diff options
author | Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com> | 2013-06-18 23:47:56 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-06-18 15:42:15 -0700 |
commit | 6007b1bd0f752a5c022f7944c65fb96c39d6db3d (patch) | |
tree | d0b3074fc8e0589603dbbe4ebc8a3b5c52287842 | |
parent | 056d83f3c30c398f14eb879f1d1707e3a7808f4a (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-6007b1bd0f752a5c022f7944c65fb96c39d6db3d.tar.gz linux-stable-6007b1bd0f752a5c022f7944c65fb96c39d6db3d.tar.bz2 linux-stable-6007b1bd0f752a5c022f7944c65fb96c39d6db3d.zip |
FMC: add a driver to write mezzanine EEPROM
This driver allows to reprogram the EEPROM in a mezzanine, to store
its own identifiers during manufacturing or to save other useful data.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Acked-by: Juan David Gonzalez Cobas <dcobas@cern.ch>
Acked-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.txt | 125 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/fmc/Kconfig | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/fmc/Makefile | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.c | 176 |
5 files changed, 313 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX b/Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX index c22d6873fd08..177c3e4a9511 100644 --- a/Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX @@ -30,3 +30,6 @@ fmc-fakedev.txt fmc-trivial.txt - about drivers/fmc/fmc-trivial.ko + +fmc-write-eeprom.txt + - about drivers/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.ko diff --git a/Documentation/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.txt b/Documentation/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..44a3bc678bf0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.txt @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +fmc-write-eeprom +================ + +This module is designed to load a binary file from /lib/firmware and to +write it to the internal EEPROM of the mezzanine card. This driver uses +the `busid' generic parameter. + +Overwriting the EEPROM is not something you should do daily, and it is +expected to only happen during manufacturing. For this reason, the +module makes it unlikely for the random user to change a working EEPROM. + +The module takes the following measures: + + * It accepts a `file=' argument (within /lib/firmware) and if no + such argument is received, it doesn't write anything to EEPROM + (i.e. there is no default file name). + + * If the file name ends with `.bin' it is written verbatim starting + at offset 0. + + * If the file name ends with `.tlv' it is interpreted as + type-length-value (i.e., it allows writev(2)-like operation). + + * If the file name doesn't match any of the patterns above, it is + ignored and no write is performed. + + * Only cards listed with `busid=' are written to. If no busid is + specified, no programming is done (and the probe function of the + driver will fail). + + +Each TLV tuple is formatted in this way: the header is 5 bytes, +followed by data. The first byte is `w' for write, the next two bytes +represent the address, in little-endian byte order, and the next two +represent the data length, in little-endian order. The length does not +include the header (it is the actual number of bytes to be written). + +This is a real example: that writes 5 bytes at position 0x110: + + spusa.root# od -t x1 -Ax /lib/firmware/try.tlv + 000000 77 10 01 05 00 30 31 32 33 34 + 00000a + spusa.root# insmod /tmp/fmc-write-eeprom.ko busid=0x0200 file=try.tlv + [19983.391498] spec 0000:03:00.0: write 5 bytes at 0x0110 + [19983.414615] spec 0000:03:00.0: write_eeprom: success + +Please note that you'll most likely want to use SDBFS to build your +EEPROM image, at least if your mezzanines are being used in the White +Rabbit environment. For this reason the TLV format is not expected to +be used much and is not expected to be developed further. + +If you want to try reflashing fake EEPROM devices, you can use the +fmc-fakedev.ko module (see *note fmc-fakedev::). Whenever you change +the image starting at offset 0, it will deregister and register again +after two seconds. Please note, however, that if fmc-write-eeprom is +still loaded, the system will associate it to the new device, which +will be reprogrammed and thus will be unloaded after two seconds. The +following example removes the module after it reflashed fakedev the +first time. + + spusa.root# insmod fmc-fakedev.ko + [ 72.984733] fake-fmc: Manufacturer: fake-vendor + [ 72.989434] fake-fmc: