diff options
| author | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2021-08-24 09:06:07 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2021-08-24 12:08:28 -0700 |
| commit | a6e6d722957273afebf26b9a36b90acfc27dca8a (patch) | |
| tree | 34219544b8072c68ee406b322c7f2cc0e19001f4 /drivers/nvdimm/label.c | |
| parent | 8b03aa0e0e5aea61d5a7fc6434faba2a05a6095b (diff) | |
| download | linux-rpi-a6e6d722957273afebf26b9a36b90acfc27dca8a.tar.gz linux-rpi-a6e6d722957273afebf26b9a36b90acfc27dca8a.tar.bz2 linux-rpi-a6e6d722957273afebf26b9a36b90acfc27dca8a.zip | |
libnvdimm/labels: Add claim class helpers
In preparation for LIBNVDIMM to manage labels on CXL devices deploy
helpers that abstract the label type from the implementation. The CXL
label format is mostly similar to the EFI label format with concepts /
fields added, like dynamic region creation and label type guids, and
other concepts removed like BLK-mode and interleave-set-cookie ids.
CXL labels do have the concept of a claim class represented by an
"abstraction" identifier. It turns out both label implementations use
the same ids, but EFI encodes them as GUIDs and CXL labels encode them
as UUIDs. For now abstract out the claim class such that the UUID vs
GUID distinction can later be hidden in the helper.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162982116719.1124374.9917866609080940364.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/nvdimm/label.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c index 294ffc3cb582..7f473f9db300 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static unsigned long nd_label_offset(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, - (unsigned long) to_namespace_index(ndd, 0); } -enum nvdimm_claim_class to_nvdimm_cclass(guid_t *guid) +static enum nvdimm_claim_class to_nvdimm_cclass(guid_t *guid) { if (guid_equal(guid, &nvdimm_btt_guid)) return NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT; @@ -792,6 +792,25 @@ bool nsl_validate_type_guid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, return true; } +static void nsl_set_claim_class(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label, + enum nvdimm_claim_class claim_class) +{ + if (!namespace_label_has(ndd, abstraction_guid)) + return; + guid_copy(&nd_label->abstraction_guid, + to_abstraction_guid(claim_class, + &nd_label->abstraction_guid)); +} + +enum nvdimm_claim_class nsl_get_claim_class(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label) +{ + if (!namespace_label_has(ndd, abstraction_guid)) + return NVDIMM_CCLASS_NONE; + return to_nvdimm_cclass(&nd_label->abstraction_guid); +} + static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm, int pos, unsigned long flags) @@ -843,10 +862,7 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, nsl_set_dpa(ndd, nd_label, res->start); nsl_set_slot(ndd, nd_label, slot); nsl_set_type_guid(ndd, nd_label, &nd_set->type_guid); - if (namespace_label_has(ndd, abstraction_guid)) - guid_copy(&nd_label->abstraction_guid, - to_abstraction_guid(ndns->claim_class, - &nd_label->abstraction_guid)); + nsl_set_claim_class(ndd, nd_label, ndns->claim_class); nsl_calculate_checksum(ndd, nd_label); nd_dbg_dpa(nd_region, ndd, res, "\n"); @@ -1111,10 +1127,7 @@ static int __blk_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, nsl_set_lbasize(ndd, nd_label, nsblk->lbasize); nsl_set_slot(ndd, nd_label, slot); nsl_set_type_guid(ndd, nd_label, &nd_set->type_guid); - if (namespace_label_has(ndd, abstraction_guid)) - guid_copy(&nd_label->abstraction_guid, - to_abstraction_guid(ndns->claim_class, - &nd_label->abstraction_guid)); + nsl_set_claim_class(ndd, nd_label, ndns->claim_class); nsl_calculate_checksum(ndd, nd_label); /* update label */ |