summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArun Ajith S <aajith@arista.com>2022-05-30 10:14:14 +0000
committerPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2022-05-31 11:36:57 +0200
commit3e0b8f529c10037ae0b369fc892e524eae5a5485 (patch)
tree41f7fe4b731d75b6c9ff0b73afd8b7affa56b562 /net
parent4a1f14df55d1e9ecdfa797a87a80131207cbd66f (diff)
downloadlinux-rpi-3e0b8f529c10037ae0b369fc892e524eae5a5485.tar.gz
linux-rpi-3e0b8f529c10037ae0b369fc892e524eae5a5485.tar.bz2
linux-rpi-3e0b8f529c10037ae0b369fc892e524eae5a5485.zip
net/ipv6: Expand and rename accept_unsolicited_na to accept_untracked_na
RFC 9131 changes default behaviour of handling RX of NA messages when the corresponding entry is absent in the neighbour cache. The current implementation is limited to accept just unsolicited NAs. However, the RFC is more generic where it also accepts solicited NAs. Both types should result in adding a STALE entry for this case. Expand accept_untracked_na behaviour to also accept solicited NAs to be compliant with the RFC and rename the sysctl knob to accept_untracked_na. Fixes: f9a2fb73318e ("net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131") Signed-off-by: Arun Ajith S <aajith@arista.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220530101414.65439-1-aajith@arista.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv6/addrconf.c6
-rw-r--r--net/ipv6/ndisc.c42
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index ca0aa744593e..1b1932502e9e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -5586,7 +5586,7 @@ static inline void ipv6_store_devconf(struct ipv6_devconf *cnf,
array[DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID] = cnf->ioam6_id;
array[DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID_WIDE] = cnf->ioam6_id_wide;
array[DEVCONF_NDISC_EVICT_NOCARRIER] = cnf->ndisc_evict_nocarrier;
- array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNSOLICITED_NA] = cnf->accept_unsolicited_na;
+ array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNTRACKED_NA] = cnf->accept_untracked_na;
}
static inline size_t inet6_ifla6_size(void)
@@ -7038,8 +7038,8 @@ static const struct ctl_table addrconf_sysctl[] = {
.extra2 = (void *)SYSCTL_ONE,
},
{
- .procname = "accept_unsolicited_na",
- .data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_unsolicited_na,
+ .procname = "accept_untracked_na",
+ .data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_untracked_na,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
index 254addad0dd3..b0dfe97ea4ee 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct inet6_dev *idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
struct neighbour *neigh;
- bool create_neigh;
+ u8 new_state;
if (skb->len < sizeof(struct nd_msg)) {
ND_PRINTK(2, warn, "NA: packet too short\n");
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb)
/* For some 802.11 wireless deployments (and possibly other networks),
* there will be a NA proxy and unsolicitd packets are attacks
* and thus should not be accepted.
- * drop_unsolicited_na takes precedence over accept_unsolicited_na
+ * drop_unsolicited_na takes precedence over accept_untracked_na
*/
if (!msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited && idev &&
idev->cnf.drop_unsolicited_na)
@@ -1041,25 +1041,33 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb)
in6_ifa_put(ifp);
return;
}
+
+ neigh = neigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev);
+
/* RFC 9131 updates original Neighbour Discovery RFC 4861.
- * An unsolicited NA can now create a neighbour cache entry
- * on routers if it has Target LL Address option.
+ * NAs with Target LL Address option without a corresponding
+ * entry in the neighbour cache can now create a STALE neighbour
+ * cache entry on routers.
+ *
+ * entry accept fwding solicited behaviour
+ * ------- ------ ------ --------- ----------------------
+ * present X X 0 Set state to STALE
+ * present X X 1 Set state to REACHABLE
+ * absent 0 X X Do nothing
+ * absent 1 0 X Do nothing
+ * absent 1 1 X Add a new STALE entry
*
- * drop accept fwding behaviour
- * ---- ------ ------ ----------------------------------------------
- * 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack
- * 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC
- * 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC
- * 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE
- * NC entry
* Note that we don't do a (daddr == all-routers-mcast) check.
*/
- create_neigh = !msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited && lladdr &&
- idev && idev->cnf.forwarding &&
- idev->cnf.accept_unsolicited_na;
- neigh = __neigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev, create_neigh);
+ new_state = msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited ? NUD_REACHABLE : NUD_STALE;
+ if (!neigh && lladdr &&
+ idev && idev->cnf.forwarding &&
+ idev->cnf.accept_untracked_na) {
+ neigh = neigh_create(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev);
+ new_state = NUD_STALE;
+ }
- if (neigh) {
+ if (neigh && !IS_ERR(neigh)) {
u8 old_flags = neigh->flags;
struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
@@ -1079,7 +1087,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
ndisc_update(dev, neigh, lladdr,
- msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited ? NUD_REACHABLE : NUD_STALE,
+ new_state,
NEIGH_UPDATE_F_WEAK_OVERRIDE|
(msg->icmph.icmp6_override ? NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE : 0)|
NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE_ISROUTER|