summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/raw_bsd.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-08-30switch raw block driver from "raw.o" to "raw_bsd.o"Laszlo Ersek1-34/+44
"Incoming" function prototypes and "outgoing" function calls must match reality. Implemented using the "struct BlockDriver" definition in "include/block/block_int.h", and gcc errors & warnings. v1->v2: On 08/20/13 09:51, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 18.08.2013 um 16:29 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> Il 16/08/2013 16:15, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: >>> +static int raw_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *reopen_state, >>> + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp) >>> { >>> - return bdrv_reopen_prepare(bs->file); >>> + BDRVReopenState tmp = *reopen_state; >>> + >>> + tmp.bs = tmp.bs->file; >>> + return bdrv_reopen_prepare(&tmp, queue, errp); >>> } >> >> This should just return zero, my fault. > > Which is because bdrv_reopen_queue() already queues bs->file for reopen. > The simple return 0; implementation is shared by all other format drivers > that support reopening images. Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30raw_bsd: register bdrv_rawLaszlo Ersek1-5/+33
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > [...] > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). You > also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. Fill in the BlockDriver structure with the raw_*() functions that have been added to "block/raw_bsd.c", in the order the fields are defined in "include/block/block_int.h". I needed more explanation / naming examples for registering the driver than what Paolo gave me, so I copied / adapted from "block/qcow2.c". The parts I took as basis for modification are blamed on commit 5efa9d5a8b18841c9c62208a494d7f519238979a Author: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Date: Sat May 9 17:03:42 2009 -0500 Convert block infrastructure to use new module init functionality commit 20d97356c9df6d68fbd37d6334fdb7063f24eab6 Author: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> Date: Fri Apr 23 20:19:47 2010 +0000 Fix OpenBSD build Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30raw_bsd: add raw_create_optionsLaszlo Ersek1-1/+12
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > [...] > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. Code taken and adapted from "block/qcow2.c", as suggested. The code being copied/modified is blamed on commit 20d97356c9df6d68fbd37d6334fdb7063f24eab6 Author: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> Date: Fri Apr 23 20:19:47 2010 +0000 Fix OpenBSD build and commit 7c80ab3f21f0b1342f23057d4345ae266c7348d9 Author: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> Date: Fri Dec 17 16:02:39 2010 +0100 block/qcow2.c: rename qcow_ functions to qcow2_ Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30raw_bsd: introduce "special members"Laszlo Ersek1-0/+23
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > [...] > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. v1->v2: On 08/20/13 10:11, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.08.2013 um 16:15 hat Laszlo Ersek geschrieben: >> +static int raw_probe(void) >> +{ >> + return 1; >> +} > > Maybe add a comment here like "smallest possible positive score so that > raw is used if and only if no other block driver works". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30raw_bsd: add raw_create()Laszlo Ersek1-0/+4
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > [...] > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function is > bdrv_create_file. Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30raw_bsd: emit debug events in bdrv_co_readv() and bdrv_co_writev()Laszlo Ersek1-0/+2
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > [...] > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). There are > 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this already accounts > for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also call > BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The events > to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-30add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriverLaszlo Ersek1-0/+108
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>