summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md b/Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md
index 2279c16e37..79116092e9 100644
--- a/Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md
+++ b/Documentation/design-docs/inlining-plans.md
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ overhead. It is anticipated that this work will encompass Machinery,
Ability, and Profitability.
LLILC does no inlining today. Since we aspire to have LLILC be a
-high-performance .Net code generator, we need to enable inlining in
+high-performance .NET code generator, we need to enable inlining in
LLILC. LLILC can likely leverage much of LLVM's built-in inlining
Machinery and Ability, but will need new code for Legality and
Profitability.
-We envision various scenarios for .Net Code generation that impact
+We envision various scenarios for .NET Code generation that impact
inlining: a first-tier JIT compiler, a higher-tier JIT compiler, a
fast AOT compiler, and an optimizing AOT compiler. Each scenario calls
for inlining, but the tradeoffs are different. For a given scenario,
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ xml or json markup):
```
where `[o]` is a successful inline, `[x]` a failed inline, and
-indentation shows the inlining tree. For .Net compilation we'll need
+indentation shows the inlining tree. For .NET compilation we'll need
some kind of persistent ID for methods, which may not be all that easy
to come by.