
+ *
+ * Now, we can take advantage of the fact that SHA-1 is a good hash
+ * function, and as long as there are enough entries in the table, we
+ * can expect uniform distribution.  An entry that begins with for
+ * example "deadbeef..." is much likely to appear much later than in
+ * the midway of the table.  It can reasonably be expected to be near
+ * 87% (222/256) from the top of the table.
+ *
+ * However, we do not want to pick "mi" too precisely.  If the entry at
+ * the 87% in the above example turns out to be higher than the target
+ * we are looking for, we would end up narrowing the search space down
+ * only by 13%, instead of 50% we would get if we did a simple binary
+ * search.  So we would want to hedge our bets by being less aggressive.
+ *
+ * The table at "table" holds at least "nr" entries of "elem_size"
+ * bytes each.  Each entry has the SHA-1 key at "key_offset".  The
+ * table is sorted by the SHA-1 key of the entries.  The caller wants
+ * to find the entry with "key", and knows that the entry at "lo" is
+ * not higher than the entry it is looking for, and that the entry at
+ * "hi" is higher than the entry it is looking for.
+ */
+int sha1_entry_pos(const void *table,
+		   size_t elem_size,
+		   size_t key_offset,
+		   unsigned lo, unsigned hi, unsigned nr,
+		   const unsigned char *key)
+{
+	const unsigned char *base = table;
+	const unsigned char *hi_key, *lo_key;
+	unsigned ofs_0;
+	static int debug_lookup = -1;
+
+	if (debug_lookup < 0)
+		debug_lookup = !!getenv("GIT_DEBUG_LOOKUP");
+
+	if (!nr || lo >= hi)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (nr == hi)
+		hi_key = NULL;
+	else
+		hi_key = base + elem_size * hi + key_offset;
+	lo_key = base + elem_size * lo + key_offset;
+
+	ofs_0 = 0;
+	do {
+		int cmp;
+		unsigned ofs, mi, range;
+		unsigned lov, hiv, kyv;
+		const unsigned char *mi_key;
+
+		range = hi - lo;
+		if (hi_key) {
+			for (ofs = ofs_0; ofs < 20; ofs++)
+				if (lo_key[ofs] != hi_key[ofs])
+					break;
+			ofs_0 = ofs;
+			/*
+			 * byte 0 thru (ofs-1) are the same between
+			 * lo and hi; ofs is the first byte that is
+			 * different.
+			 */
+			hiv = hi_key[ofs_0];
+			if (ofs_0 < 19)
+				hiv = (hiv << 8) | hi_key[ofs_0+1];
+		} else {
+			hiv = 256;
+			if (ofs_0 < 19)
+				hiv <<= 8;
+		}
+		lov = lo_key[ofs_0];
+		kyv = key[ofs_0];
+		if (ofs_0 < 19) {
+			lov = (lov << 8) | lo_key[ofs_0+1];
+			kyv = (kyv << 8) | key[ofs_0+1];
+		}
+		assert(lov < hiv);
+
+		if (kyv < lov)
+			return -1 - lo;
+		if (hiv < kyv)
+			return -1 - hi;
+
+		/*
+		 * Even if we know the target is much closer to 'hi'
+		 * than 'lo', if we pick too precisely and overshoot
+		 * (e.g. when we know 'mi' is closer to 'hi' than to
+		 * 'lo', pick 'mi' that is higher than the target), we
+		 * end up narrowing the search space by a smaller
+		 * amount (i.e. the distance between 'mi' and 'hi')
+		 * than what we would have (i.e. about half of 'lo'
+		 * and 'hi').  Hedge our bets to pick 'mi' less
+		 * aggressively, i.e. make 'mi' a bit closer to the
+		 * middle than we would otherwise pick.
+		 */
+		kyv = (kyv * 6 + lov + hiv) / 8;
+		if (lov < hiv - 1) {
+			if (kyv == lov)
+				kyv++;
+			else if (kyv == hiv)
+				kyv--;
+		}
+		mi = (range - 1) * (kyv - lov) / (hiv - lov) + lo;
+
+		if (debug_lookup) {
+			printf("lo %u hi %u rg %u mi %u ", lo, hi, range, mi);
+			printf("ofs %u lov %x, hiv %x, kyv %x\n",
+			       ofs_0, lov, hiv, kyv);
+		}
+		if (!(lo <= mi && mi < hi))
+			die("assertion failure lo %u mi %u hi %u %s",
+			    lo, mi, hi, sha1_to_hex(key));
+
+		mi_key = base + elem_size * mi + key_offset;
+		cmp = memcmp(mi_key + ofs_0, key + ofs_0, 20 - ofs_0);
+		if (!cmp)
+			return mi;
+		if (cmp > 0) {
+			hi = mi;
+			hi_key = mi_key;
+		} else {
+			lo = mi + 1;
+			lo_key = mi_key + elem_size;
+		}
+	} while (lo < hi);
+	return -lo-1;
+}