summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>2011-07-21 15:02:43 +0100
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-07-21 10:59:16 -0700
commitb307d4655a71749ac3f91c6dbe33d28cc026ceeb (patch)
tree4d00cd36cf277da7e45333d2a0574bf4a523cc58 /fs
parentcf6ace16a3cd8b728fb0afa68368fd40bbeae19f (diff)
downloadkernel-common-b307d4655a71749ac3f91c6dbe33d28cc026ceeb.tar.gz
kernel-common-b307d4655a71749ac3f91c6dbe33d28cc026ceeb.tar.bz2
kernel-common-b307d4655a71749ac3f91c6dbe33d28cc026ceeb.zip
FS-Cache: Fix __fscache_uncache_all_inode_pages()'s outer loop
The compiler, at least for ix86 and m68k, validly warns that the comparison: next <= (loff_t)-1 is always true (and it's always true also for x86-64 and probably all other arches - as long as pgoff_t isn't wider than loff_t). The intention appears to be to avoid wrapping of "next", so rather than eliminating the pointless comparison, fix the loop to indeed get exited when "next" would otherwise wrap. On m68k the following warning is observed: fs/fscache/page.c: In function '__fscache_uncache_all_inode_pages': fs/fscache/page.c:979: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/fscache/page.c14
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fscache/page.c b/fs/fscache/page.c
index 2f343b4d7a7d..3f7a59bfa7ad 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/page.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/page.c
@@ -976,16 +976,12 @@ void __fscache_uncache_all_inode_pages(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
next = 0;
- while (next <= (loff_t)-1 &&
- pagevec_lookup(&pvec, mapping, next, PAGEVEC_SIZE)
- ) {
+ do {
+ if (!pagevec_lookup(&pvec, mapping, next, PAGEVEC_SIZE))
+ break;
for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++) {
struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
- pgoff_t page_index = page->index;
-
- ASSERTCMP(page_index, >=, next);
- next = page_index + 1;
-
+ next = page->index;
if (PageFsCache(page)) {
__fscache_wait_on_page_write(cookie, page);
__fscache_uncache_page(cookie, page);
@@ -993,7 +989,7 @@ void __fscache_uncache_all_inode_pages(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
}
pagevec_release(&pvec);
cond_resched();
- }
+ } while (++next);
_leave("");
}