1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
|
-*- indented-text -*-
BUGS ---------------------------------------------------------------
rsync-url barfs on upload
rsync foo rsync://localhost/transfer/
Fix the parser.
There seems to be a bug with hardlinks
mbp/2 build$ ls -l /tmp/a /tmp/b -i
/tmp/a:
total 32
2568307 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a1
2568307 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a2
2568307 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a3
2568310 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a4
2568310 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a5
2568310 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b1
2568310 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b2
2568310 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b3
/tmp/b:
total 32
2568309 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a1
2568309 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a2
2568309 -rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a3
2568311 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a4
2568311 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a5
2568311 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b1
2568311 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b2
2568311 -rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b3
mbp/2 build$ rm -r /tmp/b && ./rsync -avH /tmp/a/ /tmp/b
building file list ... done
created directory /tmp/b
./
a1
a4
a2 => a1
a3 => a2
wrote 350 bytes read 52 bytes 804.00 bytes/sec
total size is 232 speedup is 0.58
mbp/2 build$ rm -r /tmp/b
mbp/2 build$ ls -l /tmp/b
ls: /tmp/b: No such file or directory
mbp/2 build$ rm -r /tmp/b && ./rsync -avH /tmp/a/ /tmp/b
rm: cannot remove `/tmp/b': No such file or directory
mbp/2 build$ rm -f -r /tmp/b && ./rsync -avH /tmp/a/ /tmp/b
building file list ... done
created directory /tmp/b
./
a1
a4
a2 => a1
a3 => a2
wrote 350 bytes read 52 bytes 804.00 bytes/sec
total size is 232 speedup is 0.58
mbp/2 build$ ls -l /tmp/b
total 32
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a1
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a2
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a3
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a4
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a5
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b1
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b2
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b3
mbp/2 build$ ls -l /tmp/a
total 32
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a1
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a2
-rw-rw-r-- 3 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a3
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a4
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 a5
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b1
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b2
-rw-rw-r-- 5 mbp mbp 29 Mar 25 17:30 b3
Progress indicator can produce corrupt output when transferring directories:
main/binary-arm/
main/binary-arm/admin/
main/binary-arm/base/
main/binary-arm/comm/8.56kB/s 0:00:52
main/binary-arm/devel/
main/binary-arm/doc/
main/binary-arm/editors/
main/binary-arm/electronics/s 0:00:53
main/binary-arm/games/
main/binary-arm/graphics/
main/binary-arm/hamradio/
main/binary-arm/interpreters/
main/binary-arm/libs/6.61kB/s 0:00:54
main/binary-arm/mail/
main/binary-arm/math/
main/binary-arm/misc/
lchmod
I don't think we handle this properly on systems that don't have the
call. Are there any such?
Cross-test versions
Part of the regression suite should be making sure that we don't
break backwards compatibility: old clients vs new servers and so
on. Ideally we would test the cross product of versions.
It might be sufficient to test downloads from well-known public
rsync servers running different versions of rsync. This will give
some testing and also be the most common case for having different
versions and not being able to upgrade.
--no-blocking-io might be broken
in the same way as --no-whole-file; somebody needs to check.
Do not rely on having a group called "nobody"
http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.1.0/gLSB/usernames.html
On Debian it's "nogroup"
DAEMON --------------------------------------------------------------
server-imposed bandwidth limits
rsyncd over ssh
There are already some patches to do this.
BitKeeper uses a server whose login shell is set to bkd. That's
probably a reasonable approach.
FEATURES ------------------------------------------------------------
--dry-run is insufficiently dry
Mark Santcroos points out that -n fails to list files which have
only metadata changes, though it probably should.
There may be a Debian bug about this as well.
use chroot
If the platform doesn't support it, then don't even try.
If running as non-root, then don't fail, just give a warning.
(There was a thread about this a while ago?)
