mm, hwpoison: try to recover from copy-on write faults

commit a873dfe1032a132bf89f9e19a6ac44f5a0b78754 upstream.

Patch series "Copy-on-write poison recovery", v3.

Part 1 deals with the process that triggered the copy on write fault with
a store to a shared read-only page.  That process is send a SIGBUS with
the usual machine check decoration to specify the virtual address of the
lost page, together with the scope.

Part 2 sets up to asynchronously take the page with the uncorrected error
offline to prevent additional machine check faults.  H/t to Miaohe Lin
<linmiaohe@huawei.com> and Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> for
pointing me to the existing function to queue a call to memory_failure().

On x86 there is some duplicate reporting (because the error is also
signalled by the memory controller as well as by the core that triggered
the machine check).  Console logs look like this:


This patch (of 2):

If the kernel is copying a page as the result of a copy-on-write
fault and runs into an uncorrectable error, Linux will crash because
it does not have recovery code for this case where poison is consumed
by the kernel.

It is easy to set up a test case. Just inject an error into a private
page, fork(2), and have the child process write to the page.

I wrapped that neatly into a test at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/ras-tools.git

just enable ACPI error injection and run:

  # ./einj_mem-uc -f copy-on-write

Add a new copy_user_highpage_mc() function that uses copy_mc_to_kernel()
on architectures where that is available (currently x86 and powerpc).
When an error is detected during the page copy, return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON
to caller of wp_page_copy(). This propagates up the call stack. Both x86
and powerpc have code in their fault handler to deal with this code by
sending a SIGBUS to the application.

Note that this patch avoids a system crash and signals the process that
triggered the copy-on-write action. It does not take any action for the
memory error that is still in the shared page. To handle that a call to
memory_failure() is needed. But this cannot be done from wp_page_copy()
because it holds mmap_lock(). Perhaps the architecture fault handlers
can deal with this loose end in a subsequent patch?

On Intel/x86 this loose end will often be handled automatically because
the memory controller provides an additional notification of the h/w
poison in memory, the handler for this will call memory_failure(). This
isn't a 100% solution. If there are multiple errors, not all may be
logged in this way.

[tony.luck@intel.com: add call to kmsan_unpoison_memory(), per Miaohe Lin]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221031201029.102123-2-tony.luck@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021200120.175753-1-tony.luck@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021200120.175753-2-tony.luck@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Igned-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 747b7ea30f89..bd8b04dcc851 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2843,10 +2843,16 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	return same;
 }
 
-static inline bool __wp_page_copy_user(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
-				       struct vm_fault *vmf)
+/*
+ * Return:
+ *	0:		copied succeeded
+ *	-EHWPOISON:	copy failed due to hwpoison in source page
+ *	-EAGAIN:	copied failed (some other reason)
+ */
+static inline int __wp_page_copy_user(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
+				      struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	bool ret;
+	int ret;
 	void *kaddr;
 	void __user *uaddr;
 	bool locked = false;
@@ -2855,8 +2861,9 @@ static inline bool __wp_page_copy_user(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
 	unsigned long addr = vmf->address;
 
 	if (likely(src)) {
-		copy_user_highpage(dst, src, addr, vma);
-		return true;
+		if (copy_mc_user_highpage(dst, src, addr, vma))
+			return -EHWPOISON;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2883,7 +2890,7 @@ static inline bool __wp_page_copy_user(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
 			 * and update local tlb only
 			 */
 			update_mmu_tlb(vma, addr, vmf->pte);
-			ret = false;
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
 			goto pte_unlock;
 		}
 
@@ -2908,7 +2915,7 @@ static inline bool __wp_page_copy_user(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
 		if (!likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
 			/* The PTE changed under us, update local tlb */
 			update_mmu_tlb(vma, addr, vmf->pte);
-			ret = false;
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
 			goto pte_unlock;
 		}
 
@@ -2927,7 +2934,7 @@ warn:
 		}
 	}
 
-	ret = true;
+	ret = 0;
 
 pte_unlock:
 	if (locked)
@@ -3099,6 +3106,7 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte_t entry;
 	int page_copied = 0;
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+	int ret;
 
 	delayacct_wpcopy_start();
 
@@ -3116,19 +3124,21 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		if (!new_page)
 			goto oom;
 
-		if (!__wp_page_copy_user(new_page, old_page, vmf)) {
+		ret = __wp_page_copy_user(new_page, old_page, vmf);
+		if (ret) {
 			/*
 			 * COW failed, if the fault was solved by other,
 			 * it's fine. If not, userspace would re-fault on
 			 * the same address and we will handle the fault
 			 * from the second attempt.
+			 * The -EHWPOISON case will not be retried.
 			 */
 			put_page(new_page);
 			if (old_page)
 				put_page(old_page);
 
 			delayacct_wpcopy_end();
-			return 0;
+			return ret == -EHWPOISON ? VM_FAULT_HWPOISON : 0;
 		}
 		kmsan_copy_page_meta(new_page, old_page);
 	}