Product name: fake-design-for-testing + spusa.root# insmod fmc-write-eeprom.ko busid=0 file=fdelay-eeprom.bin; \ + rmmod fmc-write-eeprom + [ 130.874098] fake-fmc: Matching a generic driver (no ID) + [ 130.887845] fake-fmc: programming 6155 bytes + [ 130.894567] fake-fmc: write_eeprom: success + [ 132.895794] fake-fmc: Manufacturer: CERN + [ 132.899872] fake-fmc: Product name: FmcDelay1ns4cha + + +Writing to the EEPROM +===================== + +Once you have created a binary file for your EEPROM, you can write it +to the storage medium using the fmc-write-eeprom (See *note +fmc-write-eeprom::, while relying on a carrier driver. The procedure +here shown here uses the SPEC driver +(`http://www.ohwr.org/projects/spec-sw'). + +The example assumes no driver is already loaded (actually, I unloaded +them by hand as everything loads automatically at boot time after you +installed the modules), and shows kernel messages together with +commands. Here the prompt is spusa.root# and two SPEC cards are plugged +in the system. + + spusa.root# insmod fmc.ko + spusa.root# insmod spec.ko + [13972.382818] spec 0000:02:00.0: probe for device 0002:0000 + [13972.392773] spec 0000:02:00.0: got file "fmc/spec-init.bin", 1484404 (0x16a674) bytes + [13972.591388] spec 0000:02:00.0: FPGA programming successful + [13972.883011] spec 0000:02:00.0: EEPROM has no FRU information + [13972.888719] spec 0000:02:00.0: No device_id filled, using index + [13972.894676] spec 0000:02:00.0: No mezzanine_name found + [13972.899863] /home/rubini/wip/spec-sw/kernel/spec-gpio.c - spec_gpio_init + [13972.906578] spec 0000:04:00.0: probe for device 0004:0000 + [13972.916509] spec 0000:04:00.0: got file "fmc/spec-init.bin", 1484404 (0x16a674) bytes + [13973.115096] spec 0000:04:00.0: FPGA programming successful + [13973.401798] spec 0000:04:00.0: EEPROM has no FRU information + [13973.407474] spec 0000:04:00.0: No device_id filled, using index + [13973.413417] spec 0000:04:00.0: No mezzanine_name found + [13973.418600] /home/rubini/wip/spec-sw/kernel/spec-gpio.c - spec_gpio_init + spusa.root# ls /sys/bus/fmc/devices + fmc-0000 fmc-0001 + spusa.root# insmod fmc-write-eeprom.ko busid=0x0200 file=fdelay-eeprom.bin + [14103.966259] spec 0000:02:00.0: Matching an generic driver (no ID) + [14103.975519] spec 0000:02:00.0: programming 6155 bytes + [14126.373762] spec 0000:02:00.0: write_eeprom: success + [14126.378770] spec 0000:04:00.0: Matching an generic driver (no ID) + [14126.384903] spec 0000:04:00.0: fmc_write_eeprom: no filename given: not programming + [14126.392600] fmc_write_eeprom: probe of fmc-0001 failed with error -2 + +Reading back the EEPROM +======================= + +In order to read back the binary content of the EEPROM of your +mezzanine device, the bus creates a read-only sysfs file called eeprom +for each mezzanine it knows about: + + spusa.root# cd /sys/bus/fmc/devices; ls -l */eeprom + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Apr 9 16:53 FmcDelay1ns4cha-f001/eeprom + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Apr 9 17:19 fake-design-for-testing-f002/eeprom + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Apr 9 17:19 fake-design-for-testing-f003/eeprom + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Apr 9 17:19 fmc-f004/eeprom diff --git a/drivers/fmc/Kconfig b/drivers/fmc/Kconfig index 7eacef990be8..2bb1953c9681 100644 --- a/drivers/fmc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/fmc/Kconfig @@ -32,4 +32,12 @@ config FMC_TRIVIAL The driver also handles interrupts (we used it with a real carrier before the mezzanines were produced) +config FMC_WRITE_EEPROM + tristate "FMC mezzanine driver to write I2C EEPROM" + help + This driver matches every mezzanine device and can write the + internal EEPROM of the PCB, using the firmware loader to get + its binary and the function carrier->reprogram to actually do it. + It is useful when the mezzanines are produced. + endif # FMC diff --git a/drivers/fmc/Makefile b/drivers/fmc/Makefile index 52624e6c0b1f..13701fa6db79 100644 --- a/drivers/fmc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/fmc/Makefile @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ fmc-y += fmc-dump.o obj-$(CONFIG_FMC_FAKEDEV) += fmc-fakedev.o obj-$(CONFIG_FMC_TRIVIAL) += fmc-trivial.o +obj-$(CONFIG_FMC_WRITE_EEPROM) += fmc-write-eeprom.o diff --git a/drivers/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.c b/drivers/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2cc680dd604d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/fmc/fmc-write-eeprom.c @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2012 CERN (www.cern.ch) + * Author: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com> + * + * Released according to the GNU GPL, version 2 or any later version. + * + * This work is part of the White Rabbit project, a research effort led + * by CERN, the European Institute for Nuclear Research. + */ +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/string.h> +#include <linux/firmware.