summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2014-09-24 18:59:42 +0100
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2014-10-02 10:13:56 +0100
commit2278c276a887b12b85ae30d63c446bf45a3bfd9f (patch)
treea8cd4f914bc511e608d2a45813427c7d5af4fad1 /gdb
parentb57bacecd5f3684cd9f58b0da0e2caccbb6a546d (diff)
downloadbinutils-2278c276a887b12b85ae30d63c446bf45a3bfd9f.tar.gz
binutils-2278c276a887b12b85ae30d63c446bf45a3bfd9f.tar.bz2
binutils-2278c276a887b12b85ae30d63c446bf45a3bfd9f.zip
gdb.threads/manythreads.exp: clean up and add comment
In git b57bacec, I said: > With that in place, the need to delay "Program received signal FOO" > was actually caught by the manythreads.exp test. Without that bit, I > was getting: > > [Thread 0x7ffff7f13700 (LWP 4499) exited] > [New Thread 0x7ffff7f0b700 (LWP 4500)] > ^C > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > [New Thread 0x7ffff7f03700 (LWP 4501)] <<< new output > [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7f0b700 (LWP 4500)] > __GI___nptl_death_event () at events.c:31 > 31 { > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/manythreads.exp: stop threads 1 > > That is, I was now getting "New Thread" lines after the "Program > received signal" line, and the test doesn't expect them. As the > number of new threads discovered before and after the "Program > received signal" output is unbounded, it's much nicer to defer > "Program received signal" until after synching the thread list, thus > close to the "switching to thread" output and "current frame/source" > info: > > [Thread 0x7ffff7863700 (LWP 7647) exited] > ^C[New Thread 0x7ffff786b700 (LWP 7648)] > > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7fc4740 (LWP 6243)] > __GI___nptl_create_event () at events.c:25 > 25 { > (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/manythreads.exp: stop threads 1 This commit factors out the two places in the test that are effected by this, and adds there a destilled version of the comment above. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/manythreads.exp (interrupt_and_wait): New procedure. (top level) <stop threads 1, stop threads 2>: Use it.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/manythreads.exp83
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 35796603b15..255e8563e35 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
2014-10-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+ * gdb.threads/manythreads.exp (interrupt_and_wait): New procedure.
+ (top level) <stop threads 1, stop threads 2>: Use it.
+
+2014-10-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+
* gdb.threads/break-while-running.exp (test): Add new
'update_thread_list' argument. Skip "info threads" if false.
(top level): Add new 'update_thread_list' axis.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/manythreads.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/manythreads.exp
index 9431b01cafb..c35d6ab2f31 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/manythreads.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/manythreads.exp
@@ -55,24 +55,58 @@ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "first continue" {
# we don't lose GDB's output while we do it.
remote_expect host 1 { timeout { } }
-# Send a Ctrl-C and verify that we can do info threads and continue
-send_gdb "\003"
-set message "stop threads 1"
-gdb_test_multiple "" "stop threads 1" {
- -re "\\\[New \[^\]\]*\\\]\r\n" {
- exp_continue
- }
- -re "\\\[\[^\]\]* exited\\\]\r\n" {
- exp_continue
- }
- -re "Program received signal SIGINT.*$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass "$message"
- }
- timeout {
- fail "$message (timeout)"
- }
+# Send a Ctrl-C and wait for the SIGINT.
+
+proc interrupt_and_wait { message } {
+ global gdb_prompt
+
+ send_gdb "\003"
+
+ gdb_test_multiple "" $message {
+ -re "\\\[New \[^\]\]*\\\]\r\n" {
+ exp_continue
+ }
+ -re "\\\[\[^\]\]* exited\\\]\r\n" {
+ exp_continue
+ }
+ -re "Program received signal SIGINT.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "$message"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # Note that with this regex order, if GDB emits [New
+ # Thread ...] output between "Program received signal" and
+ # the prompt, the "Program received signal" regex won't
+ # match. That's good, as if we see that happening, it's a
+ # regression.
+ #
+ # GDB makes sure to notify about signal stops, end of
+ # stepping ranges, etc., only after updating the thread
+ # list, otherwise that stop info would be easy to miss.
+ #
+ # A BROKEN example would be:
+ #
+ # ... pages of new threads output ...
+ # [New Thread NNN]
+ # ^C
+ # ... more new threads output ...
+ # [New Thread NNN]
+ # [New Thread NNN]
+ # Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
+ # [New Thread NNN]
+ # [New Thread NNN]
+ # ... pages of new threads output ...
+ # [Switching to Thread NNN]
+ # foo () at foo.c:31
+ # 31 bar ();
+ #
+ fail $test
+ }
+ }
}
+# Send a Ctrl-C and verify that we can do info threads and continue
+interrupt_and_wait "stop threads 1"
+
set cmd "info threads"
set ok 0
gdb_test_multiple $cmd $cmd {
@@ -132,22 +166,7 @@ remote_expect host 1 {
}
# Send another Ctrl-C and verify that we can do info threads and quit
-send_gdb "\003"
-set message "stop threads 2"
-gdb_test_multiple "" "stop threads 2" {
- -re "\\\[New \[^\]\]*\\\]\r\n" {
- exp_continue
- }
- -re "\\\[\[^\]\]* exited\\\]\r\n" {
- exp_continue
- }
- -re "Program received signal SIGINT.*$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass "$message"
- }
- timeout {
- fail "$message (timeout)"
- }
-}
+interrupt_and_wait "stop threads 2"
gdb_test_multiple "quit" "GDB exits after stopping multithreaded program" {
-re "Quit anyway\\? \\(y or n\\) $" {