From eccdaeafaea3ed115068ba55d01f22e486e5437d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Tesarik Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:31 +0100 Subject: posix-cpu-timers: fix clock_gettime with CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID Since CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is in fact translated to -6, the switch statement in cpu_clock_sample_group() must first mask off the irrelevant bits, similar to cpu_clock_sample(). Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner -- posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c index 895337b16a2..4e5288a831d 100644 --- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c +++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int cpu_clock_sample_group(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_cputime cputime; thread_group_cputime(p, &cputime); - switch (which_clock) { + switch (CPUCLOCK_WHICH(which_clock)) { default: return -EINVAL; case CPUCLOCK_PROF: -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6c9bacb41c10ba84ff68f238e234d96f35fb64f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: john stultz Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:34:41 -0800 Subject: time: catch xtime_nsec underflows and fix them Impact: fix time warp bug Alex Shi, along with Yanmin Zhang have been noticing occasional time inconsistencies recently. Through their great diagnosis, they found that the xtime_nsec value used in update_wall_time was occasionally going negative. After looking through the code for awhile, I realized we have the possibility for an underflow when three conditions are met in update_wall_time(): 1) We have accumulated a second's worth of nanoseconds, so we incremented xtime.tv_sec and appropriately decrement xtime_nsec. (This doesn't cause xtime_nsec to go negative, but it can cause it to be small). 2) The remaining offset value is large, but just slightly less then cycle_interval. 3) clocksource_adjust() is speeding up the clock, causing a corrective amount (compensating for the increase in the multiplier being multiplied against the unaccumulated offset value) to be subtracted from xtime_nsec. This can cause xtime_nsec to underflow. Unfortunately, since we notify the NTP subsystem via second_overflow() whenever we accumulate a full second, and this effects the error accumulation that has already occured, we cannot simply revert the accumulated second from xtime nor move the second accumulation to after the clocksource_adjust call without a change in behavior. This leaves us with (at least) two options: 1) Simply return from clocksource_adjust() without making a change if we notice the adjustment would cause xtime_nsec to go negative. This would work, but I'm concerned that if a large adjustment was needed (due to the error being large), it may be possible to get stuck with an ever increasing error that becomes too large to correct (since it may always force xtime_nsec negative). This may just be paranoia on my part. 2) Catch xtime_nsec if it is negative, then add back the amount its negative to both xtime_nsec and the error. This second method is consistent with how we've handled earlier rounding issues, and also has the benefit that the error being added is always in the oposite direction also always equal or smaller then the correction being applied. So the risk of a corner case where things get out of control is lessened. This patch fixes bug 11970, as tested by Yanmin Zhang http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11970 Reported-by: alex.shi@intel.com Signed-off-by: John Stultz Acked-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" Tested-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index e7acfb482a6..fa05e88aa76 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -518,6 +518,28 @@ void update_wall_time(void) /* correct the clock when NTP error is too big */ clocksource_adjust(offset); + /* + * Since in the loop above, we accumulate any amount of time + * in xtime_nsec over a second into xtime.tv_sec, its possible for + * xtime_nsec to be fairly small after the loop. Further, if we're + * slightly speeding the clocksource up in clocksource_adjust(), + * its possible the required corrective factor to xtime_nsec could + * cause it to underflow. + * + * Now, we cannot simply roll the accumulated second back, since + * the NTP subsystem has been notified via second_overflow. So + * instead we push xtime_nsec forward by the amount we underflowed, + * and add that amount into the error. + * + * We'll correct this error next time through this function, when + * xtime_nsec is not as small. + */ + if (unlikely((s64)clock->xtime_nsec < 0)) { + s64 neg = -(s64)clock->xtime_nsec; + clock->xtime_nsec = 0; + clock->error += neg << (NTP_SCALE_SHIFT - clock->shift); + } + /* store full nanoseconds into xtime after rounding it up and * add the remainder to the error difference. */ -- cgit v1.2.3