diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'm4/stdbool.m4')
| -rw-r--r-- | m4/stdbool.m4 | 142 |
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 71 deletions
diff --git a/m4/stdbool.m4 b/m4/stdbool.m4 index 3d672d7..2204ecd 100644 --- a/m4/stdbool.m4 +++ b/m4/stdbool.m4 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Check for stdbool.h that conforms to C99. -dnl Copyright (C) 2002-2006, 2009-2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +dnl Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. @@ -38,78 +38,78 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_HEADER_STDBOOL], [AC_CACHE_CHECK([for stdbool.h that conforms to C99], [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h], [AC_TRY_COMPILE( - [ - #include <stdbool.h> - #ifndef bool - "error: bool is not defined" - #endif - #ifndef false - "error: false is not defined" - #endif - #if false - "error: false is not 0" - #endif - #ifndef true - "error: true is not defined" - #endif - #if true != 1 - "error: true is not 1" - #endif - #ifndef __bool_true_false_are_defined - "error: __bool_true_false_are_defined is not defined" - #endif + [ + #include <stdbool.h> + #ifndef bool + "error: bool is not defined" + #endif + #ifndef false + "error: false is not defined" + #endif + #if false + "error: false is not 0" + #endif + #ifndef true + "error: true is not defined" + #endif + #if true != 1 + "error: true is not 1" + #endif + #ifndef __bool_true_false_are_defined + "error: __bool_true_false_are_defined is not defined" + #endif - struct s { _Bool s: 1; _Bool t; } s; + struct s { _Bool s: 1; _Bool t; } s; - char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1]; - char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1]; - char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1]; - char d[(bool) 0.5 == true ? 1 : -1]; - bool e = &s; - char f[(_Bool) 0.0 == false ? 1 : -1]; - char g[true]; - char h[sizeof (_Bool)]; - char i[sizeof s.t]; - enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 }; - _Bool n[m]; - char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1]; - char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1]; - #if defined __xlc__ || defined __GNUC__ - /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0 - reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html - This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to - reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is - not one of the forms that C requires support for. - However, doing the test right would require a run-time - test, and that would make cross-compilation harder. - Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds - support for this kind of constant expression. In the - meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since - our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. We also test - this with GCC, where it should work, to detect more - quickly whether someone messes up the test in the - future. */ - char digs[] = "0123456789"; - int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1); - #endif - /* Catch a bug in an HP-UX C compiler. See - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html - */ - _Bool q = true; - _Bool *pq = &q; - ], - [ - *pq |= q; - *pq |= ! q; - /* Refer to every declared value, to avoid compiler optimizations. */ - return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !!j + !k + !!l - + !m + !n + !o + !p + !q + !pq); - ], - [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=yes], - [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no])]) + char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1]; + char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1]; + char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1]; + char d[(bool) 0.5 == true ? 1 : -1]; + bool e = &s; + char f[(_Bool) 0.0 == false ? 1 : -1]; + char g[true]; + char h[sizeof (_Bool)]; + char i[sizeof s.t]; + enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 }; + _Bool n[m]; + char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1]; + char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1]; + #if defined __xlc__ || defined __GNUC__ + /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0 + reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see + http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html + This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to + reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is + not one of the forms that C requires support for. + However, doing the test right would require a run-time + test, and that would make cross-compilation harder. + Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds + support for this kind of constant expression. In the + meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since + our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. We also test + this with GCC, where it should work, to detect more + quickly whether someone messes up the test in the + future. */ + char digs[] = "0123456789"; + int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1); + #endif + /* Catch a bug in an HP-UX C compiler. See + http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html + http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html + */ + _Bool q = true; + _Bool *pq = &q; + ], + [ + *pq |= q; + *pq |= ! q; + /* Refer to every declared value, to avoid compiler optimizations. */ + return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !!j + !k + !!l + + !m + !n + !o + !p + !q + !pq); + ], + [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=yes], + [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no])]) AC_CHECK_TYPES([_Bool]) if test $ac_cv_header_stdbool_h = yes; then - AC_DEFINE([HAVE_STDBOOL_H], [1], [Define to 1 if stdbool.h conforms to C99.]) + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STDBOOL_H, 1, [Define to 1 if stdbool.h conforms to C99.]) fi]) |