diff options
author | Alexander Polakov <apolyakov@beget.ru> | 2016-10-27 17:46:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> | 2016-11-23 20:59:49 -0500 |
commit | 55a2f87cd5642a68b19c4bea8fdce8bf2a84228e (patch) | |
tree | f97b5d158f2dfcd3d4b2bd129f9d30189458f2ad | |
parent | 52e7b6bd8378b1b194ad35a27a185dffa6fb4066 (diff) | |
download | linux-exynos-55a2f87cd5642a68b19c4bea8fdce8bf2a84228e.tar.gz linux-exynos-55a2f87cd5642a68b19c4bea8fdce8bf2a84228e.tar.bz2 linux-exynos-55a2f87cd5642a68b19c4bea8fdce8bf2a84228e.zip |
mm/list_lru.c: avoid error-path NULL pointer deref
[ Upstream commit 1bc11d70b5db7c6bb1414b283d7f09b1fe1ac0d0 ]
As described in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177821:
After some analysis it seems to be that the problem is in alloc_super().
In case list_lru_init_memcg() fails it goes into destroy_super(), which
calls list_lru_destroy().
And in list_lru_init() we see that in case memcg_init_list_lru() fails,
lru->node is freed, but not set NULL, which then leads list_lru_destroy()
to believe it is initialized and call memcg_destroy_list_lru().
memcg_destroy_list_lru() in turn can access lru->node[i].memcg_lrus,
which is NULL.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add comment]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Polakov <apolyakov@beget.ru>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
-rw-r--r-- | mm/list_lru.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index 909eca2c820e..84b4c21d78d7 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware, err = memcg_init_list_lru(lru, memcg_aware); if (err) { kfree(lru->node); + /* Do this so a list_lru_destroy() doesn't crash: */ + lru->node = NULL; goto out; } |