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-August/thread.html
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-September/thread.html
--files-from
Avoids traversal. Better option than a pile of --include statements
for people who want to generate the file list using a find(1)
command or a script.
supplementary groups
Perhaps allow supplementary groups to be specified in rsyncd.conf;
then make the first one the primary gid and all the rest be
supplementary gids.
File list structure in memory
Rather than one big array, perhaps have a tree in memory mirroring
the directory tree.
This might make sorting much faster! (I'm not sure it's a big CPU
problem, mind you.)
It might also reduce memory use in storing repeated directory names
-- again I'm not sure this is a problem.
Performance
Traverse just one directory at a time. Tridge says it's possible.
At the moment rsync reads the whole file list into memory at the
start, which makes us use a lot of memory and also not pipeline
network access as much as we could.
Handling duplicate names
We need to be careful of duplicate names getting into the file list.
See clean_flist(). This could happen if multiple arguments include
the same file. Bad.
I think duplicates are only a problem if they're both flowing
through the pipeline at the same time. For example we might have
updated the first occurrence after reading the checksums for the
second. So possibly we just need to make sure that we don't have
both in the pipeline at the same time.
Possibly if we did one directory at a time that would be sufficient.
Alternatively we could pre-process the arguments to make sure no
duplicates will ever be inserted. There could be some bad cases
when we're collapsing symlinks.
We could have a hash table.
The root of the problem is that we do not want more than one file
list entry referring to the same file. At first glance there are
several ways this could happen: symlinks, hardlinks, and repeated
names on the command line.
If names are repeated on the command line, they may be present in
different forms, perhaps by traversing directory paths in different
ways, traversing paths including symlinks. Also we need to allow
for expansion of globs by rsync.
At the moment, clean_flist() requires having the entire file list in
memory. Duplicate names are detected just by a string comparison.
We don't need to worry about hard links causing duplicates because
files are never updated in place. Similarly for symlinks.
I think even if we're using a different symlink mode we don't need
to worry.
Unless we're really clever this will introduce a protocol
incompatibility, so we need to be able to accept the old format as
well.
Memory accounting
At exit, show how much memory was used for the file list, etc.
Also we do a wierd exponential-growth allocation in flist.c. I'm
not sure this makes sense with modern mallocs. At any rate it will
make us allocate a huge amount of memory for large file lists.
Hard-link handling
At the moment hardlink handling is very expensive, so it's off by
default. It does not need to be so.
Since most of the solutions are rather intertwined with the file
list it is probably better to fix that first, although fixing
hardlinks is possibly simpler.
We can rule out hardlinked directories since they will probably
screw us up in all kinds of ways. They simply should not be used.
At the moment rsync only cares about hardlinks to regular files. I
guess you could also use them for sockets, devices and other beasts,
but I have not seen them.
When trying to reproduce hard links, we only need to worry about
files that have more than one name (nlinks>1 && !S_ISDIR).
The basic point of this is to discover alternate names that refer to
the same file. All operations, including creating the file and
writing modifications to it need only to be done for the first name.
For all later names, we just create the link and then leave it
alone.
If hard links are to be preserved:
Before the generator/receiver fork, the list of files is received
from the sender (recv_file_list), and a table for detecting hard
links is built.
The generator looks for hard links within the file list and does
not send checksums for them, though it does send other metadata.
The sender sends the device number and inode with file entries, so
that files are uniquely identified.
The receiver goes through and creates hard links (do_hard_links)
after all data has been written, but before directory permissions
are set.
At the moment device and inum are sent as 4-byte integers, which
will probably cause problems on large filesystems. On Linux the
kernel uses 64-bit ino_t's internally, and people will soon have
filesystems big enough to use them. We ought to follow NFS4 in
using 64-bit device and inode identification, perhaps with a
protocol version bump.
Once we've seen all the names for a particular file, we no longer
need to think about it and we can deallocate the memory.
We can also have the case where there are links to a file that are
not in the tree being transferred. There's nothing we can do about
that. Because we rename the destination into place after writing,
any hardlinks to the old file are always going to be orphaned. In
fact that is almost necessary because otherwise we'd get really
confused if we were generating checksums for one name of a file and
modifying another.
