summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3')
-rw-r--r--Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.dllbin0 -> 671264 bytes
-rw-r--r--Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.xml507
2 files changed, 507 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.dll b/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.dll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c71779f4bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.dll
Binary files differ
diff --git a/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.xml b/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..4a84545e81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Tools/dotnetcli/sdk/NuGetFallbackFolder/microsoft.codeanalysis.csharp.workspaces/2.3.1/lib/netstandard1.3/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,507 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<doc>
+ <assembly>
+ <name>Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces</name>
+ </assembly>
+ <members>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Classification.ClassificationHelpers.GetClassification(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Determine the classification type for a given token.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="token">The token.</param>
+ <returns>The correct syntactic classification for the token.</returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Classification.Worker">
+ <summary>
+ Worker is an utility class that can classify a list of tokens or a tree within a
+ requested span The implementation is generic and can produce any kind of classification
+ artifacts T T is normally either ClassificationSpan or a Tuple (for testing purposes)
+ and constructed via provided factory.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeGeneration.CSharpSyntaxGenerator.ShiftTrivia(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode)">
+ <summary>
+ Moves the trailing trivia from the node's previous token to the end of the node
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeGeneration.CSharpSyntaxGenerator.ParenthesizeLeft(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax)">
+ <summary>
+ Parenthesize the left hand size of a member access, invocation or element access expression
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsImplicitTypePreferred(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Options.OptionSet,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Given an expression of assignment, answers whether the declaration
+ can use var keyword, by looking at the user's style preferences
+ obtained from options and the context obtained from the expression.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsBuiltInType(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Given an expression of assignment, answers if its type is
+ considered an intrinsic predefined type.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsTypeApparentInAssignmentExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStylePreference,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Threading.CancellationToken,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol)">
+ <summary>
+ Analyzes if type information is obvious to the reader by simply looking at the assignment expression.
+ </summary>
+ <remarks>
+ <paramref name="typeInDeclaration"/> accepts null, to be able to cater to codegen features
+ that are about to generate a local declaration and do not have this information to pass in.
+ Things (like analyzers) that do have a local declaration already, should pass this in.
+ </remarks>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsPossibleCreationMethod(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.IMethodSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol)">
+ <summary>
+ Looks for types that have static methods that return the same type as the container.
+ e.g: int.Parse, XElement.Load, Tuple.Create etc.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsPossibleConversionMethod(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.IMethodSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ If we have a method ToXXX and its return type is also XXX, then type name is apparent
+ e.g: Convert.ToString.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle.TypeStyle.TypeStyleHelper.IsContainerTypeEqualToReturnType(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.IMethodSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol)">
+ <remarks>
+ If there are type arguments on either side of assignment, we match type names instead of type equality
+ to account for inferred generic type arguments.
+ e.g: Tuple.Create(0, true) returns Tuple&lt;X,y&gt; which isn't the same as type Tuple.
+ otherwise, we match for type equivalence
+ </remarks>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Simplification.CSharpInferredMemberNameReducer">
+ <summary>
+ Complexify makes inferred names explicit for tuple elements and anonymous type members. This
+ class considers which ones of those can be simplified (after the refactoring was done).
+ If the inferred name of the member matches, the explicit name (from Complexify) can be removed.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Simplification.CSharpSimplificationService.NodesAndTokensToReduceComputer.Compute(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode,System.Func{Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNodeOrToken,System.Boolean})">
+ <summary>
+ Computes a list of nodes and tokens that need to be reduced in the given syntax root.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SemanticModelExtensions.DecomposeName(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax@,System.String@,System.Int32@)">
+ <summary>
+ Decomposes a name or member access expression into its component parts.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="expression">The name or member access expression.</param>
+ <param name="qualifier">The qualifier (or left-hand-side) of the name expression. This may be null if there is no qualifier.</param>
+ <param name="name">The name of the expression.</param>
+ <param name="arity">The number of generic type parameters.</param>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SemanticModelExtensions.GenerateNameForArgument(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ArgumentSyntax,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Given an argument node, tries to generate an appropriate name that can be used for that
+ argument.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SemanticModelExtensions.GenerateNameForExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,System.Boolean,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Given an expression node, tries to generate an appropriate name that can be used for
+ that expression.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ArgumentSyntaxExtensions.DetermineParameter(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ArgumentSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Boolean,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns the parameter to which this argument is passed. If <paramref name="allowParams"/>
+ is true, the last parameter will be returned if it is params parameter and the index of
+ the specified argument is greater than the number of parameters.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ContextQuery.SyntaxTreeExtensions.IsPossibleTupleContext(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxTree,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken,System.Int32)">
+ <summary>
+ Are you possibly typing a tuple type or expression?
+ This is used to suppress colon as a completion trigger (so that you can type element names).
+ This is also used to recommend some keywords (like var).
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ContextQuery.SyntaxTreeExtensions.IsPossibleDeconstructionDesignation(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxTree,System.Int32,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Are you possibly in the designation part of a deconstruction?
+ This is used to enter suggestion mode (suggestions become soft-selected).
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ContextQuery.SyntaxTreeExtensions.UnwrapPossibleTuple(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode)">
+ <summary>
+ If inside a parenthesized or tuple expression, unwrap the nestings and return the container.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.CastIfPossible(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ITypeSymbol,System.Int32,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel)">
+ <summary>
+ Adds to <paramref name="targetType"/> if it does not contain an anonymous
+ type and binds to the same type at the given <paramref name="position"/>.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.IsReplacementCandidate(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SymbolInfo,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray{Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ISymbol},System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray{Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ISymbol})">
+ <summary>
+ Determines if <paramref name="speculativeSymbols"/> and <paramref name="speculativeNamespacesAndTypes"/>
+ together contain a superset of the symbols in <paramref name="actualSymbol"/>.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.CandidateSymbolEqualityComparer">
+ <summary>
+ Compares symbols by their original definition.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.IsPartOfNamespaceDeclarationName(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode)">
+ <summary>
+ Checks if the SyntaxNode is a name of a namespace declaration. To be a namespace name, the syntax
+ must be parented by an namespace declaration and the node itself must be equal to the declaration's Name
+ property.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="node"></param>
+ <returns></returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.HidingTypeParameterSymbolExists(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ISymbol,System.Collections.Generic.List{Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ISymbol})">
+ <summary>
+ Returns True if enclosingTypeParametersInsideOut contains a symbol with the same name as the candidateSymbol
+ thereby saying that there exists a symbol which hides the candidate Symbol
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.IsMemberAccessADynamicInvocation(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.MemberAccessExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel)">
+ <summary>
+ Tells if the Member access is the starting part of a Dynamic Invocation
+ </summary>
+ <param name="memberAccess"></param>
+ <param name="semanticModel"></param>
+ <returns>Return true, if the member access is the starting point of a Dynamic Invocation</returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.GetPredefinedKeywordKind(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SpecialType)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns the predefined keyword kind for a given <see cref="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SpecialType"/>.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="specialType">The <see cref="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SpecialType"/> of this type.</param>
+ <returns>The keyword kind for a given special type, or SyntaxKind.None if the type name is not a predefined type.</returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ITypeSymbolExtensions.TypeSyntaxGeneratorVisitor.AddGlobalAlias(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.INamespaceOrTypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.SimpleNameSyntax)">
+ <summary>
+ We always unilaterally add "global::" to all named types/namespaces. This
+ will then be trimmed off if possible by calls to
+ <see cref="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Simplification.Simplifier.ReduceAsync(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Document,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Options.OptionSet,System.Threading.CancellationToken)"/>
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.OperatorPrecedence">
+ <summary>
+ Operator precedence classes from section 7.3.1 of the C# language specification.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxKindExtensions.Contains(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind[],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind)">
+ <summary>
+ Determine if the given <see cref="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind"/> array contains the given kind.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="kinds">Array to search</param>
+ <param name="kind">Sought value</param>
+ <returns>True if <paramref name = "kinds"/> contains the value<paramref name= "kind"/>.</returns>
+ <remarks>PERF: Not using Array.IndexOf here because it results in a call to IndexOf on the
+ default EqualityComparer for SyntaxKind.The default comparer for SyntaxKind is the
+ ObjectEqualityComparer which results in boxing allocations.</remarks>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxNodeExtensions.GetEnclosingUsingDirectives(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns the list of using directives that affect <paramref name="node"/>. The list will be returned in
+ top down order.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxNodeExtensions.GetAllPrecedingTriviaToPreviousToken(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Text.SourceText,System.Boolean)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns all of the trivia to the left of this token up to the previous token (concatenates
+ the previous token's trailing trivia and this token's leading trivia).
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxNodeExtensions.ContainsInterleavedDirective(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode,System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns true if the passed in node contains an interleaved pp directive.
+
+ i.e. The following returns false:
+
+ void Foo() {
+ #if true
+ #endif
+ }
+
+ #if true
+ void Foo() {
+ }
+ #endif
+
+ but these return true:
+
+ #if true
+ void Foo() {
+ #endif
+ }
+
+ void Foo() {
+ #if true
+ }
+ #endif
+
+ #if true
+ void Foo() {
+ #else
+ }
+ #endif
+
+ i.e. the method returns true if it contains a PP directive that belongs to a grouping
+ constructs (like #if/#endif or #region/#endregion), but the grouping construct isn't
+ entirely contained within the span of the node.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxNodeExtensions.SplitNodesOnPreprocessorBoundaries``1(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable{``0},System.Threading.CancellationToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Breaks up the list of provided nodes, based on how they are interspersed with pp
+ directives, into groups. Within these groups nodes can be moved around safely, without
+ breaking any pp constructs.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxNodeExtensions.ChildThatContainsPosition(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode,System.Int32,System.Int32@)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns child node or token that contains given position.
+ </summary>
+ <remarks>
+ This is a copy of <see cref="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode.ChildThatContainsPosition(System.Int32)"/> that also returns the index of the child node.
+ </remarks>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxTokenExtensions.IsFirstTokenOnLine(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Text.SourceText)">
+ <summary>
+ Determines whether the given SyntaxToken is the first token on a line in the specified SourceText.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxTokenExtensions.GetAllTrailingTrivia(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Retrieves all trivia after this token, including it's trailing trivia and
+ the leading trivia of the next token.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxTokenExtensions.FindLastTokenOfPartialGenericName(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Lexically, find the last token that looks like it's part of this generic name.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="genericIdentifier">The "name" of the generic identifier, last token before
+ the "&amp;"</param>
+ <returns>The last token in the name</returns>
+ <remarks>This is related to the code in <see cref="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxTreeExtensions.IsInPartiallyWrittenGeneric(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxTree,System.Int32,System.Threading.CancellationToken)"/></remarks>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.SyntaxTokenExtensions.CouldBeKeyword(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Returns true if this token is something that looks like a C# keyword. This includes
+ actual keywords, contextual keywords, and even 'var' and 'dynamic'
+ </summary>
+ <param name="token"></param>
+ <returns></returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.TypeSyntaxExtensions.IsTypeInferred(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.TypeSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel)">
+ <summary>
+ Determines whether the specified TypeSyntax is actually 'var'.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.LabelPositionOptions.LeftMost">
+ Placed in the Zeroth column of the text editor
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.LabelPositionOptions.OneLess">
+ Placed at one less indent to the current context
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.LabelPositionOptions.NoIndent">
+ Placed at the same indent as the current context
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.BinaryOperatorSpacingOptions.Single">
+ Single Spacing
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.BinaryOperatorSpacingOptions.Ignore">
+ Ignore Formatting
+ </member>
+ <member name="F:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.BinaryOperatorSpacingOptions.Remove">
+ Remove Spacing
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.FormattingResult">
+ <summary>
+ this holds onto changes made by formatting engine.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.TriviaDataFactory">
+ <summary>
+ trivia factory.
+
+ it will cache some commonly used trivia to reduce memory footprint and heap allocation
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.TriviaDataFactory.ComplexTrivia">
+ <summary>
+ represents a general trivia between two tokens. slightly more expensive than others since it
+ needs to calculate stuff unlike other cases
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Formatting.FormattingHelpers.IsOpenParenInVarDeconstructionDeclaration(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Checks whether currentToken is the opening paren of a deconstruction-declaration in var form, such as `var (x, y) = ...`
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources">
+ <summary>
+ A strongly-typed resource class, for looking up localized strings, etc.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.ResourceManager">
+ <summary>
+ Returns the cached ResourceManager instance used by this class.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Culture">
+ <summary>
+ Overrides the current thread's CurrentUICulture property for all
+ resource lookups using this strongly typed resource class.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Cannot_retrieve_the_Span_of_a_null_syntax_reference">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Cannot retrieve the Span of a null syntax reference..
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Expected_string_or_char_literal">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Expected string or char literal.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Implement_Interface">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Implement Interface.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Namespace_can_not_be_added_in_this_destination">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Namespace can not be added in this destination..
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.No_available_location_found_to_add_statements_to">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to No available location found to add statements to..
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Node_does_not_descend_from_root">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Node does not descend from root..
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Node_not_in_parent_s_child_list">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Node not in parent&apos;s child list.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Only_attributes_constructor_initializers_expressions_or_statements_can_be_made_explicit">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Only attributes, constructor initializers, expressions or statements can be made explicit.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="P:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpWorkspaceResources.Trivia_is_not_associated_with_token">
+ <summary>
+ Looks up a localized string similar to Trivia is not associated with token.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxFactsService.GetSuffix(System.Char,System.Char,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList{Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ParameterSyntax})">
+ <summary>
+ Builds up the suffix to show for something with parameters in navigate-to.
