diff options
| author | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2013-02-10 11:33:48 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-03-04 06:06:43 +0800 |
| commit | 7e5e167c5c1b44f408fa8f8a8f062f234cd0f0d6 (patch) | |
| tree | 4d07cc6f35b269d6ce80e678db56ba36dcb8e57f /net | |
| parent | 5623a7cc4e3f0f461586b10b78967bb5f53fa096 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3.10-7e5e167c5c1b44f408fa8f8a8f062f234cd0f0d6.tar.gz linux-3.10-7e5e167c5c1b44f408fa8f8a8f062f234cd0f0d6.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-7e5e167c5c1b44f408fa8f8a8f062f234cd0f0d6.zip | |
svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
commit e75bafbff2270993926abcc31358361db74a9bc2 upstream.
svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list. Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.
I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)
Tested-by: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Tested-by: Paweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index fd9b2889aa9..aec7dbb9d3d 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -817,7 +817,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure) struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure; struct svc_xprt *xprt; struct list_head *le, *next; - LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged); dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n"); @@ -838,25 +837,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure) if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 || test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)) continue; - svc_xprt_get(xprt); - list_move(le, &to_be_aged); + list_del_init(le); set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags); set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags); - } - spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); - - while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) { - le = to_be_aged.next; - /* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */ - list_del_init(le); - xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list); - dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt); /* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */ svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); - svc_xprt_put(xprt); } + spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ); } |