summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVitaly Chipounov <vitaly.chipounov@epfl.ch>2012-07-03 00:20:49 +0200
committerBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>2012-07-29 08:45:57 +0000
commit7162ab21fe8e82f924002951cd8e87f69358f8b5 (patch)
tree97bac741e500dac066d88c33c309b8fe73cac340 /hw
parente6d91ab66bad2bce9319fe8b0011f765042a7bb2 (diff)
downloadqemu-7162ab21fe8e82f924002951cd8e87f69358f8b5.tar.gz
qemu-7162ab21fe8e82f924002951cd8e87f69358f8b5.tar.bz2
qemu-7162ab21fe8e82f924002951cd8e87f69358f8b5.zip
x86: Fixed incorrect segment base address addition in 64-bits mode
According to the Intel manual "Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual Volume 3", "3.4.4 Segment Loading Instructions in IA-32e Mode": "When in compatibility mode, FS and GS overrides operate as defined by 32-bit mode behavior regardless of the value loaded into the upper 32 linear-address bits of the hidden descriptor register base field. Compatibility mode ignores the upper 32 bits when calculating an effective address." However, the code misses the 64-bit mode case, where an instruction with address and segment size override would be translated incorrectly. For example, inc dword ptr gs:260h[ebx*4] gets incorrectly translated to: (uint32_t)(gs.base + ebx * 4 + 0x260) instead of gs.base + (uint32_t)(ebx * 4 + 0x260) Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chipounov <vitaly.chipounov@epfl.ch> Reviewed-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions