summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/kunit
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>2022-01-13 08:59:29 -0800
committerShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>2022-01-25 12:49:53 -0700
commitdd640d70874bd27fb081d444252677766321c32f (patch)
treebf2e203954fe8929d65b61848e28a902caa133ef /include/kunit
parenta91e9ade402c48ee35cd1e4b671e3938db798d17 (diff)
downloadlinux-rpi-dd640d70874bd27fb081d444252677766321c32f.tar.gz
linux-rpi-dd640d70874bd27fb081d444252677766321c32f.tar.bz2
linux-rpi-dd640d70874bd27fb081d444252677766321c32f.zip
kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail()
We call this function first thing for all the assertion `format()` functions. This is the part that prints the file and line number and assertion type (EXPECTATION, ASSERTION). Having it as part of the format functions lets us have the flexibility to not print that information (or print it differently) for new assertion types, but I think this we don't need that. And in the future, we'd like to consider factoring that data (file, line#, type) out of the kunit_assert struct and into a `static` variable, as Linus suggested [1], so we'd need to extract it anyways. [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/kunit')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions