diff options
author | Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com> | 2002-03-18 16:14:04 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com> | 2002-03-18 16:14:04 +0000 |
commit | fb0ff88f8f9acdaf3eae3d368d79f7676ccddb7d (patch) | |
tree | 2bd9f055fe504f6cfcd54bf75841e91394d0415c /gdb/doc | |
parent | 9bb0a4d8dfbb8ba68e04b4963b3c1bdc46777c09 (diff) | |
download | binutils-fb0ff88f8f9acdaf3eae3d368d79f7676ccddb7d.tar.gz binutils-fb0ff88f8f9acdaf3eae3d368d79f7676ccddb7d.tar.bz2 binutils-fb0ff88f8f9acdaf3eae3d368d79f7676ccddb7d.zip |
* gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Add section ``Versions and
Branches''.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/doc')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/doc/ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo | 100 |
2 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog index 71c1ddf55cb..73951d78c80 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2002-03-18 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> + * gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Add section ``Versions and + Branches''. + +2002-03-18 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> + * gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Add the section``Branch Commit Policy''. diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo index 5f5f93692cc..9a47976cde4 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo +++ b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo @@ -4817,11 +4817,111 @@ files @file{gdb.info*} in the distribution. Note the plural; @code{makeinfo} will split the document into one overall file and five or so included files. + @node Releasing GDB @chapter Releasing @value{GDBN} @cindex making a new release of gdb +@section Versions and Branches + +@subsection Version Identifiers + +@value{GDBN}'s version is determined by the file @file{gdb/version.in}. + +@value{GDBN}'s mainline uses ISO dates to differentiate between +versions. The CVS repository uses @var{YYYY}-@var{MM}-@var{DD}-cvs +while the corresponding snapshot uses @var{YYYYMMDD}. + +@value{GDBN}'s release branch uses a slightly more complicated scheme. +When the branch is first cut, the mainline version identifier is +prefixed with the @var{major}.@var{minor} from of the previous release +series but with .90 appended. As draft releases are drawn from the +branch, the minor minor number (.90) is incremented. Once the first +release (@var{M}.@var{N}) has been made, the version prefix is updated +to @var{M}.@var{N}.0.90 (dot zero, dot ninety). Follow on releases have +an incremented minor minor version number (.0). + +Using 5.1 (previous) and 5.2 (current), the example below illustrates a +typical sequence of version identifiers: + +@table @asis +@item 5.1.1 +final release from previous branch +@item 2002-03-03-cvs +main-line the day the branch is cut +@item 5.1.90-2002-03-03-cvs +corresponding branch version +@item 5.1.91 +first draft release candidate +@item 5.1.91-2002-03-17-cvs +updated branch version +@item 5.1.92 +second draft release candidate +@item 5.1.92-2002-03-31-cvs +updated branch version +@item 5.1.93 +final release candidate (see below) +@item 5.2 +official release +@item 5.2.0.90-2002-04-07-cvs +updated CVS branch version +@item 5.2.1 +second official release +@end table + +Notes: + +@itemize @bullet +@item +Minor minor minor draft release candidates such as 5.2.0.91 have been +omitted from the example. Such release candidates are, typically, never +made. +@item +For 5.1.93 the bziped tar ball @file{gdb-5.1.93.tar.bz2} is just the +official @file{gdb-5.2.tar} renamed and compressed. +@end itemize + +To avoid version conflicts, vendors are expected to modify the file +@file{gdb/version.in} to include a vendor unique alphabetic identifier +(an official @value{GDBN} release never uses alphabetic characters in +its version identifer). + +Since @value{GDBN} does not make minor minor minor releases (e.g., +5.1.0.1) the conflict between that and a minor minor draft release +identifier (e.g., 5.1.0.90) is avoided. + + +@subsection Branches + +@value{GDBN} draws a release series (5.2, 5.2.1, @dots{}) from a single +release branch (gdb_5_2-branch). Since minor minor minor releases +(5.1.0.1) are not made, the need to branch the release branch is avoided +(it also turns out that the effort required for such a a branch and +release is significantly greater than the effort needed to create a new +release from the head of the release branch). + +Releases 5.0 and 5.1 used branch and release tags of the form: + +@example +gdb_N_M-YYYY-MM-DD-branchpoint +gdb_N_M-YYYY-MM-DD-branch +gdb_M_N-YYYY-MM-DD-release +@end example + +Release 5.2 is trialing the branch and release tags: + +@example +gdb_N_M-YYYY-MM-DD-branchpoint +gdb_N_M-branch +gdb_M_N-YYYY-MM-DD-release +@end example + +@emph{Pragmatics: The branchpoint and release tags need to identify when +a branch and release are made. The branch tag, denoting the head of the +branch, does not have this criteria.} + + @section Branch Commit Policy The branch commit policy is pretty slack. @value{GDBN} releases 5.0, |