summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJunaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>2018-10-31 14:53:57 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2018-12-05 19:32:04 +0100
commit471aca5725299ef1af55c98ff7f5b49b32c3e7ce (patch)
tree6923c9a24d1708d2aa2641d3129320bbd5fdf441 /arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
parent34b7a7cc5321a1b5e13320443557ba1cb11b42e7 (diff)
downloadlinux-rpi3-471aca5725299ef1af55c98ff7f5b49b32c3e7ce.tar.gz
linux-rpi3-471aca5725299ef1af55c98ff7f5b49b32c3e7ce.tar.bz2
linux-rpi3-471aca5725299ef1af55c98ff7f5b49b32c3e7ce.zip
kvm: mmu: Fix race in emulated page table writes
commit 0e0fee5c539b61fdd098332e0e2cc375d9073706 upstream. When a guest page table is updated via an emulated write, kvm_mmu_pte_write() is called to update the shadow PTE using the just written guest PTE value. But if two emulated guest PTE writes happened concurrently, it is possible that the guest PTE and the shadow PTE end up being out of sync. Emulated writes do not mark the shadow page as unsync-ed, so this inconsistency will not be resolved even by a guest TLB flush (unless the page was marked as unsync-ed at some other point). This is fixed by re-reading the current value of the guest PTE after the MMU lock has been acquired instead of just using the value that was written prior to calling kvm_mmu_pte_write(). Signed-off-by: Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c27
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 51b953ad9d4e..1b82bc7c3cca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -5013,9 +5013,9 @@ static bool need_remote_flush(u64 old, u64 new)
}
static u64 mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t *gpa,
- const u8 *new, int *bytes)
+ int *bytes)
{
- u64 gentry;
+ u64 gentry = 0;
int r;
/*
@@ -5027,22 +5027,12 @@ static u64 mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t *gpa,
/* Handle a 32-bit guest writing two halves of a 64-bit gpte */
*gpa &= ~(gpa_t)7;
*bytes = 8;
- r = kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, *gpa, &gentry, 8);
- if (r)
- gentry = 0;
- new = (const u8 *)&gentry;
}
- switch (*bytes) {
- case 4:
- gentry = *(const u32 *)new;
- break;
- case 8:
- gentry = *(const u64 *)new;
- break;
- default:
- gentry = 0;
- break;
+ if (*bytes == 4 || *bytes == 8) {
+ r = kvm_vcpu_read_guest_atomic(vcpu, *gpa, &gentry, *bytes);
+ if (r)
+ gentry = 0;
}
return gentry;
@@ -5146,8 +5136,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
pgprintk("%s: gpa %llx bytes %d\n", __func__, gpa, bytes);
- gentry = mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(vcpu, &gpa, new, &bytes);
-
/*
* No need to care whether allocation memory is successful
* or not since pte prefetch is skiped if it does not have
@@ -5156,6 +5144,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu);
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ gentry = mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(vcpu, &gpa, &bytes);
+
++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pte_write;
kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, AUDIT_PRE_PTE_WRITE);