| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This is really old school, but a lot of times we have users sending us
copy pasting of codes, and that is the only way to know the version of
the code.
|
|
This is mostly a long term maintenance improvement.
Many coding styles require elimination of trailing whitespace, and
many editors and source code management configurations automatically
gobble up whitespace. When these tools gobble up whitespace, it
complicates reviewing the meaningful code changes.
By removing whitespace on one patch, it makes future
code reviews much easier.
=SCRIPT====================================================================
if which tempfile &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=tempfile
elif which mktemp &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=mktemp
else
echo "Cannot find tempfile program." 2>&1
exit 1
fi
MYTEMP=$($TEMPMAKER)
trap 'rm -f $MYTEMP' SIGINT SIGTERM
stripit() {
echo "stripping $1"
sed 's/[ \t]*$//' "$1" > $MYTEMP
cp $MYTEMP "$1"
}
if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
while [ "$1" != "" ]; do
stripit $1
shift
done
else
while read -t 2; do
stripit $REPLY
done
fi
rm $MYTEMP
=================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix bug bug0088 reported by Mike Pont from NAG on the forum
(see http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2893)
Actually there were a lot of problems regarding arguments checking.
I tried to correct most of them.
Apply the fix propose to all x[he/sy]rfsx.f routines
- Use IGNORE_CWISE as suggested to prevent use of unitialize variable PARAMS
I also appied the previous TESTING fix to all routines
INFO has new value in ZHERFSX (see description of INFO between ZHESVX and ZHESVXX)
This is set on line 634 (IF ( INFO .LE. N ) INFO = N + J) of zherfsx.f
And this is not handled by the testing LIN/zdrvhex.f
I just add .AND. INFO.LE.N at line 638 to avoid raising an error when INFO = N + J
At the moment, I would recommand a further look at those routines.
ZHE, ZSY led to 182 Tests failing to pass the threshold
and the same for complex
better than before, but still....
|
|
|
|
Use \par instead of \details for section.
add a Contributors Section and a Reference Section.
Remove (some) verbatim section when not needed.
Those changes have been done by hand so I am not sure I manage to catch them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doxygen html documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2010 to "lapack@cs.utk.edu".
Issue in LAPACK 3.2.1 *la_{po,sy,he}rfsx_extended.f sources. For instanse, in sla_syrfsx_extended.f:
DY is described as
* DY (input) REAL array, dimension (N)
* Workspace to hold the intermediate solution.
whereas N-by-NRHS array is referenced at DY due to the following statement (line 384):
CALL SSYTRS( UPLO, N, NRHS, AF, LDAF, IPIV, DY, N, INFO )
This may lead to an outside memory corruption. I assume one RHS should be referenced here, because all the RHSs are considered individually in the loop by J. That is, substituting NRHS by 1:
CALL SSYTRS( UPLO, N, 1, AF, LDAF, IPIV, DY, N, INFO )
should fix the issue. This is actual for any subroutine mentioned.
|
|
Those are just cosmetic changes to update version number and various other minor change.
|
|
Other cosmetic changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://jason@icl.cs.utk.edu/svn/lapack-dev/lapack/branches/SC08-release
........
r609 | julie | 2008-12-16 17:17:52 -0500 (Tue, 16 Dec 2008) | 1 line
Polish routines to fit the LAPACK framework and allow manpages generation
........
r610 | langou | 2008-12-19 12:12:38 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 30 lines
bug reported on the forum
https://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=854
the complete thread is available at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93#
Tobias Burnus also sent us an email:
> Hello,
>
> this was reported at
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93#
>
> The problem is the line 47:
>
> 47: IF( M.EQ.0 .OR. A(M, 1).NE.ZERO .OR. A(M, N).NE.ZERO ) THEN
>
> If M == 0 the one accesses A(0,1) which is invalid as the lower bound is 1
> and not 0.
>
> Note: Contrary to C there is no left-to-right evaluation of expressions in
> Fortran; the order is left to the compiler. One might assume that a smart
> compiler does not evaluate "A(M,1)" if "M==0", however, there is nothing in
> the standard guarantees this.
>
> If bounds checks are turned on (see post at the URL above), gfortran aborts
> with an out-of-bounds error.
........
r611 | julie | 2008-12-19 15:00:58 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 5 lines
Modify the formatting of the comments.
Replace Note and Notes section by Further Details
This allow the manpages to be generated corectly.
........
r612 | julie | 2008-12-19 16:29:21 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 3 lines
Reformat the xblas routines comments to be able to generate the manpages
........
r613 | julie | 2008-12-19 16:30:31 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 1 line
Update version number
........
r614 | jason | 2008-12-27 09:44:45 -0500 (Sat, 27 Dec 2008) | 13 lines
Fix non-short-circuited tests in ILAxL{C,R}.
Fortran doesn't short-circuit logical operators, so the check that the leading
dimension /= 0 may not prevent indexing into a 0-length array.
Reported by "hes selex" in
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93
and forwarded to the LAPACK maintainers by Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>.
Chalk up more bugs found by gfortran's diagnostics!
Signed-off-by: Jason Riedy <ejr@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
........
|
|
|
