From 24e93025ee434a58d35e5abb283c5bcc9a13e477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:58:56 -0500 Subject: nfs: clean up sillyrenaming in nfs_rename() The d_instantiate(new_dentry, NULL) is superfluous, the dentry is already negative. Rehashing this dummy dentry isn't needed either, d_move() works fine on an unhashed target. The re-checking for busy after a failed nfs_sillyrename() is bogus too: new_dentry->d_count < 2 would be a bug here. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/dir.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c index 76b7f539d76e..2c5ace4f00a7 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c @@ -1611,14 +1611,11 @@ static int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, /* silly-rename the existing target ... */ err = nfs_sillyrename(new_dir, new_dentry); - if (!err) { - new_dentry = rehash = dentry; - new_inode = NULL; - /* instantiate the replacement target */ - d_instantiate(new_dentry, NULL); - } else if (atomic_read(&new_dentry->d_count) > 1) - /* dentry still busy? */ + if (err) goto out; + + new_dentry = dentry; + new_inode = NULL; } } -- cgit v1.2.3