At the moment the code seems to make a whole second copy of the file
list, which seems unnecessary.
We should have a test case that exercises hard links. Since it
might be hard to compare ./tls output where the inodes change we
might need a little program to check whether several names refer to
the same file.
IPv6
Perhaps put back the old socket code; if on a machine that does not
properly support the getaddrinfo API, then use it. This is probably
much simpler than reimplementing it.
Alternatively, have two different files implementing the same
interface, and choose either the new or the old API. This is
probably necessary for systems that e.g. have IPv6, but
gethostbyaddr() can't handle it. The Linux manpage claims this is
currently the case.
This might get us working again on RedHat 5 and similar systems.
Although the Kame patch seems like a good idea, in fact it is a much
broader interface than the relatively narrow "open by name", "accept
and log" interface that rsync uses internally, and it has the
disadvantage of clashing with half-arsed implementations of the API.
Implement suggestions from http://www.kame.net/newsletter/19980604/
and ftp://ftp.iij.ad.jp/pub/RFC/rfc2553.txt
If a host has multiple addresses, then listen try to connect to all
in order until we get through. (getaddrinfo may return multiple
addresses.) This is kind of implemented already.
Possibly also when starting as a server we may need to listen on
multiple passive addresses. This might be a bit harder, because we
may need to select on all of them. Hm.
Define a syntax for IPv6 literal addresses. Since they include
colons, they tend to break most naming systems, including ours.
Based on the HTTP IPv6 syntax, I think we should use
rsync://[::1]/foo/bar
[::1]::bar
which should just take a small change to the parser code.
Errors
If we hang or get SIGINT, then explain where we were up to. Perhaps
have a static buffer that contains the current function name, or
some kind of description of what we were trying to do. This is a
little easier on people than needing to run strace/truss.
"The dungeon collapses! You are killed." Rather than "unexpected
eof" give a message that is more detailed if possible and also more
helpful.
If we get an error writing to a socket, then we should perhaps
continue trying to read to see if an error message comes across
explaining why the socket is closed. I'm not sure if this would
work, but it would certainly make our messages more helpful.
What happens if a directory is missing -x attributes. Do we lose
our load? (Debian #28416) Probably fixed now, but a test case
would be good.
File attributes
Device major/minor numbers should be at least 32 bits each. See
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-November/005357.html
Transfer ACLs. Need to think of a standard representation.
Probably better not to even try to convert between NT and POSIX.
Possibly can share some code with Samba.
Empty directories
With the current common --include '*/' --exclude '*' pattern, people
can end up with many empty directories. We might avoid this by
lazily creating such directories.
zlib
Perhaps don't use our own zlib.
Advantages:
- will automatically be up to date with bugfixes in zlib
- can leave it out for small rsync on e.g. recovery disks
- can use a shared library
- avoids people breaking rsync by trying to do this themselves and
messing up
Should we ship zlib for systems that don't have it, or require
people to install it separately?
Apparently this will make us incompatible with versions of rsync
that use the patched version of rsync. Probably the simplest way to
do this is to just disable gzip (with a warning) when talking to old
versions.
logging
Perhaps flush stdout after each filename, so that people trying to
monitor progress in a log file can do so more easily. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=48108
At the connections that just get a list of modules are not logged,
but they should be.
If a child of the rsync daemon dies with a signal, we should notice
that when we reap it and log a message.
Keep stderr and stdout properly separated (Debian #23626)
After we get the @RSYNCD greeting from the server, we know it's
version but we have not yet sent the command line, so we could just
remove the -z option if the server is too old.
For ssh invocation it's not so simple, because we actually use the
command line to start the remote process. However, we only actually
do compression in token.c, and we could therefore once we discover
the remote version emit an error if it's too old. I'm not sure if
that's a good tradeoff or not.
rsyncd over ssh
There are already some patches to do this.
proxy authentication
Allow RSYNC_PROXY to be http://user:pass@proxy.foo:3128/, and do
HTTP Basic Proxy-Authentication.
