summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/gc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAditya Mandaleeka <adityamandaleeka@users.noreply.github.com>2017-05-01 22:03:25 -0700
committerJan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>2017-05-01 22:03:25 -0700
commit363206f312a73bbf6c2093d78acad58c060ca0c7 (patch)
treef7d8af0202beafbc028c6fe3ec791232fdfdc49b /src/gc
parent9501a3b59923bf9c1fea780dc97a342692a8c2ea (diff)
downloadcoreclr-363206f312a73bbf6c2093d78acad58c060ca0c7.tar.gz
coreclr-363206f312a73bbf6c2093d78acad58c060ca0c7.tar.bz2
coreclr-363206f312a73bbf6c2093d78acad58c060ca0c7.zip
Fix rgTail corruption in rare scavenging cases [Desktop port]. (#11327)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/gc')
-rw-r--r--src/gc/handletablecore.cpp26
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/gc/handletablecore.cpp b/src/gc/handletablecore.cpp
index 00ab6a24b9..228b8bfa09 100644
--- a/src/gc/handletablecore.cpp
+++ b/src/gc/handletablecore.cpp
@@ -1592,6 +1592,7 @@ void SegmentResortChains(TableSegment *pSegment)
// clear the sort flag for this segment
pSegment->fResortChains = FALSE;
+ BOOL fScavengingOccurred = FALSE;
// first, do we need to scavenge any blocks?
if (pSegment->fNeedsScavenging)
@@ -1599,6 +1600,8 @@ void SegmentResortChains(TableSegment *pSegment)
// clear the scavenge flag
pSegment->fNeedsScavenging = FALSE;
+ fScavengingOccurred = TRUE;
+
// we may need to explicitly scan the user data chain too
BOOL fCleanupUserData = FALSE;
@@ -1758,6 +1761,21 @@ void SegmentResortChains(TableSegment *pSegment)
if (pSegment->rgBlockType[pSegment->rgHint[uType]] != uType)
pSegment->rgHint[uType] = bBlock;
}
+ else
+ {
+ // No blocks of this type were found in the rgBlockType array, meaning either there were no
+ // such blocks on entry to this function (in which case the associated tail is guaranteed
+ // to already be marked invalid) OR that there were blocks but all of them were reclaimed
+ // by the scavenging logic above (in which case the associated tail is guaranteed to point
+ // to one of the scavenged blocks). In the latter case, the tail is currently "stale"
+ // and therefore needs to be manually updated.
+ if (pSegment->rgTail[uType] != BLOCK_INVALID)
+ {
+ _ASSERTE(fScavengingOccurred);
+ pSegment->rgTail[uType] = BLOCK_INVALID;
+ pSegment->rgHint[uType] = BLOCK_INVALID;
+ }
+ }
}
// store the new free list head
@@ -2549,6 +2567,14 @@ uint32_t BlockFreeHandles(TableSegment *pSegment, uint32_t uBlock, OBJECTHANDLE
if (fAllMasksWeTouchedAreFree)
{
// is the block unlocked?
+ // NOTE: This check is incorrect and defeats the intended purpose of scavenging. If the
+ // current block is locked and has just been emptied, then it cannot be removed right now
+ // and therefore will nominally need to be scavenged. The only code that triggers
+ // scavenging is in SegmentRemoveFreeBlocks, and setting the flag is the only way to
+ // trigger a call into SegmentRemoveFreeBlocks call. As a result, by NOT setting the flag
+ // this code is generally PREVENTING scavenging in exactly the cases where scavenging is
+ // needed. The code is not being changed because it has always been this way and scavenging
+ // itself generally has extremely low value.
if (!BlockIsLocked(pSegment, uBlock))
{
// tell the caller it might be a good idea to scan for free blocks