summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-01-09ACPICA: create acpica/ directoryLen Brown1-696/+0
also, delete sleep/ and delete ACPI_CFLAGS from Makefile Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-12-31ACPI: main.c: use new public GPE group enable/disable interfacesLin Ming1-6/+6
Avoid using internal functions: acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes and acpi_hw_enable_all_runtime_gpes Use new public GPE group enable/disable interfaces: acpi_disable_all_gpes and acpi_enable_all_runtime_gpes Also avoid using internal symbol ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS, call acpi_get_table. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-11-26ACPI suspend: Blacklist boxes that require us to set SCI_EN directly on resumeRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+39
Some Apple boxes evidently require us to set SCI_EN on resume directly, because if we don't do that, they hung somewhere in the resume code path. Moreover, on these boxes it is not sufficient to use acpi_enable() to turn ACPI on during resume. All of this is against the ACPI specification which states that (1) the BIOS is supposed to return from the S3 sleep state with ACPI enabled (SCI_EN set) and (2) the SCI_EN bit is owned by the hardware and we are not supposed to change it. For this reason, blacklist the affected systems so that the SCI_EN bit is set during resume on them. [NOTE: Unconditional setting SCI_EN for all system on resume doesn't work, because it makes some other systems crash (that's to be expected). Also, it is not entirely clear right now if all of the Apple boxes require this workaround.] This patch fixes the recent regression tracked as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12038 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de> Tested-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-25ACPI suspend: build fix for ACPI_SLEEP=n && XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y.Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-23ACPI suspend: fix build warning when CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=nLen Brown1-1/+1
drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:27: warning: ‘acpi_target_sleep_state’ defined but not used Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'ull' into testLen Brown1-1/+1
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/bay.c drivers/acpi/dock.c drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'suspend' into testLen Brown1-1/+58
2008-10-22ACPI suspend: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependence and some compilation warningsRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+3
Initially CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined as CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION and some ACPI code, most importantly the code in drivers/acpi/main.c, was written with this assumption. Currently, however, CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is also set when CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE is set. This causes some compilation warnings to appear in drivers/acpi/main.c if both CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION are unset and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set (this was impossible before). To fix this problem, redefine CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP do depend directly on CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION, as originally intended, and use it instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/main.c, wherever appropriate. Additionally, move the acpi_target_sleep_state definition from under the #ifdef to prevent compilation from failing in some cases. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-16ACPI suspend: Blacklist HP xw4600 Workstation for old code orderingRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+8
HP xw4600 Workstation is known to require the "old" (ie. compatible with ACPI 1.0) suspend code ordering, so blacklist it for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: John Brown <john.brown3@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-16ACPI Suspend: Enable ACPI during resume if SCI_EN is not setRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
On some machines, like for example MSI Wind U100, the BIOS doesn't enable ACPI before returning control to the OS, which sometimes causes resume to fail. This is against the ACPI specification, which clearly states that "When the platform is waking from an S1, S2 or S3 state, OSPM assumes the hardware is already in the ACPI mode and will not issue an ACPI_ENABLE", but it won't hurt to check the SCI_EN bit and enable ACPI during resume from S3 if this bit is not set. Fortunately, we already have acpi_enable() for that, so use it in the resume code path, before executing _BFS, in analogy with the resume-from-hibernation code path. NOTE: We aren't supposed to set SCI_EN directly, because it's owned by the hardware. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-16ACPI: Add the support for _TTS objectZhao Yakui1-1/+48
The _TTS object is defined in the section 7.3 of acpi 3.0b spec. The _TTS control method is executed by the OSPM at the beginning of the sleep transition process for S1,S2, S3, S4, and orderly S5 shutdown. OS will invoke _TTS before it has notified any native mode device drivers of the sleep state transition. The target sleeping state value is passed to the _TTS control method. The _TTS control method is also executed by the OSPM at the end of any sleep transition process when the system transitions to S0 from S1, S2, S3, or S4. The _TTS object should be evaluated after it has notified any native mode device drivers of the end of the sleep state transition. The working state value (0) is passed to the _TTS control method. So it is necessary to add the support for _TTS object. The _TTS object will be evaluated if it exists. At the same time a block notifier is added to the reboot notifier list so that the _TTS object will also be evaluated when the system shutdown. lenb: note that as of Sep 2008, I've not yet seen _TTS in any shipping BIOS. So this patch is to future-proof Linux, rather than fix the installed base. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11132 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernelsMatthew Wilcox1-1/+1
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-24pm: acpi pm: add DMI quirk list for ACPI 1.0 suspend orderingCarlos Corbacho1-0/+20
There are a few BIOSes that we know of already that need to use the ACPI 1.0 suspend order. This appears to be only be a small minority of mostly nVidia based systems. Based on observation of Windows behaviour, it's clear that Windows is also doing maintaining its own list of broken hardware that needs this workaround. Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-24pm: acpi hibernation: utilize hardware signatureShaohua Li1-0/+22
ACPI defines a hardware signature. BIOS calculates the signature according to hardware configure and if hardware changes while hibernated, the signature will change. In that case, S4 resume should fail. Still, there may be systems on which this mechanism does not work correctly, so it is better to provide a workaround for them. For this reason, add a new switch to the acpi_sleep= command line argument allowing one to disable hardware signature checking. [shaohua.li@intel.com: build fix] Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-16Merge branch 'linux-next' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-113/+188
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/pci-2.6 * 'linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/pci-2.6: (72 commits) Revert "x86/PCI: ACPI based PCI gap calculation" PCI: remove unnecessary volatile in PCIe hotplug struct controller x86/PCI: ACPI based PCI gap calculation PCI: include linux/pm_wakeup.h for device_set_wakeup_capable PCI PM: Fix pci_prepare_to_sleep x86/PCI: Fix PCI config space for domains > 0 Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() by providing a stub for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n PCI: Simplify PCI device PM code PCI PM: Introduce pci_prepare_to_sleep and pci_back_from_sleep PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function PCI: rework pci_set_power_state function to call platform first PCI: Introduce platform_pci_power_manageable function ACPI: Introduce acpi_bus_power_manageable function PCI: make pci_name use dev_name PCI: handle pci_name() being const PCI: add stub for pci_set_consistent_dma_mask() PCI: remove unused arch pcibios_update_resource() functions PCI: fix pci_setup_device()'s sprinting into a const buffer ... Fixed up conflicts in various files (arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c, arch/x86/pci/irq.c, arch/x86/pci/pci.h, drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c, drivers/pci/pci.c, drivers/pci/pci.h, include/acpi/acpi_bus.h) from x86 and ACPI updates manually.
2008-07-16ACPI PM: Remove obsolete Toshiba workaroundRafael J. Wysocki1-31/+0
Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI PM: acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() cleanupDavid Brownell1-4/+4
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-07PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-upRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+25
* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-05x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resumeH. Peter Anvin1-3/+2
Some Dell laptops enter resume with apparent garbage in the segment descriptor registers (almost certainly the result of a botched transition from protected to real mode.) The only way to clean that up is to enter protected mode ourselves and clean out the descriptor registers. This fixes resume on Dell XPS M1210 and Dell D620. Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927 Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-12Suspend-related patches for 2.6.27Rafael J. Wysocki1-113/+163
ACPI PM: Add possibility to change suspend sequence There are some systems out there that don't work correctly with our current suspend/hibernation code ordering. Provide a workaround for these systems allowing them to pass 'acpi_sleep=old_ordering' in the kernel command line so that it will use the pre-ACPI 2.0 ("old") suspend code ordering. Unfortunately, this requires us to add a platform hook to the resuming of devices for recovering the platform in case one of the device drivers' .suspend() routines returns error code. Namely, ACPI 1.0 specifies that _PTS should be called before suspending devices, but _WAK still should be called before resuming them in order to undo the changes made by _PTS. However, if there is an error during suspending devices, they are automatically resumed without returning control to the PM core, so the _WAK has to be called from within device_resume() in that cases. The patch also reorders and refactors the ACPI suspend/hibernation code to avoid duplication as far as reasonably possible. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-06-11ACPI PM: Remove obsolete Toshiba workaroundRafael J. Wysocki1-31/+0
Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI PM: acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() cleanupDavid Brownell1-4/+4
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-04-29ACPI: re-name acpi_pm_ops to acpi_suspend_opsLen Brown1-21/+21
... as they are platform_suspend_ops after all. cosmetic re-name only, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-04-01ACPI PM: Restore the 2.6.24 suspend orderingRafael J. Wysocki1-57/+14
Some time ago it turned out that our suspend code ordering broke some NVidia-based systems that hung if _PTS was executed with one of the PCI devices, specifically a USB controller, in a low power state. Then, it was noticed that the suspend code ordering was not compliant with ACPI 1.0, although it was compliant with ACPI 2.0 (and later), and it was argued that the code had to be changed for that reason (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). So we did, but evidently we did wrong, because it's now turning out that some systems have been broken by this change. Refs: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217#c16 [ I said at that time that something like this might happend, but the majority of people involved thought that it was improbable due to the necessity to preserve the compliance of hardware with ACPI 1.0. ] This actually is a quite serious regression from 2.6.24. Moreover, the ACPI 1.0 ordering of suspend code introduced another issue that I have only noticed recently. Namely, if the suspend of one of devices fails, the already suspended devices will be resumed without executing _WAK before, which leads to problems on some systems (for example, in such situations thermal management is broken on my HP nx6325). Consequently, it also breaks suspend debugging on the affected systems. Note also, that the requirement to execute _PTS before suspending devices does not really make sense, because the device in question may be put into a low power state at run time for a reason unrelated to a system-wide suspend. For the reasons outlined above, the change of the suspend ordering should be reverted, which is done by the patch below. [ Felix Möller: "I am the reporter from the original Novell Bug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217 I just tried current git head (two hours ago) with the patch (the one from the beginning of this thread) from Rafael and without it. With the patch my MacBook does suspend without it does not." ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: Felix Möller <felix@derklecks.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-11ACPI: replace remaining __FUNCTION__ occurrencesHarvey Harrison1-1/+1
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'misc' and 'misc-2.6.25' into releaseLen Brown1-1/+1
2008-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' and 'battery' into ↵Len Brown1-3/+12
release
2008-02-07PM: documentation cleanupsPavel Machek1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Print message before calling _PTSRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+3
Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for debugging the suspend/hibernation code). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI hibernation: Call _PTS before suspending devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-11/+25
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI 2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel command line option. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01Hibernation: Introduce begin() and end() callbacksRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+12
Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI suspend: Call _PTS before suspending devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-13/+38
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI 2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command line option to override the default if need be. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from _PTSRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+15
The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before suspending devices. Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global control method should be executed before suspending devices, we need to disable GPEs separately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAKRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+7
The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up. Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01Suspend: Introduce begin() and end() callbacksRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+18
On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the suspend fails.  All platforms that use the .set_target() global suspend callback are affected by analogous issues. For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend is successful.  Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target() callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements). Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global suspend callback to .begin(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: clear GPE earily in resume to avoid warningShaohua Li1-0/+7
Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler. acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should do it before interrupt is re-enabled. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Fix mismerge in acpi_hibernation_finishRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+0
Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(), but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless). Remove it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-11ACPI: Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state()Rafael J. Wysocki1-3/+12
Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW is not present). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-25ACPI: suspend: Wrong order of GPE restore.Alexey Starikovskiy1-2/+2
acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device() is called. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-25ACPI: sleep: Fix GPE suspend cleanupAlexey Starikovskiy1-0/+1
Commit 9b039330808b83acac3597535da26f47ad1862ce removed acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(), the only function used at S5 transition Add call to generic acpi_enable_wake_device(). Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-19Merge branch 'release' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+5
