blob: e18ed19abc8904624576bcdf72ce84274b900359 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
<refentry xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
xmlns:src="http://nwalsh.com/xmlns/litprog/fragment"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
version="5.0" xml:id="glossary.as.blocks">
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>glossary.as.blocks</refentrytitle>
<refmiscinfo class="other" otherclass="datatype">boolean</refmiscinfo>
</refmeta>
<refnamediv>
<refname>glossary.as.blocks</refname>
<refpurpose>Present glossarys using blocks instead of lists?</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
<src:fragment xml:id="glossary.as.blocks.frag">
<xsl:param name="glossary.as.blocks" select="0"/>
</src:fragment>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsection><info><title>Description</title></info>
<para>If non-zero, <tag>glossary</tag>s will be formatted as
blocks.</para>
<para>If you have long <tag>glossterm</tag>s, proper list
markup in the FO case may produce unattractive lists. By setting this
parameter, you can force the stylesheets to produce block markup
instead of proper lists.</para>
<para>You can override this setting with a processing instruction as the
child of <tag>glossary</tag>: <tag class="xmlpi">dbfo
glossary-presentation="blocks"</tag> or <tag class="xmlpi">dbfo
glossary-presentation="list"</tag></para>
</refsection>
</refentry>
|