Multiple schemes are possible, up to and including the insanity that
is NTLM, but Basic probably covers most cases.
SOCKS
Add --with-socks, and then perhaps a command-line option to put them
on or off. This might be more reliable than LD_PRELOAD hacks.
FAT support
rsync to a FAT partition on a Unix machine doesn't work very well
at the moment. I think we get errors about invalid filenames and
perhaps also trying to do atomic renames.
I guess the code to do this is currently #ifdef'd on Windows; perhaps
we ought to intelligently fall back to it on Unix too.
Better statistics:
<Rasmus> mbp: hey, how about an rsync option that just gives you the
summary without the list of files? And perhaps gives more
information like the number of new files, number of changed,
deleted, etc. ?
<mbp> Rasmus: nice idea
<mbp> there is --stats
<mbp> but at the moment it's very tridge-oriented
<mbp> rather than user-friendly
<mbp> it would be nice to improve it
<mbp> that would also work well with --dryrun
TDB:
Rather than storing the file list in memory, store it in a TDB.
This *might* make memory usage lower while building the file list.
Hashtable lookup will mean files are not transmitted in order,
though... hm.
This would neatly eliminate one of the major post-fork shared data
structures.
chmod:
On 12 Mar 2002, Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> wrote:
> If we would add an option to do that functionality, I would vote for one
> that was more general which could mask off any set of permission bits and
> possibly add any set of bits. Perhaps a chmod-like syntax if it could be
> implemented simply.
I think that would be good too. For example, people uploading files
to a web server might like to say
rsync -avzP --chmod a+rX ./ sourcefrog.net:/home/www/sourcefrog/
Ideally the patch would implement as many of the gnu chmod semantics
as possible. I think the mode parser should be a separate function
that passes back something like (mask,set) description to the rest of
the program. For bonus points there would be a test case for the
parser.
Possibly also --chown
(Debian #23628)
--diff
Allow people to specify the diff command. (Might want to use wdiff,
gnudiff, etc.)
Just diff the temporary file with the destination file, and delete
the tmp file rather than moving it into place.
Interaction with --partial.
Security interactions with daemon mode?
(Suggestion from david.e.sewell)
Incorrect timestamps (Debian #100295)
A bit hard to believe, but apparently it happens.
Check "refuse options works"
We need a test case for this...
Was this broken when we changed to popt?
PERFORMANCE ----------------------------------------------------------
MD4 file_sum
If we're doing a local transfer, or using -W, then perhaps don't
send the file checksum. If we're doing a local transfer, then
calculating MD4 checksums uses 90% of CPU and is unlikely to be
useful.
Indeed for transfers over zlib or ssh we can also rely on the
transport to have quite strong protection against corruption.
Perhaps we should have an option to disable this, analogous to
--whole-file, although it would default to disabled. The file
checksum takes up a definite space in the protocol -- we can either
set it to 0, or perhaps just leave it out.
MD4
Perhaps borrow an assembler MD4 from someone?
Make sure we call MD4 with properly-sized blocks whenever possible
to avoid copying into the residue region?
String area code
Test whether this is actually faster than just using malloc(). If
it's not (anymore), throw it out.
PLATFORMS ------------------------------------------------------------
Win32
Don't detach, because this messes up --srvany.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00234.html
According to "Effective TCP/IP Programming" (??) close() on a socket
has incorrect behaviour on Windows -- it sends a RST packet to the
other side, which gives a "connection reset by peer" error. On that
platform we should probably do shutdown() instead. However, on Unix
we are correct to call close(), because shutdown() discards
untransmitted data.
DEVELOPMENT ----------------------------------------------------------
Splint
Build rsync with SPLINT to try to find security holes. Add
annotations as necessary. Keep track of the number of warnings
found initially, and see how many of them are real bugs, or real
security bugs. Knowing the percentage of likely hits would be
really interesting for other projects.
