diff options
author | Jonathan L Long <jonlong@cs.berkeley.edu> | 2015-07-29 20:16:31 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan L Long <jonlong@cs.berkeley.edu> | 2015-07-29 20:16:31 -0700 |
commit | ccc35d361d6c90b7691b3ed8de7ea0678b488dff (patch) | |
tree | 98ff10f8244af575dc5dc72de53d750337e7e724 /CONTRIBUTING.md | |
parent | 7f7085439cbe4eb9d5fff95b41d6345168398142 (diff) | |
download | caffeonacl-ccc35d361d6c90b7691b3ed8de7ea0678b488dff.tar.gz caffeonacl-ccc35d361d6c90b7691b3ed8de7ea0678b488dff.tar.bz2 caffeonacl-ccc35d361d6c90b7691b3ed8de7ea0678b488dff.zip |
[docs] add CONTRIBUTING.md which will appear on GitHub new Issue/PR pages
Diffstat (limited to 'CONTRIBUTING.md')
-rw-r--r-- | CONTRIBUTING.md | 30 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8cd5e56c --- /dev/null +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Contributing + +## Issues + +Specific Caffe design and development issues, bugs, and feature requests are maintained by GitHub Issues. + +_Please do not post usage, installation, or modeling questions, or other requests for help to Issues._ +Use the [caffe-users list](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/caffe-users) instead. This helps developers maintain a clear, uncluttered, and efficient view of the state of Caffe. + +When reporting a bug, it's most helpful to provide the following information, where applicable: + +* What steps reproduce the bug? +* Can you reproduce the bug using the latest [master](https://github.com/BVLC/caffe/tree/master), compiled with the `DEBUG` make option? +* What hardware and operating system/distribution are you running? +* If the bug is a crash, provide the backtrace (usually printed by Caffe; always obtainable with `gdb`). + +Try to give your issue a title that is succinct and specific. The devs will rename issues as needed to keep track of them. + +## Pull Requests + +Caffe welcomes all contributions. + +See the [contributing guide](http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/development.html) for details. + +Briefly: read commit by commit, a PR should tell a clean, compelling story of _one_ improvement to Caffe. In particular: + +* A PR should do one clear thing that obviously improves Caffe, and nothing more. Making many smaller PRs is better than making one large PR; review effort is superlinear in the amount of code involved. +* Similarly, each commit should be a small, atomic change representing one step in development. PRs should be made of many commits where appropriate. +* Please do rewrite PR history to be clean rather than chronological. Within-PR bugfixes, style cleanups, reversions, etc. should be squashed and should not appear in merged PR history. +* Anything nonobvious from the code should be explained in comments, commit messages, or the PR description, as appropriate. |