+ While it would be nice to just use the compiler SymbolDisplay API for this,
+ it would be too expensive as it requires going back to Symbols (which requires
+ creating compilations, etc.) in a perf sensitive area.
+
+ So, instead, we just build a reasonable suffix using the pure syntax that a
+ user provided. That means that if they wrote "Method(System.Int32 i)" we'll
+ show that as "Method(System.Int32)" not "Method(int)". Given that this is
+ actually what the user wrote, and it saves us from ever having to go back to
+ symbols/compilations, this is well worth it, even if it does mean we have to
+ create our own 'symbol display' logic here.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryServiceFactory.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryService.PathSyntaxReference">
+ <summary>
+ Represents a syntax reference that doesn't actually hold onto the
+ referenced node. Instead, enough data is held onto so that the node
+ can be recovered and returned if necessary.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryServiceFactory.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryService.NullSyntaxReference">
+ <summary>
+ Represents a syntax reference that was passed a null
+ reference to a node. In this case, we just hold onto the
+ weak tree reference and throw if any invalid properties
+ are accessed.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryServiceFactory.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryService.PositionalSyntaxReference">
+ <summary>
+ Represents a syntax reference that doesn't actually hold onto the
+ referenced node. Instead, enough data is held onto so that the node
+ can be recovered and returned if necessary.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryServiceFactory.CSharpSyntaxTreeFactoryService.RecoverableSyntaxTree">
+ <summary>
+ Represents a syntax tree that only has a weak reference to its
+ underlying data. This way it can be passed around without forcing
+ the underlying full tree to stay alive. Think of it more as a
+ key that can be used to identify a tree rather than the tree itself.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Rename.CSharpRenameConflictLanguageService.GetExpansionTargetForLocation(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken)">
+ <summary>
+ Gets the top most enclosing statement or CrefSyntax as target to call MakeExplicit on.
+ It's either the enclosing statement, or if this statement is inside of a lambda expression, the enclosing
+ statement of this lambda.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="token">The token to get the complexification target for.</param>
+ <returns></returns>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Rename.CSharpRenameConflictLanguageService.GetSemanticModelForNode(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel)">
+ <summary>
+ Gets the semantic model for the given node.
+ If the node belongs to the syntax tree of the original semantic model, then returns originalSemanticModel.
+ Otherwise, returns a speculative model.
+ The assumption for the later case is that span start position of the given node in it's syntax tree is same as
+ the span start of the original node in the original syntax tree.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Utilities.FormattingRangeHelper">
+ <summary>
+ this help finding a range of tokens to format based on given ending token
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="T:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Utilities.SpeculationAnalyzer">
+ <summary>
+ Helper class to analyze the semantic effects of a speculated syntax node replacement on the parenting nodes.
+ Given an expression node from a syntax tree and a new expression from a different syntax tree,
+ it replaces the expression with the new expression to create a speculated syntax tree.
+ It uses the original tree's semantic model to create a speculative semantic model and verifies that
+ the syntax replacement doesn't break the semantics of any parenting nodes of the original expression.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Utilities.SpeculationAnalyzer.#ctor(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Threading.CancellationToken,System.Boolean,System.Boolean)">
+ <summary>
+ Creates a semantic analyzer for speculative syntax replacement.
+ </summary>
+ <param name="expression">Original expression to be replaced.</param>
+ <param name="newExpression">New expression to replace the original expression.</param>
+ <param name="semanticModel">Semantic model of <paramref name="expression"/> node's syntax tree.</param>
+ <param name="cancellationToken">Cancellation token.</param>
+ <param name="skipVerificationForReplacedNode">
+ True if semantic analysis should be skipped for the replaced node and performed starting from parent of the original and replaced nodes.
+ This could be the case when custom verifications are required to be done by the caller or
+ semantics of the replaced expression are different from the original expression.
+ </param>
+ <param name="failOnOverloadResolutionFailuresInOriginalCode">
+ True if semantic analysis should fail when any of the invocation expression ancestors of <paramref name="expression"/> in original code has overload resolution failures.
+ </param>
+ </member>
+ <member name="M:Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Utilities.SpeculationAnalyzer.ReplacementChangesSemanticsOfUnchangedLambda(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.ExpressionSyntax)">
+ <summary>
+ Determines whether performing the syntax replacement in one of the sibling nodes of the given lambda expressions will change the lambda binding semantics.
+ This is done by first determining the lambda parameters whose type differs in the replaced lambda node.
+ For each of these parameters, we find the descendant identifier name nodes in the lambda body and check if semantics of any of the parenting nodes of these
+ identifier nodes have changed in the replaced lambda.
+ </summary>
+ </member>
+ </members>
+</doc>