| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed
add missing include files directly.
Reviewed-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
At present this uses mtrr_add_request() & mtrr_commit() combination
to program the MTRR for graphics memory. This usage has two major
issues as below:
- mtrr_commit() will re-initialize all MTRR registers from index 0,
using the settings previously added by mtrr_add_request() and saved
in gd->arch.mtrr_req[], which won't cause any issue but is unnecessary
- The way such combination works is based on the assumption that U-Boot
has full control with MTRR programming (e.g.: U-Boot without any blob
that does all low-level initialization on its own, or using FSP2 which
does not touch MTRR), but this is not the case with FSP. FSP programs
some MTRRs during its execution but U-Boot does not have the settings
saved in gd->arch.mtrr_req[] and when doing mtrr_commit() it will
corrupt what was already programmed previously.
Correct this to use mtrr_set_next_var() instead.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rename these to VESA, itself an abbreviation, to avoid a conflict with
Verified Boot for Embedded.
Rename this to avoid referencing VBE.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We want to use VBE to mean Verfiied Boot for Embedded in U-Boot. Rename
the existing VBE (Vesa BIOS extensions) to allow this.
Verified Boot for Embedded is documented doc/develop/vbe.rst
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Try to maintain some consistency between these variables by using _plat as
a suffix for them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).
Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Update the video driver to support this feature and enable it on
minnowmax to speed up the display.
With this change, the time taken to print the environment to the display
without CONFIG_CONSOLE_SCROLL_LINES is reduced from over 13 seconds to
300ms, at 1280x1024.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This adds a DM driver for VESA-compatible device.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
