summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-02-22new helper: file_inode(file)Al Viro1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-20move private bits of reiserfs_fs.h to fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.hAl Viro1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-01-03vfs: mnt_drop_write_file()Al Viro1-2/+2
new helper (wrapper around mnt_drop_write()) to be used in pair with mnt_want_write_file(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-01-03switch a bunch of places to mnt_want_write_file()Al Viro1-2/+2
it's both faster (in case when file has been opened for write) and cleaner. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-03-23userns: rename is_owner_or_cap to inode_owner_or_capableSerge E. Hallyn1-2/+2
And give it a kernel-doc comment. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: btrfs changed in linux-next] Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-11-25reiserfs: fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misorderingFrederic Weisbecker1-4/+3
reiserfs_unpack() locks the inode mutex with reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() to protect against reiserfs lock dependency. However this protection requires to have the reiserfs lock to be locked. This is the case if reiserfs_unpack() is called by reiserfs_ioctl but not from reiserfs_quota_on() when it tries to unpack tails of quota files. Fix the ordering of the two locks in reiserfs_unpack() to fix this issue. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reported-by: Markus Gapp <markus.gapp@gmx.net> Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.36.x] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-11-17BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp_lock.h>Arnd Bergmann1-1/+0
The big kernel lock has been removed from all these files at some point, leaving only the #include. Remove this too as a cleanup. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-25fs: kill block_prepare_writeChristoph Hellwig1-4/+2
__block_write_begin and block_prepare_write are identical except for slightly different calling conventions. Convert all callers to the __block_write_begin calling conventions and drop block_prepare_write. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-10-01reiserfs: fix unwanted reiserfs lock recursionFrederic Weisbecker1-2/+3
Prevent from recursively locking the reiserfs lock in reiserfs_unpack() because we may call journal_begin() that requires the lock to be taken only once, otherwise it won't be able to release the lock while taking other mutexes, ending up in inverted dependencies between the journal mutex and the reiserfs lock for example. This fixes: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.35.4.4a #3 ------------------------------------------------------- lilo/1620 is trying to acquire lock: (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs] but task is already holding lock: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] [<d0325c06>] do_journal_begin_r+0x86/0x340 [reiserfs] [<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs] [<d0315be4>] reiserfs_remount+0x224/0x530 [reiserfs] [<c10b6a20>] do_remount_sb+0x60/0x110 [<c10cee25>] do_mount+0x625/0x790 [<c10cf014>] sys_mount+0x84/0xb0 [<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}: [<c10560f6>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180 [<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs] [<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs] [<d0326271>] reiserfs_persistent_transaction+0x41/0x90 [reiserfs] [<d030d06c>] reiserfs_get_block+0x22c/0x1530 [reiserfs] [<c10db9db>] __block_prepare_write+0x1bb/0x3a0 [<c10dbbe6>] block_prepare_write+0x26/0x40 [<d030b738>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x88/0x170 [reiserfs] [<d03294d6>] reiserfs_unpack+0xe6/0x120 [reiserfs] [<d0329782>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs] [<c10c3188>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0 [<c10c3bbd>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0 [<c10c3eb3>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70 [<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by lilo/1620: #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032945a>] reiserfs_unpack+0x6a/0x120 [reiserfs] #1: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] stack backtrace: Pid: 1620, comm: lilo Not tainted 2.6.35.4.4a #3 Call Trace: [<c10560f6>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180 [<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs] [<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs] [<d0326271>] reiserfs_persistent_transaction+0x41/0x90 [reiserfs] [<d030d06c>] reiserfs_get_block+0x22c/0x1530 [reiserfs] [<c10db9db>] __block_prepare_write+0x1bb/0x3a0 [<c10dbbe6>] block_prepare_write+0x26/0x40 [<d030b738>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x88/0x170 [reiserfs] [<d03294d6>] reiserfs_unpack+0xe6/0x120 [reiserfs] [<d0329782>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs] [<c10c3188>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0 [<c10c3bbd>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0 [<c10c3eb3>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70 [<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Reported-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: All since 2.6.32 <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-01reiserfs: fix dependency inversion between inode and reiserfs mutexesFrederic Weisbecker1-1/+1
The reiserfs mutex already depends on the inode mutex, so we can't lock the inode mutex in reiserfs_unpack() without using the safe locking API, because reiserfs_unpack() is always called with the reiserfs mutex locked. This fixes: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.35c #13 ------------------------------------------------------- lilo/1606 is trying to acquire lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs] but task is already holding lock: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] [<d0329e9a>] reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x2a/0x90 [reiserfs] [<d0316b81>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x941/0xe60 [reiserfs] [<c10b7d17>] get_sb_bdev+0x117/0x170 [<d0313e21>] get_super_block+0x21/0x30 [reiserfs] [<c10b74ba>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6a/0x1b0 [<c10b7659>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xe0 [<c10cebe0>] do_mount+0x340/0x790 [<c10cf0b4>] sys_mount+0x84/0xb0 [<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}: [<c1056186>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180 [<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs] [<d0329772>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs] [<c10c3228>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0 [<c10c3c5d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0 [<c10c3f53>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70 [<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by lilo/1606: #0: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs] stack backtrace: Pid: 1606, comm: lilo Not tainted 2.6.35c #13 Call Trace: [<c1056186>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180 [<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80 [<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410 [<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20 [<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs] [<d0329772>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs] [<c10c3228>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0 [<c10c3c5d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0 [<c10c3f53>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70 [<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Reported-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.32 and later] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-01-07reiserfs: Fix unreachable statementJiri Slaby1-1/+2
Stanse found an unreachable statement in reiserfs_ioctl. There is a if followed by error assignment and `break' with no braces. Add the braces so that we don't break every time, but only in error case, so that REISERFS_IOC_SETVERSION actually works when it returns no error. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Reiserfs <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2009-10-14kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: definitely drop the bkl from reiserfs_ioctl()Frederic Weisbecker1-8/+3
The reiserfs ioctl path doesn't need the big kernel lock anymore , now that the filesystem synchronizes through its own lock. We can then turn reiserfs_ioctl() into an unlocked_ioctl callback. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Cc: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2009-10-14kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: always lock the ioctl pathFrederic Weisbecker1-27/+39
Reiserfs uses the ioctl callback for its file operations, which means that its ioctl path is still locked by the bkl, this was synchronizing with the rest of the filsystem operations. We have changed that by locking it with the new reiserfs lock but we do that only from the compat_ioctl callback. Fix that by locking reiserfs_ioctl() everytime. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Cc: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2009-09-14reiserfs: kill-the-BKLFrederic Weisbecker1-2/+4
This patch is an attempt to remove the Bkl based locking scheme from reiserfs and is intended. It is a bit inspired from an old attempt by Peter Zijlstra: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0704.2/2174.html The bkl is heavily used in this filesystem to prevent from concurrent write accesses on the filesystem. Reiserfs makes a deep use of the specific properties of the Bkl: - It can be acqquired recursively by a same task - It is released on the schedule() calls and reacquired when schedule() returns The two properties above are a roadmap for the reiserfs write locking so it's very hard to simply replace it with a common mutex. - We need a recursive-able locking unless we want to restructure several blocks of the code. - We need to identify the sites where the bkl was implictly relaxed (schedule, wait, sync, etc...) so that we can in turn release and reacquire our new lock explicitly. Such implicit releases of the lock are often required to let other resources producer/consumer do their job or we can suffer unexpected starvations or deadlocks. So the new lock that replaces the bkl here is a per superblock mutex with a specific property: it can be acquired recursively by a same task, like the bkl. For such purpose, we integrate a lock owner and a lock depth field on the superblock information structure. The first axis on this patch is to turn reiserfs_write_(un)lock() function into a wrapper to manage this mutex. Also some explicit calls to lock_kernel() have been converted to reiserfs_write_lock() helpers. The second axis is to find the important blocking sites (schedule...(), wait_on_buffer(), sync_dirty_buffer(), etc...) and then apply an explicit release of the write lock on these locations before blocking. Then we can safely wait for those who can give us resources or those who need some. Typically this is a fight between the current writer, the reiserfs workqueue (aka the async commiter) and the pdflush threads. The third axis is a consequence of the second. The write lock is usually on top of a lock dependency chain which can include the journal lock, the flush lock or the commit lock. So it's dangerous to release and trying to reacquire the write lock while we still hold other locks. This is fine with the bkl: T1 T2 lock_kernel() mutex_lock(A) unlock_kernel() // do something lock_kernel() mutex_lock(A) -> already locked by T1 schedule() (and then unlock_kernel()) lock_kernel() mutex_unlock(A) .... This is not fine with a mutex: T1 T2 mutex_lock(write) mutex_lock(A) mutex_unlock(write) // do something mutex_lock(write) mutex_lock(A) -> already locked by T1 schedule() mutex_lock(write) -> already locked by T2 deadlock The solution in this patch is to provide a helper which releases the write lock and sleep a bit if we can't lock a mutex that depend on it. It's another simulation of the bkl behaviour. The last axis is to locate the fs callbacks that are called with the bkl held, according to Documentation/filesystem/Locking. Those are: - reiserfs_remount - reiserfs_fill_super - reiserfs_put_super Reiserfs didn't need to explicitly lock because of the context of these callbacks. But now we must take care of that with the new locking. After this patch, reiserfs suffers from a slight performance regression (for now). On UP, a high volume write with dd reports an average of 27 MB/s instead of 30 MB/s without the patch applied. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> LKML-Reference: <1239070789-13354-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-03-30reiserfs: strip trailing whitespaceJeff Mahoney1-1/+1
This patch strips trailing whitespace from the reiserfs code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28reiserfs: unpack tails on quota filesJan Kara1-3/+1
Quota files cannot have tails because quota_write and quota_read functions do not support them. So far when quota files did have tail, we just refused to turn quotas on it. Sadly this check has been wrong and so there are now plenty installations where quota files don't have NOTAIL flag set and so now after fixing the check, they suddently fail to turn quotas on. Since it's easy to unpack the tail from kernel, do this from reiserfs_quota_on() which solves the problem and is generally nicer to users anyway. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: <urhausen@urifabi.net> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-19[PATCH] r/o bind mounts: elevate write count for ioctls()Dave Hansen1-22/+41
Some ioctl()s can cause writes to the filesystem. Take these, and make them use mnt_want/drop_write() instead. [AV: updated] Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2007-11-14Forbid user to change file flags on quota filesJan Kara1-0/+3
Forbid user from changing file flags on quota files. User has no bussiness in playing with these flags when quota is on. Furthermore there is a remote possibility of deadlock due to a lock inversion between quota file's i_mutex and transaction's start (i_mutex for quota file is locked only when trasaction is started in quota operations) in ext3 and ext4. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: LIOU Payphone <lioupayphone@gmail.com> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com> Cc: <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16reiserfs: convert to new aopsVladimir Saveliev1-4/+6
Convert reiserfs to new aops Signed-off-by: Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-17Introduce is_owner_or_cap() to wrap CAP_FOWNER use with fsuid checkSatyam Sharma1-3/+2
Introduce is_owner_or_cap() macro in fs.h, and convert over relevant users to it. This is done because we want to avoid bugs in the future where we check for only effective fsuid of the current task against a file's owning uid, without simultaneously checking for CAP_FOWNER as well, thus violating its semantics. [ XFS uses special macros and structures, and in general looked ... untouchable, so we leave it alone -- but it has been looked over. ] The (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) check in generic_permission() and exec_permission_lite() is left alone, because those operations are covered by CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE and CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH. Similarly operations falling under the purview of CAP_CHOWN and CAP_LEASE are also left alone. Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2006-12-08[PATCH] struct path: convert reiserfsJosef Sipek1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-30[PATCH] BLOCK: Move the ReiserFS device ioctl compat stuff to the ReiserFS ↵David Howells1-0/+35
driver [try #6] Move the ReiserFS device ioctl compat stuff from fs/compat_ioctl.c to the ReiserFS driver so that the ReiserFS header file doesn't need to be included. Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2006-08-06[PATCH] fix reiserfs lock inversion of bkl vs inode semaphoreChris Mason1-1/+1
The correct lock ordering is inode lock -> BKL Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-11[PATCH] capable/capability.h (fs/)Randy Dunlap1-0/+1
fs: Use <linux/capability.h> where capable() is used. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Acked-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-09[PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to mutex: VFS, ->i_semJes Sorensen1-2/+2
This patch converts the inode semaphore to a mutex. I have tested it on XFS and compiled as much as one can consider on an ia64. Anyway your luck with it might be different. Modified-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> (finished the conversion) Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2005-07-12reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs codeLinus Torvalds1-96/+101
This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-29[PATCH] reiserfs: Check if attrs are enabled for attr ioctlsJeff Mahoney1-0/+6
ReiserFS currently will allow the user to set/get attrs for files regardless if they are enabled. The patch checks to see if they are enabled, and returns -NOTTY if they are not. ext[23] doesn't need this check because attrs are always enabled. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds1-0/+151
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!