diff options
author | Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> | 2008-12-18 16:19:43 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> | 2008-12-18 16:19:43 -0600 |
commit | e4341aa1d4f48978563d3538a96be7736831e89c (patch) | |
tree | 280a358311ee3b3b068bc6d62563b16eb728646d | |
parent | 546ead6f4068611b7504baae1bf678d8b0b22942 (diff) | |
download | toybox-e4341aa1d4f48978563d3538a96be7736831e89c.tar.gz toybox-e4341aa1d4f48978563d3538a96be7736831e89c.tar.bz2 toybox-e4341aa1d4f48978563d3538a96be7736831e89c.zip |
Fix the old dead link about mepis with one from linux.com. (Thanks Christian Holtje.)
-rwxr-xr-x | www/licenserant.html | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/www/licenserant.html b/www/licenserant.html index e3c0a92..b6af90f 100755 --- a/www/licenserant.html +++ b/www/licenserant.html @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ <!--#include file="header.html" --> <p>The reason for the clarification of section 3 is that -<a href="http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/23/1728205&tid=150">what the FSF did to Mepis</a> was inexcusable. (Further discussed +<a href="http://www.linux.com/articles/55285">what the FSF did to Mepis</a> was inexcusable. (Further discussed in <a href="http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-June/022797.html">this thread</a>.)</p> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ company that was acting in good faith.</p> clarifying that if you didn't modify the source code, and the binaries you're distributing can be entirely regenerated from a public upstream source, pointing to that upstream source in good faith is good enough for us. As -long as the upstream source don't doesn't object to the extra bandwidth, +long as the upstream source doesn't object to the extra bandwidth, and the correct source code stays available at that location you specify for the duration of your responsiblity to redistribute source, life is good.</p> |