summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp80
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp b/src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c263a6cdc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/pal/tests/palsuite/miscellaneous/InterlockedCompareExchangePointer/test1/test.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
+// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.
+// See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information.
+
+/*============================================================
+**
+** Source: test.c
+**
+** Purpose: Test for InterlockedCompareExchangePointer() function
+**
+**
+**=========================================================*/
+
+/* This test is FINISHED. Note: The biggest feature of this function is that
+ it locks the value before it increments it -- in order to make it so only
+ one thread can access it. But, I really don't have a great test to
+ make sure it's thread safe. Any ideas?
+*/
+
+#include <palsuite.h>
+
+int __cdecl main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+
+ long StartValue = 5;
+ long NewValue = 10;
+ PVOID ReturnValue = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize the PAL and return FAILURE if this fails
+ */
+
+ if(0 != (PAL_Initialize(argc, argv)))
+ {
+ return FAIL;
+ }
+
+ ReturnValue = InterlockedCompareExchangePointer((PVOID)&StartValue,
+ (PVOID)NewValue,
+ (PVOID)StartValue);
+
+ /* StartValue and NewValue should be equal now */
+ if(StartValue != NewValue)
+ {
+ Fail("ERROR: These values should be equal after the exchange. "
+ "They should both be %d, however the value that should have "
+ "been exchanged is %d.\n",NewValue,StartValue);
+ }
+
+ /* Returnvalue should have been set to what 'StartValue' was
+ (5 in this case)
+ */
+
+ if((int)(size_t)ReturnValue != 5)
+ {
+ Fail("ERROR: The return value should be the value of the "
+ "variable before the exchange took place, which was 5. "
+ "But, the return value was %d.\n",ReturnValue);
+ }
+
+ /* This is a mismatch, so no exchange should happen */
+ InterlockedCompareExchangePointer((PVOID)&StartValue,
+ ReturnValue,
+ ReturnValue);
+ if(StartValue != NewValue)
+ {
+ Fail("ERROR: The compare should have failed and no exchange should "
+ "have been made, but it seems the exchange still happened.\n");
+ }
+
+
+ PAL_Terminate();
+ return PASS;
+}
+
+
+
+
+
+