summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-12-12 09:15:45 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-12-12 09:15:45 -0800
commit22a40fd9a60388aec8106b0baffc8f59f83bb1b4 (patch)
tree8dae550ae938aac1d1d8ce25a98ca7642d43a0df /fs
parentd206e09036d6201f90b2719484c8a59526c46125 (diff)
parentda8c66638ae684c99abcb30e89d2803402e7ca20 (diff)
downloadlinux-exynos-22a40fd9a60388aec8106b0baffc8f59f83bb1b4.tar.gz
linux-exynos-22a40fd9a60388aec8106b0baffc8f59f83bb1b4.tar.bz2
linux-exynos-22a40fd9a60388aec8106b0baffc8f59f83bb1b4.zip
Merge tag 'dlm-3.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/teigland/linux-dlm
Pull dlm updates from David Teigland: "This set fixes some conditions in which value blocks are invalidated, and includes two trivial cleanups." * tag 'dlm-3.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/teigland/linux-dlm: dlm: fix lvb invalidation conditions fs/dlm: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL dlm: remove unused variable in *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer()
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/Kconfig2
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h1
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/lock.c16
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/lowcomms.c5
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/recover.c37
5 files changed, 47 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/fs/dlm/Kconfig b/fs/dlm/Kconfig
index 1897eb1b4b6a..e4242c3f8486 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/dlm/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
menuconfig DLM
tristate "Distributed Lock Manager (DLM)"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL && INET
+ depends on INET
depends on SYSFS && CONFIGFS_FS && (IPV6 || IPV6=n)
select IP_SCTP
help
diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
index 871c1abf6029..77c0f70f8fe8 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
@@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ enum rsb_flags {
RSB_NEW_MASTER2,
RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT,
RSB_RECOVER_GRANT,
+ RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL,
};
static inline void rsb_set_flag(struct dlm_rsb *r, enum rsb_flags flag)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index b56950758188..a579f30f237d 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -5393,6 +5393,13 @@ static void purge_dead_list(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rsb *r,
if ((lkb->lkb_nodeid == nodeid_gone) ||
dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_nodeid)) {
+ /* tell recover_lvb to invalidate the lvb
+ because a node holding EX/PW failed */
+ if ((lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_VALBLK) &&
+ (lkb->lkb_grmode >= DLM_LOCK_PW)) {
+ rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL);
+ }
+
del_lkb(r, lkb);
/* this put should free the lkb */
@@ -6025,15 +6032,18 @@ static int orphan_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
return error;
}
-/* The force flag allows the unlock to go ahead even if the lkb isn't granted.
- Regardless of what rsb queue the lock is on, it's removed and freed. */
+/* The FORCEUNLOCK flag allows the unlock to go ahead even if the lkb isn't
+ granted. Regardless of what rsb queue the lock is on, it's removed and
+ freed. The IVVALBLK flag causes the lvb on the resource to be invalidated
+ if our lock is PW/EX (it's ignored if our granted mode is smaller.) */
static int unlock_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
{
struct dlm_args args;
int error;
- set_unlock_args(DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK, lkb->lkb_ua, &args);
+ set_unlock_args(DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK | DLM_LKF_IVVALBLK,
+ lkb->lkb_ua, &args);
error = unlock_lock(ls, lkb, &args);
if (error == -DLM_EUNLOCK)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index 331ea4f94efd..dd87a31bcc21 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -1385,7 +1385,6 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc)
struct connection *con;
struct writequeue_entry *e;
int offset = 0;
- int users = 0;
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, allocation);
if (!con)
@@ -1399,7 +1398,7 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc)
} else {
offset = e->end;
e->end += len;
- users = e->users++;
+ e->users++;
}
spin_unlock(&con->writequeue_lock);
@@ -1414,7 +1413,7 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc)
spin_lock(&con->writequeue_lock);
offset = e->end;
e->end += len;
- users = e->users++;
+ e->users++;
list_add_tail(&e->list, &con->writequeue);
spin_unlock(&con->writequeue_lock);
goto got_one;
diff --git a/fs/dlm/recover.c b/fs/dlm/recover.c
index 4a7a76e42fc3..aedea28a86a1 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/recover.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/recover.c
@@ -717,8 +717,14 @@ void dlm_recovered_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r)
* the VALNOTVALID flag if necessary, and determining the correct lvb contents
* based on the lvb's of the locks held on the rsb.
*
- * RSB_VALNOTVALID is set if there are only NL/CR locks on the rsb. If it
- * was already set prior to recovery, it's not cleared, regardless of locks.
+ * RSB_VALNOTVALID is set in two cases:
+ *
+ * 1. we are master, but not new, and we purged an EX/PW lock held by a
+ * failed node (in dlm_recover_purge which set RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL)
+ *
+ * 2. we are a new master, and there are only NL/CR locks left.
+ * (We could probably improve this by only invaliding in this way when
+ * the previous master left uncleanly. VMS docs mention that.)
*
* The LVB contents are only considered for changing when this is a new master
* of the rsb (NEW_MASTER2). Then, the rsb's lvb is taken from any lkb with
@@ -734,6 +740,19 @@ static void recover_lvb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
int big_lock_exists = 0;
int lvblen = r->res_ls->ls_lvblen;
+ if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2) &&
+ rsb_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL)) {
+ /* case 1 above */
+ rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2))
+ return;
+
+ /* we are the new master, so figure out if VALNOTVALID should
+ be set, and set the rsb lvb from the best lkb available. */
+
list_for_each_entry(lkb, &r->res_grantqueue, lkb_statequeue) {
if (!(lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_VALBLK))
continue;
@@ -772,13 +791,10 @@ static void recover_lvb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
if (!lock_lvb_exists)
goto out;
+ /* lvb is invalidated if only NL/CR locks remain */
if (!big_lock_exists)
rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID);
- /* don't mess with the lvb unless we're the new master */
- if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2))
- goto out;
-
if (!r->res_lvbptr) {
r->res_lvbptr = dlm_allocate_lvb(r->res_ls);
if (!r->res_lvbptr)
@@ -852,12 +868,19 @@ void dlm_recover_rsbs(struct dlm_ls *ls)
if (is_master(r)) {
if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT))
recover_conversion(r);
+
+ /* recover lvb before granting locks so the updated
+ lvb/VALNOTVALID is presented in the completion */
+ recover_lvb(r);
+
if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2))
recover_grant(r);
- recover_lvb(r);
count++;
+ } else {
+ rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID);
}
rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT);
+ rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL);
rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2);
unlock_rsb(r);
}