From af49d9248fca6f26cbdb01918334f71d9040df80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:26:27 -0700
Subject: Remove "unsafe" from module struct

Adrian Bunk points out that "unsafe" was used to mark modules touched by
the deprecated MOD_INC_USE_COUNT interface, which has long gone.  It's time
to remove the member from the module structure, as well.

If you want a module which can't unload, don't register an exit function.

(Vlad Yasevich says SCTP is now safe to unload, so just remove the
__unsafe there).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 net/sctp/protocol.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'net')

diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index 81b26c5ffd4..f5cd96f5fe7 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -1228,7 +1228,6 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
 	if (status)
 		goto err_v6_add_protocol;
 
-	__unsafe(THIS_MODULE);
 	status = 0;
 out:
 	return status;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3