diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/gl/stdbool.in.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/gl/stdbool.in.h | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/gl/stdbool.in.h b/lib/gl/stdbool.in.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2fa4672 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/gl/stdbool.in.h @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +/* Copyright (C) 2001-2003, 2006-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + Written by Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>, 2001. + + This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as + published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the + License, or (at your option) any later version. + + This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License + along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ + +#ifndef _GL_STDBOOL_H +#define _GL_STDBOOL_H + +/* ISO C 99 <stdbool.h> for platforms that lack it. */ + +/* Usage suggestions: + + Programs that use <stdbool.h> should be aware of some limitations + and standards compliance issues. + + Standards compliance: + + - <stdbool.h> must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true' + can be used. + + - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1. + + - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false, + as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature". + + Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment: + + - <stdbool.h> must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used. + + - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro. + + - Bit-fields of type 'bool' are not supported. Portable code + should use 'unsigned int foo : 1;' rather than 'bool foo : 1;'. + + - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are + performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted + to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'. This doesn't work + with this substitute. With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1 + give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'. + + - C99 allows the use of (_Bool)0.0 in constant expressions, but + this substitute cannot always provide this property. + + Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool'; + this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common. */ + + +/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */ + +#ifdef __cplusplus +# define _Bool bool +# define bool bool +#else +# if !defined __GNUC__ + /* If @HAVE__BOOL@: + Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when + the built-in _Bool type is used. See + https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html + https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html + https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html + Similar bugs are likely with other compilers as well; this file + wouldn't be used if <stdbool.h> was working. + So we override the _Bool type. + If !@HAVE__BOOL@: + Need to define _Bool ourselves. As 'signed char' or as an enum type? + Use of a typedef, with SunPRO C, leads to a stupid + "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99". + Use of an enum type, with IRIX cc, leads to a stupid + "warning(1185): enumerated type mixed with another type". + Even the existence of an enum type, without a typedef, + "Invalid enumerator. (badenum)" with HP-UX cc on Tru64. + The only benefit of the enum, debuggability, is not important + with these compilers. So use 'signed char' and no enum. */ +# define _Bool signed char +# else + /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it. */ +# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ + /* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as + enum constants, not only as macros. + It is tempting to write + typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; + so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But then + values of type '_Bool' might promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int' + (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int' + (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)). So add a negative value to the + enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'. */ +typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; +# endif +# endif +# define bool _Bool +#endif + +/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +# define false false +# define true true +#else +# define false 0 +# define true 1 +#endif + +#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1 + +#endif /* _GL_STDBOOL_H */ |