blob: 448050eda6cf17cfbde379a1f2d8c0ecd4cbaaab (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
>I just found an odd little bug in rpm 2.5, when there is something like
>
>%doc readme
>
>in the %files list, then if readme doesn't exit, rpm will just put an empty
>doc directory in the package.
option to %setup to *not* do chown/chgrp/chmod
> Most of my spec files have empty Distribution: and Vendor: tag because I
> really don't care. Now, empty tags are frowned upon. So, I try to comment
> out the lines and get a funny error message:
>
> Distribution field must be present in package: solaris2.6
> Vendor field must be present in package: solaris2.6
>
> This happens to be my value of 'Build Os' which gets into the error message!
posix %attr
some /foo/*/*.foo entries don't get matches
detect multiple summary/description entries
verify langs
remove prefix stuff from files.c (not used anymore)
i18n strings
=====================================================================
triggers
custom find-requires, find-provides
messages (normal, verbose, debug)
deprecate require_distribution, require_icon, require_vendor
deprecate RPMVAR_ROOT, and the RPMVAR_REQUIRE* stuff above
|
