summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jbd2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>2015-07-12 18:11:30 -0400
committerTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2015-07-12 18:11:30 -0400
commit6e06ae88edae77379bef7c0cb7d3c2dd88676867 (patch)
tree7a8fd3e3ccbb6d65bb420ddc48454cb5a72efb5c /fs/jbd2
parentbc0195aad0daa2ad5b0d76cce22b167bc3435590 (diff)
downloadlinux-exynos-6e06ae88edae77379bef7c0cb7d3c2dd88676867.tar.gz
linux-exynos-6e06ae88edae77379bef7c0cb7d3c2dd88676867.tar.bz2
linux-exynos-6e06ae88edae77379bef7c0cb7d3c2dd88676867.zip
jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or references. [ Note: this is a fixed version of commit 2143c1965a761, which was reverted in ebeaa8ddb3663b5 due to a false positive triggering of an assertion check. -- Ted ] Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd2')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd2/transaction.c38
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index f3d06174b051..a6eec9747c74 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1280,8 +1280,6 @@ void jbd2_buffer_abort_trigger(struct journal_head *jh,
triggers->t_abort(triggers, jh2bh(jh));
}
-
-
/**
* int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() - mark a buffer as containing dirty metadata
* @handle: transaction to add buffer to.
@@ -1314,12 +1312,41 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
return -EROFS;
- journal = transaction->t_journal;
- jh = jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh);
- if (!jh) {
+ if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
ret = -EUCLEAN;
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
+ * of the running transaction.
+ */
+ jh = bh2jh(bh);
+ /*
+ * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh
+ * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is
+ * crucial to catch bugs so let's do a reliable check until the
+ * lockless handling is fully proven.
+ */
+ if (jh->b_transaction != transaction &&
+ jh->b_next_transaction != transaction) {
+ jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+ J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == transaction ||
+ jh->b_next_transaction == transaction);
+ jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+ }
+ if (jh->b_modified == 1) {
+ /* If it's in our transaction it must be in BJ_Metadata list. */
+ if (jh->b_transaction == transaction &&
+ jh->b_jlist != BJ_Metadata) {
+ jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+ J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != transaction ||
+ jh->b_jlist == BJ_Metadata);
+ jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+ }
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ journal = transaction->t_journal;
jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
@@ -1410,7 +1437,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
out_unlock_bh:
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
- jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
out:
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "exit");
return ret;