summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/check-qom-proplist.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-02-16tests: Clean up includesPeter Maydell1-0/+1
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers which it implies are not included manually. This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
2016-01-18qom: Change object property iterator API contractDaniel P. Berrange1-4/+3
Currently the ObjectProperty iterator API works as follows: ObjectPropertyIterator *iter; iter = object_property_iter_init(obj); while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(iter))) { ... } object_property_iter_free(iter); This has the benefit that the ObjectPropertyIterator struct can be opaque, but has the downside that callers need to explicitly call a free function. It is also not in keeping with iterator style used elsewhere in QEMU/GLib2. This patch changes the API to use stack allocation instead: ObjectPropertyIterator iter; object_property_iter_init(&iter, obj); while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(&iter))) { ... } Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [AF: Fused ObjectPropertyIterator struct with typedef] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2016-01-18qom: Allow properties to be registered against classesDaniel P. Berrange1-10/+21
When there are many instances of a given class, registering properties against the instance is wasteful of resources. The majority of objects have a statically defined list of possible properties, so most of the properties are easily registerable against the class. Only those properties which are conditionally registered at runtime need be recorded against the klass. Registering properties against classes also makes it possible to provide static introspection of QOM - currently introspection is only possible after creating an instance of a class, which severely limits its usefulness. This impl only supports simple scalar properties. It does not attempt to allow child object / link object properties against the class. There are ways to support those too, but it would make this patch more complicated, so it is left as an exercise for the future. There is no equivalent to object_property_del() provided, since classes must be immutable once they are defined. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2015-11-18qom: Add a test case for complex property finalizationDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+159
Devices have some quite complex object child/link relationships which place some requirements on the object_property_del_all() function to consider that properties can be modified while being iterated over. This extends the QOM property test case to replicate the device like structure and expose any potential bugs in the object_property_del_all() function. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2015-11-18qom: Introduce ObjectPropertyIterator struct for iterationDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+46
Some users of QOM need to be able to iterate over properties defined against an object instance. Currently they are just directly using the QTAIL macros against the object properties data structure. This is bad because it exposes them to changes in the data structure used to store properties, as well as changes in functionality such as ability to register properties against the class. This provides an ObjectPropertyIterator struct which will insulate the callers from the particular data structure used to store properties. It can be used thus ObjectProperty *prop; ObjectPropertyIterator *iter; iter = object_property_iter_init(obj); while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(iter))) { ... do something with prop ... } object_property_iter_free(iter); Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Tested-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> [AF: Fixed examples, style cleanups] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2015-06-19qom: Don't pass string table to object_get_enum() functionDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+43
Now that properties can be explicitly registered as an enum type, there is no need to pass the string table to the object_get_enum() function. The object property registration already has a pointer to the string table. In changing this method signature, the hostmem backend object has to be converted to use the new enum property registration code, which simplifies it somewhat. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2015-06-19qom: Add an object_property_add_enum() helper functionDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+73
A QOM property can be parsed as enum using the visit_type_enum() helper function, but this forces callers to use the more complex generic object_property_add() method when registering it. It also requires that users of that object have access to the string map when they want to read the property value. This patch introduces a specialized object_property_add_enum() method which simplifies the use of enum properties, so the setters/getters directly get passed the int value. typedef enum { MYDEV_TYPE_FROG, MYDEV_TYPE_ALLIGATOR, MYDEV_TYPE_PLATYPUS, MYDEV_TYPE_LAST } MyDevType; Then provide a table of enum <-> string mappings static const char *const mydevtypemap[MYDEV_TYPE_LAST + 1] = { [MYDEV_TYPE_FROG] = "frog", [MYDEV_TYPE_ALLIGATOR] = "alligator", [MYDEV_TYPE_PLATYPUS] = "platypus", [MYDEV_TYPE_LAST] = NULL, }; Assuming an object struct of typedef struct { Object parent_obj; MyDevType devtype; ...other fields... } MyDev; The property can then be registered as follows: static int mydev_prop_get_devtype(Object *obj, Error **errp G_GNUC_UNUSED) { MyDev *dev = MYDEV(obj); return dev->devtype; } static void mydev_prop_set_devtype(Object *obj, int value, Error **errp G_GNUC_UNUSED) { MyDev *dev = MYDEV(obj); dev->devtype = value; } object_property_add_enum(obj, "devtype", mydevtypemap, "MyDevType", mydev_prop_get_devtype, mydev_prop_set_devtype, NULL); Note there is no need to check the range of 'value' in the setter, because the string->enum conversion code will have already done that and reported an error as required. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2015-06-19qom: Add object_new_with_props() / object_new_withpropv() helpersDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+186
It is reasonably common to want to create an object, set a number of properties, register it in the hierarchy and then mark it as complete (if a user creatable type). This requires quite a lot of error prone, verbose, boilerplate code to achieve. First a pair of functions object_set_props() / object_set_propv() are added which allow for a list of objects to be set in one single API call. Then object_new_with_props() / object_new_with_propv() constructors are added which simplify the sequence of calls to create an object, populate properties, register in the object composition tree and mark the object complete, into a single method call. Usage would be: Error *err = NULL; Object *obj; obj = object_new_with_propv(TYPE_MEMORY_BACKEND_FILE, object_get_objects_root(), "hostmem0", &err, "share", "yes", "mem-path", "/dev/shm/somefile", "prealloc", "yes", "size", "1048576", NULL); Note all property values are passed in string form and will be parsed into their required data types, using normal QOM semantics for parsing from string format. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>