blob: 0e90b0c6524941c9ac1363b0f6ef86bb68d97b02 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
From ca4a851ade5923ec4234dcfeb20e0ed0ec4b63e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:18 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 0453/1302] f2fs: fix por_doing variable coverage
The reason of using sbi->por_doing is to alleviate data writes during the
recovery.
The find_fsync_dnodes() produces some dirty dentry pages, so we should
cover it too with sbi->por_doing.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 2941987..4d89514 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode_list);
/* step #1: find fsynced inode numbers */
+ sbi->por_doing = 1;
err = find_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -389,13 +390,12 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
goto out;
/* step #2: recover data */
- sbi->por_doing = 1;
err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
- sbi->por_doing = 0;
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode_list));
out:
destroy_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
kmem_cache_destroy(fsync_entry_slab);
+ sbi->por_doing = 0;
write_checkpoint(sbi, false);
return err;
}
--
1.8.3.2
|