Torture test
Something that just keeps running rsync continuously over a data set
likely to generate problems.
Cross-testing
Run current rsync versions against significant past releases.
Memory debugger
jra recommends Valgrind:
http://devel-home.kde.org/~sewardj/
Release script
Update spec files
Build tar file; upload
Send announcement to mailing list and c.o.l.a.
Make freshmeat announcement
Update web site
TESTING --------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-test versions
Part of the regression suite should be making sure that we don't
break backwards compatibility: old clients vs new servers and so
on. Ideally we would test both up and down from the current release
to all old versions.
We might need to omit broken old versions, or versions in which
particular functionality is broken
It might be sufficient to test downloads from well-known public
rsync servers running different versions of rsync. This will give
some testing and also be the most common case for having different
versions and not being able to upgrade.
Test on kernel source
Download all versions of kernel; unpack, sync between them. Also
sync between uncompressed tarballs. Compare directories after
transfer.
Use local mode; ssh; daemon; --whole-file and --no-whole-file.
Use awk to pull out the 'speedup' number for each transfer. Make
sure it is >= x.
Test large files
Sparse and non-sparse
Mutator program
Insert bytes, delete bytes, swap blocks, ...
configure option to enable dangerous tests
If tests are skipped, say why.
Test daemon feature to disallow particular options.
Pipe program that makes slow/jerky connections.
Versions of read() and write() that corrupt the stream, or abruptly fail
Separate makefile target to run rough tests -- or perhaps just run
them every time?
Test "refuse options" works
What about for --recursive?
If you specify an unrecognized option here, you should get an error.
DOCUMENTATION --------------------------------------------------------
Update README
Keep list of open issues and todos on the web site
Update web site from CVS
Perhaps redo manual as SGML
The man page is getting rather large, and there is more information
that ought to be added.
TexInfo source is probably a dying format.
Linuxdoc looks like the most likely contender. I know DocBook is
favoured by some people, but it's so bloody verbose, even with emacs
support.
BUILD FARM -----------------------------------------------------------
Add machines
AMDAHL UTS (Dave Dykstra)
Cygwin (on different versions of Win32?)
HP-UX variants (via HP?)
SCO
LOGGING --------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps flush stdout after each filename, so that people trying to
monitor progress in a log file can do so more easily. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=48108
At the connections that just get a list of modules are not logged,
but they should be.
If a child of the rsync daemon dies with a signal, we should notice
that when we reap it and log a message.
Keep stderr and stdout properly separated (Debian #23626)
Use a separate function for reporting errors; prefix it with
"rsync:" or "rsync(remote)", or perhaps even "rsync(local
generator): ".
verbose output
Indicate whether files are new, updated, or deleted
At end of transfer, show how many files were or were not transferred
correctly.
-vv
Explain *why* every file is transferred or not (e.g. "local mtime
123123 newer than 1283198")
debugging of daemon
Add an rsyncd.conf parameter to turn on debugging on the server.
NICE -----------------------------------------------------------------
--no-detach and --no-fork options
Very useful for debugging. Also good when running under a
daemon-monitoring process that tries to restart the service when the
parent exits.
hang/timeout friendliness
internationalization
Change to using gettext(). Probably need to ship this for platforms
that don't have it.
Solicit translations.
Does anyone care? Before we bother modifying the code, we ought to
get the manual translated first, because that's possibly more useful
and at any rate demonstrates desire.
rsyncsh
Write a small emulation of interactive ftp as a Pythonn program
that calls rsync. Commands such as "cd", "ls", "ls *.c" etc map
fairly directly into rsync commands: it just needs to remember the
current host, directory and so on. We can probably even do
completion of remote filenames.
RELATED PROJECTS -----------------------------------------------------
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/
rsyncable gzip patch
Exhaustive, tortuous testing
Cleanups?
rsyncsplit as alternative to real integration with gzip?
reverse rsync over HTTP Range
Goswin Brederlow suggested this on Debian; I think tridge and I
talked about it previous in relation to rproxy.
|