summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/board/ti
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>2022-12-13 11:57:34 +0530
committerTom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>2023-01-02 16:06:07 -0500
commit9f393a2d7af89fa1be076e79091e5481f96c3c3f (patch)
tree17db2acf50c666656606c8e5009ad7241f663ea7 /board/ti
parent357c352cdccbd09a92924b1a5c0cb841a18aa832 (diff)
downloadu-boot-9f393a2d7af89fa1be076e79091e5481f96c3c3f.tar.gz
u-boot-9f393a2d7af89fa1be076e79091e5481f96c3c3f.tar.bz2
u-boot-9f393a2d7af89fa1be076e79091e5481f96c3c3f.zip
board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for 2-byte
EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently different behaviours seen across boards as documented in commit bf6376642fe8 ("board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk"). Adding to the list, we see that there are 2-byte EEPROMs that read properly with 1-byte addressing with no offset. For ti_i2c_eeprom_am6_get where eeprom parse operation is dynamic, the earlier commit d2ab2a2bafd5 ("board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for AM6 style data") tried to resolve this by running ti_i2c_eeprom_get() twice. However this commit along with its former commit fails on J7 platforms where EEPROM successfully return back the header on 1-byte addressing and continues to do so until an offset is introduced. So the second read incorrectly determines the EEPROM as 1-byte addressing. A more generic solution is introduced here to solve this issue: 1-byte read without offset and 1-byte read with offset. If both passes, it follows 1-byte addressing else we proceed with 2-byte addressing check. Tested on J721E, J7200, DRA7xx, AM64x Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> Fixes: d2ab2a2bafd5 (board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for AM6 style data) Fixes: bf6376642fe8 (board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk) Tested-By: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'board/ti')
-rw-r--r--board/ti/common/board_detect.c46
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/board/ti/common/board_detect.c b/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
index c37629fe8a..9a53884c98 100644
--- a/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
+++ b/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
u32 header, u32 size, uint8_t *ep)
{
int rc;
+ uint8_t offset_test;
+ bool one_byte_addressing = true;
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C)
struct udevice *dev;
@@ -114,8 +116,23 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
*/
(void)dm_i2c_read(dev, 0, ep, size);
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != header)
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
+ * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
+ * on offsets. We perform an offset test to make sure it is not a 2 byte
+ * eeprom that works with 1 byte addressing but just without an offset
+ */
+
+ rc = dm_i2c_read(dev, 0x1, &offset_test, sizeof(offset_test));
+
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != (header & 0xFF))
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
/* Corrupted data??? */
- if (*((u32 *)ep) != header) {
+ if (!one_byte_addressing) {
/*
* read the eeprom header using i2c again, but use only a
* 2 byte address (some newer boards need this..)
@@ -151,8 +168,23 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
*/
(void)i2c_read(dev_addr, 0x0, byte, ep, size);
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != header)
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
+ * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
+ * on offsets. We perform an offset test to make sure it is not a 2 byte
+ * eeprom that works with 1 byte addressing but just without an offset
+ */
+
+ rc = i2c_read(dev_addr, 0x1, byte, &offset_test, sizeof(offset_test));
+
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != (header & 0xFF))
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
/* Corrupted data??? */
- if (*((u32 *)ep) != header) {
+ if (!one_byte_addressing) {
/*
* read the eeprom header using i2c again, but use only a
* 2 byte address (some newer boards need this..)
@@ -444,16 +476,6 @@ int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_am6_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
if (rc)
return rc;
- /*
- * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
- * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
- * on offsets. We re-read the board ID to ensure we have sane data back
- */
- rc = ti_i2c_eeprom_get(bus_addr, dev_addr, TI_EEPROM_HEADER_MAGIC,
- sizeof(board_id), (uint8_t *)&board_id);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
if (board_id.header.id != TI_AM6_EEPROM_RECORD_BOARD_ID) {
pr_err("%s: Invalid board ID record!\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;