platform/upstream/lapack - Domain: System / Base; Licenses: ETC;

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2011-11-11	Update version number to 3.4.0	julie	1	-1/+1

2011-11-03	Cosmetic changes in Doxygen presentation.	julie	1	-24/+26
	Use \par instead of \details for section. add a Contributors Section and a Reference Section. Remove (some) verbatim section when not needed. Those changes have been done by hand so I am not sure I manage to catch them all.
2011-11-01	Last commit related to Doxygen integration following Albert's comment	julie	1	-1/+3

2011-10-31	Correct Warning detected during Doxygen Generation.	julie	1	-12/+6
	Now each routine should have the correct list of arguments. This allowed to detect and fix problems in parameter description of many routines.
2011-10-13	adding link to individual download, the links will appear directly in ↵	julie	1	-0/+8
	Doxygen html documentation
2011-10-06	Integrating Doxygen in comments	julie	1	-365/+468

2011-04-13	Upadte header for the modified routine for the 3.3.1 release	julie	1	-2/+2

2011-03-17	While looking if bug0022 was corrected, found that some comments were not ↵	julie	1	-35/+56
	updated bug0022 was indeed corrected by Zlatko
2011-03-10	Formating code, use of * for comment, and follow other LAPACK style	julie	1	-83/+83

2010-11-08	Start getting ready for the release	julie	1	-2/+2

2010-08-25	Included bug fix provided by Zlatco on Jacobi SVD	julie	1	-10/+11
	Email from Zlatco on August 24th 2010: The problem that was reported (with zero matrix) is caused by bad initialization to xLASSQ. It should be ZERO, ONE and not ZERO, ZERO. In fact, I had it ZERO, ONE throughout the complete development of the code and decided to change it to ZERO, ZERO a the very end to make it "more elegant". That was stupid, because xLASSQ does not touch those variables in case of zero vector, leaving scaling at ZERO, and in the nonzero case the scaling is between ONE and SQRT(N). So, in case of zero vector, division by a variable that is normally bigger than ONE causes division by zero. I have corrected that and few other things, stress tested the code and it should be OK now. README: i) In xgejsv.f and xgesvj.f input parameters SCALE and SUMSQ in xlassq.f are now initially set as SCALE = ZERO, SUMSQ=ONE. Setting them both to zero (without carefully reading xlassq.f) caused problems with exactly zero columns. ii) There was a problem in the branch that computes only SIGMA and U of a rank deficient matrix. The computed numerical rank (NR) was incorrectly written as N in parameter lists of the corresponding calls. iii) In xgsvj0.f, xgsvj1.f testing the input parameters is changed to prevent unnecessarily negative INFO in some situations. iv) Minor changes, renaming some variables etc.
2010-06-23	Update date and version for 3.2.2 release	julie	1	-2/+2

2009-09-11	Fix whitespace comments detected from parser	julie	1	-33/+33

2009-04-16	Big commit before 3.2.1 release.	julie	1	-2/+2
	Those are just cosmetic changes to update version number and various other minor change.
2009-01-02	Last round of modifications to the comments for the generation of the manpages	julie	1	-198/+191

2008-12-16	(no commit message)	julie	1	-0/+1653