summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>2018-10-04 13:37:32 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2018-10-18 09:16:19 +0200
commit7976e6b70ecf1c9d592d597a7e9292aa8ad9e3fc (patch)
tree2af143fefcd657936915051750c6b358a0713012 /net/ipv4
parent49984ca4e60ef5a707fd73b9e4bf34c539bbe2bf (diff)
downloadlinux-exynos-7976e6b70ecf1c9d592d597a7e9292aa8ad9e3fc.tar.gz
linux-exynos-7976e6b70ecf1c9d592d597a7e9292aa8ad9e3fc.tar.bz2
linux-exynos-7976e6b70ecf1c9d592d597a7e9292aa8ad9e3fc.zip
udp: Unbreak modules that rely on external __skb_recv_udp() availability
[ Upstream commit 7e823644b60555f70f241274b8d0120dd919269a ] Commit 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception") turned static inline __skb_recv_udp() from being a trivial helper around __skb_recv_datagram() into a UDP specific implementaion, making it EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() at the same time. There are external modules that got broken by __skb_recv_udp() not being visible to them. Let's unbreak them by making __skb_recv_udp EXPORT_SYMBOL(). Rationale (one of those) why this is actually "technically correct" thing to do: __skb_recv_udp() used to be an inline wrapper around __skb_recv_datagram(), which itself (still, and correctly so, I believe) is EXPORT_SYMBOL(). Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Fixes: 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception") Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/udp.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 3de413867991..dc0ec227b9d2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1565,7 +1565,7 @@ busy_check:
*err = error;
return NULL;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__skb_recv_udp);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_recv_udp);
/*
* This should be easy, if there is something there we