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/fmc.h> +#include <asm/unaligned.h> + +/* + * This module uses the firmware loader to program the whole or part + * of the FMC eeprom. The meat is in the _run functions. However, no + * default file name is provided, to avoid accidental mishaps. Also, + * you must pass the busid argument + */ +static struct fmc_driver fwe_drv; + +FMC_PARAM_BUSID(fwe_drv); + +/* The "file=" is like the generic "gateware=" used elsewhere */ +static char *fwe_file[FMC_MAX_CARDS]; +static int fwe_file_n; +module_param_array_named(file, fwe_file, charp, &fwe_file_n, 444); + +static int fwe_run_tlv(struct fmc_device *fmc, const struct firmware *fw, + int write) +{ + const uint8_t *p = fw->data; + int len = fw->size; + uint16_t thislen, thisaddr; + int err; + + /* format is: 'w' addr16 len16 data... */ + while (len > 5) { + thisaddr = get_unaligned_le16(p+1); + thislen = get_unaligned_le16(p+3); + if (p[0] != 'w' || thislen + 5 > len) { + dev_err(&fmc->dev, "invalid tlv at offset %ti\n", + p - fw->data); + return -EINVAL; + } + err = 0; + if (write) { + dev_info(&fmc->dev, "write %i bytes at 0x%04x\n", + thislen, thisaddr); + err = fmc->op->write_ee(fmc, thisaddr, p + 5, thislen); + } + if (err < 0) { + dev_err(&fmc->dev, "write failure @0x%04x\n", + thisaddr); + return err; + } + p += 5 + thislen; + len -= 5 + thislen; + } + if (write) + dev_info(&fmc->dev, "write_eeprom: success\n"); + return 0; +} + +static int fwe_run_bin(struct fmc_device *fmc, const struct firmware *fw) +{ + int ret; + + dev_info(&fmc->dev, "programming %zi bytes\n", fw->size); + ret = fmc->op->write_ee(fmc, 0, (void *)fw->data, fw->size); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_info(&fmc->dev, "write_eeprom: error %i\n", ret); + return ret; + } + dev_info(&fmc->dev, "write_eeprom: success\n"); + return 0; +} + +static int fwe_run(struct fmc_device *fmc, const struct firmware *fw, char *s) +{ + char *last4 = s + strlen(s) - 4; + int err; + + if (!strcmp(last4, ".bin")) + return fwe_run_bin(fmc, fw); + if (!strcmp(last4, ".tlv")) { + err = fwe_run_tlv(fmc, fw, 0); + if (!err) + err = fwe_run_tlv(fmc, fw, 1); + return err; + } + dev_err(&fmc->dev, "invalid file name \"%s\"\n", s); + return -EINVAL; +} + +/* + * Programming is done at probe time. Morever, only those listed with + * busid= are programmed. + * card is probed for, only one is programmed. Unfortunately, it's + * difficult to know in advance when probing the first card if others + * are there. + */ +int fwe_probe(struct fmc_device *fmc) +{ + int err, index = 0; + const struct firmware *fw; + struct device *dev = &fmc->dev; + char *s; + + if (!fwe_drv.busid_n) { + dev_err(dev, "%s: no busid passed, refusing all cards\n", + KBUILD_MODNAME); + return -ENODEV; + } + if (fmc->op->validate) + index = fmc->op->validate(fmc, &fwe_drv); + if (index < 0) { + pr_err("%s: refusing device \"%s\"\n", KBUILD_MODNAME, + dev_name(dev)); + return -ENODEV; + } + if (index >= fwe_file_n) { + pr_err("%s: no filename for device index %i\n", + KBUILD_MODNAME, index); + return -ENODEV; + } + s = fwe_file[index]; + if (!s) { + pr_err("%s: no filename for \"%s\" not programming\n", + KBUILD_MODNAME, dev_name(dev)); + return -ENOENT; + } + err = request_firmware(&fw, s, dev); + if (err < 0) { + dev_err(&fmc->dev, "request firmware \"%s\": error %i\n", + s, err); + return err; + } + fwe_run(fmc, fw, s); + release_firmware(fw); + return 0; +} + +int fwe_remove(struct fmc_device *fmc) +{ + return 0; +} + +static struct fmc_driver fwe_drv = { + .version = FMC_VERSION, + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME, + .probe = fwe_probe, + .remove = fwe_remove, + /* no table, as the current match just matches everything */ +}; + +static int fwe_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + ret = fmc_driver_register(&fwe_drv); + return ret; +} + +static void fwe_exit(void) +{ + fmc_driver_unregister(&fwe_drv); +} + +module_init(fwe_init); +module_exit(fwe_exit); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |