| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Like with commit 3c739ad0df5eb41cd7adad879eda6aa09879eb76
it is not always enough to specify all the pins of a gpio_chip
from offset zero to be added to a pin map range, since the
mapping from GPIO to pin controller may not be linear at all,
but need to be broken into a few consecutive sub-ranges or
1-pin entries for complicated cases. The ranges may also be
sparse.
This alters the signature of the function to accept offsets
into both the GPIO-chip local pinspace and the pin controller
local pinspace.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.
So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.
This is done by:
- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
reliably check whether this succeeds.
- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
purpose-specific.
- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
gpiochip_add_pin_range().
Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"
Introduced both of_gpiochip_remove_pin_range() and
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(). But the contents are exactly
the same so remove the OF one and rely on the range deletion
in the core.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"
Declared the of_gpiochip_[add|remove]_pin_range() global
while they should be static as they are only ever used in
this file. Let's convert them to static.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.
As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.
After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
This was probably missed in the conversion done in commit 3d0f7cf
("gpio: Adjust of_xlate API to support multiple GPIO chips").
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
of_get_named_gpio_flags() and of_get_named_gpio() return -EPROBE_DEFER if the
respective GPIO is not (yet) available. This is useful if driver's probe()
functions try to get a GPIO whose controller isn't probed yet. Thus, the driver
can be probed again later on.
The function still returns -EINVAL on other errors (parse error or node doesn't
exist). This way, the case of an optional/intentionally missing GPIO is handled
appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Make of_get_named_gpio_flags propagate any error it receives from
of_parse_phandle_with_args instead of inconditionally returning -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
|
|
This patch changes the of_xlate API to make it possible for multiple
gpio_chips to refer to the same device tree node. This is useful for
banked GPIO controllers that use multiple gpio_chips for a single
device. With this change the core code will try calling of_xlate on
each gpio_chip that references the device_node and will return the
gpio number for the first one to return 'true'.
Tested-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
|
|
Linux 3.4-rc6
|
|
The code in drivers/of/gpio.c isn't shared by any other subsystem since it
is all gpiolib specific. drivers/gpio is a better place to maintain these
functions.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
|
