From 86e1e98e5c6b4edab97e2b058466ef553cfd878e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ellenberg Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:22:48 +0200 Subject: drbd: we should write meta data updates with FLUSH FUA We used to write these with BIO_RW_BARRIER aka REQ_HARDBARRIER (unless disabled in the configuration). The correct semantic now would be to write with FLUSH/FUA. For example, with activity log transactions, FUA alone is not enough, we need the corresponding bitmap update (and all related application updates) on stable storage as well. Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c index 09ef9a878ef0..cf0e63dd97da 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int _drbd_md_sync_page_io(struct drbd_conf *mdev, md_io.error = 0; if ((rw & WRITE) && !test_bit(MD_NO_FUA, &mdev->flags)) - rw |= REQ_FUA; + rw |= REQ_FUA | REQ_FLUSH; rw |= REQ_SYNC; bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1); -- cgit v1.2.3