| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
spi_mem_default_supports_op() rejects DTR ops by default to ensure that
the controller drivers that haven't been updated with DTR support
continue to reject them. It also makes sure that controllers that don't
support DTR mode at all (which is most of them at the moment) also
reject them.
This means that controller drivers that want to support DTR mode can't
use spi_mem_default_supports_op(). Driver authors have to roll their own
supports_op() function and mimic the buswidth checks. Or even worse,
driver authors might skip it completely or get it wrong.
Add spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(). It provides a basic sanity check for DTR
ops and performs the buswidth requirement check. Move the logic for
checking buswidth in spi_mem_default_supports_op() to a separate
function so the logic is not repeated twice.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
Controllers can use this function to perform basic sanity checking on
the spi-mem op.
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
In xSPI mode, flashes expect 2-byte opcodes. The second byte is called
the "command extension". There can be 3 types of extensions in xSPI:
repeat, invert, and hex. When the extension type is "repeat", the same
opcode is sent twice. When it is "invert", the second byte is the
inverse of the opcode. When it is "hex" an additional opcode byte based
is sent with the command whose value can be anything.
So, make opcode a 16-bit value and add a 'nbytes', similar to how
multiple address widths are handled.
All usages of sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) also need to be changed to be
op->cmd.nbytes because that is the actual indicator of opcode size.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
Each phase is given a separate 'dtr' field so mixed protocols like
4S-4D-4D can be supported.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
Update spi_controller_dma_map_mem_op_data() to use -ENOSYS, which is the
correct error code for U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
spi_mem_default_supports_op is used internally by controller
drivers to verify operation semantics are correct.
It is used internally inside spi-mem but has not (in U-Boot)
been declared in spi-mem.h for external use.
Signed-off-by: Mathew McBride <matt@traverse.com.au>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
|
|
This header file should not be included in other header files. Remove it
and use a forward declaration instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Commit: 0ebb261a0b2d ("spi: spi-mem: Add SPI_MEM_NO_DATA to the spi_mem_data_dir enum")
in linux.
When defining spi_mem_op templates we don't necessarily know the size
that will be passed when the template is actually used, and basing the
supports_op() check on op->data.nbytes to know whether there will be
data transferred for a specific operation is not possible.
Add SPI_MEM_NO_DATA to the spi_mem_data_dir enum so that we can base
our checks on op->data.dir instead of op->data.nbytes.
This also fixes a bug identified with the atmel-quaspi driver.
The spi-nor core, when erasing sectors, fills the spi_mem_op template
using SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA, which initializes all the data members with
value zero. This is wrong because data.dir is treated as SPI_MEM_DATA_IN,
which translates in our driver to read accesses for erases (RICR), while
the controller expects write accesses (WICR).
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
Some controllers are exposing high-level interfaces to access various
kind of SPI memories. Unfortunately they do not fit in the current
spi_controller model and usually have drivers placed in
drivers/mtd/spi-nor which are only supporting SPI NORs and not SPI
memories in general.
This is an attempt at defining a SPI memory interface which works for
all kinds of SPI memories (NORs, NANDs, SRAMs).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
|
