Copy struct library.should_activate_latent on clone

- I don't think it makes actual difference, as the only consumer of this
  symbol is proc_add_library, and that's not called from proc_clone (the
  clone is done by directly iterating the library list).  But the code is
  more obviously right this way.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/library.c b/library.c
index a0cd860..7fb14c1 100644
--- a/library.c
+++ b/library.c
@@ -525,6 +525,7 @@ library_clone(struct library *retp, struct library *lib)
 	library_set_pathname(retp, pathname, lib->own_pathname);
 
 	retp->key = lib->key;
+	retp->should_activate_latent = lib->should_activate_latent;
 
 	/* Clone symbols.  */
 	{