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 * 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6: (41 commits) ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend ACPICA: hw: remove use_lock flag from acpi_hw_register_{read, write} ACPI: cpuidle: port idle timer suspend/resume workaround to cpuidle ACPI: clean up acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep Hibernation: Make sure that ACPI is enabled in acpi_hibernation_finish ACPI: suppress uninitialized var warning cpuidle: consolidate 2.6.22 cpuidle branch into one patch ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: skip blanks before the data when parsing sysfs ACPI: AC: Add sysfs interface ACPI: SBS: Add sysfs alarm ACPI: SBS: Add ACPI_PROCFS around procfs handling code. ACPI: SBS: Add support for power_supply class (and sysfs) ACPI: SBS: Make SBS reads table-driven. ACPI: SBS: Simplify data structures in SBS ACPI: SBS: Split host controller (ACPI0001) from SBS driver (ACPI0002) ACPI: EC: Add new query handler to list head. ACPI: Add acpi_bus_generate_event4() function ACPI: Battery: add sysfs alarm ACPI: Battery: Add sysfs support ACPI: Battery: Misc clean-ups, no functional changes ... Fix up conflicts in drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.[ch] manually
2007-10-18Hibernation: Check if ACPI is enabled during restore in the right placeRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+10
The following scenario leads to total confusion of the platform firmware on some boxes (eg. HPC nx6325): * Hibernate with ACPI enabled * Resume passing "acpi=off" to the boot kernel To prevent this from happening it's necessary to check if ACPI is enabled (and enable it if that's not the case) _right_ _after_ control has been transfered from the boot kernel to the image kernel, before device_power_up() is called (ie. with interrupts disabled).  Enabling ACPI after calling device_power_up() turns out to be insufficient. For this reason, introduce new hibernation callback ->leave() that will be executed before device_power_up() by the restored image kernel.  To make it work, it also is necessary to move swsusp_suspend() from swsusp.c to disk.c (it's name is changed to "create_image", which is more up to the point). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rename hibernation_ops to platform_hibernation_opsRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_ops' in analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_ops'. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rework struct hibernation_opsRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+11
During hibernation we also need to tell the ACPI core that we're going to put the system into the S4 sleep state. For this reason, an additional method in 'struct hibernation_ops' is needed, playing the role of set_target() in 'struct platform_suspend_operations'. Moreover, the role of the .prepare() method is now different, so it's better to introduce another method, that in general may be different from .prepare(), that will be used to prepare the platform for creating the hibernation image (.prepare() is used anyway to notify the platform that we're going to enter the low power state after the image has been saved). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rework struct platform_suspend_opsRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+2
There is no reason why the .prepare() and .finish() methods in 'struct platform_suspend_ops' should take any arguments, since architectures don't use these methods' argument in any practically meaningful way (ie. either the target system sleep state is conveyed to the platform by .set_target(), or there is only one suspend state supported and it is indicated to the PM core by .valid(), or .prepare() and .finish() aren't defined at all).  There also is no reason why .finish() should return any result. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rename struct pm_ops and related thingsRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+3
The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend.  Moreover, its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.  In that case, the name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of related functions should be changed accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-10Pull bugzilla-292300 into release branchLen Brown1-1/+0
2007-10-10Hibernation: Make sure that ACPI is enabled in acpi_hibernation_finishRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+5
If the BIOS does not enable ACPI and the "acpi=off" command line parameter is passed to the boot kernel, ACPI may be disabled when the (restored) image kernel attempts to execute acpi_hibernation_finish(). To prevent this from happening we can call acpi_enable() from acpi_hibernation_finish() (if ACPI is already enabled, this will have no effect). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-09drivers/firmware: const-ify DMI API and internalsJeff Garzik1-1/+1
Three main sets of changes: 1) dmi_get_system_info() return value should have been marked const, since callers should not be changing that data. 2) const-ify DMI internals, since DMI firmware tables should, whenever possible, be marked const to ensure we never ever write to that data area. 3) const-ify DMI API, to enable marking tables const where possible in low-level drivers. And if we're really lucky, this might enable some additional optimizations on the part of the compiler. The bulk of the changes are #2 and #3, which are interrelated. #1 could have been a separate patch, but it was so small compared to the others, it was easier to roll it into this changeset. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2007-09-27ACPI: Hibernate erroneously disabled Suspend wakeup devicesAlexey Starikovskiy1-1/+0
S4 suspend to disk will disable GPE's permanently because acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() does not have a counterpart at resume time. Thus, those devices became unavailable for wakeup from subsequent S3 suspend-to-ram. Here acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() is removed, and upon suspend acpi_enable_wakeup_device() gets its functionality. Upon resume, acpi_disable_wakeup_device() restores the state. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292300 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>