summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs')
-rw-r--r--tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs148
1 files changed, 148 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs b/tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..660627cc72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/src/JIT/Performance/CodeQuality/Inlining/InlineGCStruct.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
+// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.
+// See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information.
+
+// In CoreCLR String.Format(ref, ref) is small and readily inlined.
+// The inline introduces a System.Parms GC struct local which is
+// untracked and must be zero initialized in the prolog. When the
+// inlined callsite is in a cold path, the inline hurts performance.
+//
+// There are two test methods below, one of which calls String.Format
+// on a cold path and the other which has similar structure but
+// does not call String.Format. Expectation is that they will have
+// similar performance.
+//
+// See https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues/7569 for context.
+
+using Microsoft.Xunit.Performance;
+using System;
+using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
+using Xunit;
+
+[assembly: OptimizeForBenchmarks]
+[assembly: MeasureInstructionsRetired]
+
+namespace Inlining
+{
+public class InlineGCStruct
+{
+#if DEBUG
+ public const int Iterations = 1;
+#else
+ public const int Iterations = 2500000;
+#endif
+
+ [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
+ public static int FastFunctionNotCallingStringFormat(int param)
+ {
+ if (param < 0)
+ {
+ throw new Exception(String.Format("We do not like the value {0:N0}.", param));
+ }
+
+ if (param == int.MaxValue)
+ {
+ throw new Exception(String.Format("{0:N0} is maxed out.", param));
+ }
+
+ if (param > int.MaxValue / 2)
+ {
+ throw new Exception(String.Format("We do not like the value {0:N0} either.", param));
+ }
+
+ return param * 2;
+ }
+
+ [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
+ public static int FastFunctionNotHavingStringFormat(int param)
+ {
+ if (param < 0)
+ {
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("param", "We do not like this value.");
+ }
+
+ if (param == int.MaxValue)
+ {
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("param", "Maxed out.");
+ }
+
+ if (param > int.MaxValue / 2)
+ {
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("param", "We do not like this value either.");
+ }
+
+ return param * 2;
+ }
+
+ [Benchmark]
+ public static bool WithFormat()
+ {
+ int result = 0;
+
+ foreach (var iteration in Benchmark.Iterations)
+ {
+ using (iteration.StartMeasurement())
+ {
+ for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
+ {
+ result |= FastFunctionNotCallingStringFormat(11);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return (result == 22);
+ }
+
+ [Benchmark]
+ public static bool WithoutFormat()
+ {
+ int result = 0;
+
+ foreach (var iteration in Benchmark.Iterations)
+ {
+ using (iteration.StartMeasurement())
+ {
+ for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
+ {
+ result |= FastFunctionNotHavingStringFormat(11);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return (result == 22);
+ }
+
+ public static bool WithoutFormatBase()
+ {
+ int result = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
+ {
+ result |= FastFunctionNotHavingStringFormat(11);
+ }
+
+ return (result == 22);
+ }
+
+ public static bool WithFormatBase()
+ {
+ int result = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
+ {
+ result |= FastFunctionNotCallingStringFormat(11);
+ }
+
+ return (result == 22);
+ }
+
+ public static int Main()
+ {
+ bool withFormat = WithFormatBase();
+ bool withoutFormat = WithoutFormatBase();
+
+ return (withFormat && withoutFormat ? 100 : -1);
+ }
+}
+}
+