summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/blk-throttle.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-03-01blk-throttle: Do not use kblockd workqueue for throtl workVivek Goyal1-11/+18
o Dominik Klein reported a system hang issue while doing some blkio throttling testing. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/173 o Some tracing revealed that CFQ was not dispatching any more jobs as queue unplug was not happening. And queue unplug was not happening because unplug work was not being called as there was one throttling work on same cpu which as not finished yet. And throttling work had not finished as it was tyring to dispatch a bio to CFQ but all the request descriptors were consume to it was put to sleep. o So basically it is a cyclic dependecny between CFQ unplug work and throtl dispatch work. Tejun suggested that use separate workqueue for such cases. o This patch uses a separate workqueue for throttle related work and does not rely on kblockd workqueue anymore. Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: Dominik Klein <dk@in-telegence.net> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2011-01-19blkio-throttle: Avoid calling blkiocg_lookup_group() for root groupVivek Goyal1-1/+9
o Jeff Moyer was doing some testing on a RAM backed disk and blkiocg_lookup_group() showed up high overhead after memcpy(). Similarly somebody else reported that blkiocg_lookup_group() is eating 6% extra cpu. Though looking at the code I can't think why the overhead of this function is so high. One thing is that it is called with very high frequency (once for every IO). o For lot of folks blkio controller will be compiled in but they might not have actually created cgroups. Hence optimize the case of root cgroup where we can avoid calling blkiocg_lookup_group() if IO is happening in root group (common case). Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-12-01blk-throttle: Correct the placement of smp_rmb()Vivek Goyal1-14/+9
o I was discussing what are the variable being updated without spin lock and why do we need barriers and Oleg pointed out that location of smp_rmb() should be between read of td->limits_changed and tg->limits_changed. This patch fixes it. o Following is one possible sequence of events. Say cpu0 is executing throtl_update_blkio_group_read_bps() and cpu1 is executing throtl_process_limit_change(). cpu0 cpu1 tg->limits_changed = true; smp_mb__before_atomic_inc(); atomic_inc(&td->limits_changed); if (!atomic_read(&td->limits_changed)) return; if (tg->limits_changed) do_something; If cpu0 has updated tg->limits_changed and td->limits_changed, we want to make sure that if update to td->limits_changed is visible on cpu1, then update to tg->limits_changed should also be visible. Oleg pointed out to ensure that we need to insert an smp_rmb() between td->limits_changed read and tg->limits_changed read. o I had erroneously put smp_rmb() before atomic_read(&td->limits_changed). This patch fixes it. Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-12-01blk-throttle: Trim/adjust slice_end once a bio has been dispatchedVivek Goyal1-0/+16
o During some testing I did following and noticed throttling stops working. - Put a very low limit on a cgroup, say 1 byte per second. - Start some reads, this will set slice_end to a very high value. - Change the limit to higher value say 1MB/s - Now IO unthrottles and finishes as expected. - Try to do the read again but IO is not limited to 1MB/s as expected. o What is happening. - Initially low value of limit sets slice_end to a very high value. - During updation of limit, slice_end is not being truncated. - Very high value of slice_end leads to keeping the existing slice valid for a very long time and new slice does not start. - tg_may_dispatch() is called in blk_throtle_bio(), and trim_slice() is not called in this path. So slice_start is some old value and practically we are able to do huge amount of IO. o There are many ways it can be fixed. I have fixed it by trying to adjust/cleanup slice_end in trim_slice(). Generally we extend slices if bio is big and can't be dispatched in one slice. After dispatch of bio, readjust the slice_end to make sure we don't end up with huge values. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-11-15blk-throttle: Fix calculation of max number of WRITES to be dispatchedVivek Goyal1-1/+1
o Currently we try to dispatch more READS and less WRITES (75%, 25%) in one dispatch round. ummy pointed out that there is a bug in max_nr_writes calculation. This patch fixes it. Reported-by: ummy y <yummylln@yahoo.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-10-01blkio-throttle: Fix possible multiplication overflow in iops calculationsVivek Goyal1-1/+15
o User can specify max iops value of 32bit (UINT_MAX), through cgroup interface. If a user has specified say 4294967294 (UNIT_MAX - 2), then on 32bit platform, following multiplication can overflow. io_allowed = (tg->iops[rw] * jiffy_elapsed_rnd) o Explicitly cast the multiplication to 64bit and then perform division and then check whether result is still great then UNINT_MAX. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-10-01blkio-throttle: There is no need to convert jiffies to milli secondsVivek Goyal1-4/+3
o Do not convert jiffies to mili seconds as it is not required. Just work with jiffies and HZ. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-10-01blkio-throttle: Fix link failure failure on i386Vivek Goyal1-6/+10
o Randy Dunlap reported following linux-next failure. This patch fixes it. on i386: blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1abb8): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1b1dc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' o bytes_per_second interface is 64bit and I was continuing to do 64 bit division even on 32bit platform without help of special macros/functions hence the failure. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-10-01blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit changeVivek Goyal1-18/+116
o Currently any cgroup throttle limit changes are processed asynchronousy and the change does not take affect till a new bio is dispatched from same group. o It might happen that a user sets a redicuously low limit on throttling. Say 1 bytes per second on reads. In such cases simple operations like mount a disk can wait for a very long time. o Once bio is throttled, there is no easy way to come out of that wait even if user increases the read limit later. o This patch fixes it. Now if a user changes the cgroup limits, we recalculate the bio dispatch time according to new limits. o Can't take queueu lock under blkcg_lock, hence after the change I wake up the dispatch thread again which recalculates the time. So there are some variables being synchronized across two threads without lock and I had to make use of barriers. Hoping I have used barriers correctly. Any review of memory barrier code especially will help. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-10-01blkio: Add root group to td->tg_listVivek Goyal1-4/+13
o Currently all the dynamically allocated groups, except root grp is added to td->tg_list. This was not a problem so far but in next patch I will travel through td->tg_list to process any updates of limits on the group. If root group is not in tg_list, then root group's updates are not processed. o It is better to root group also to tg_list instead of doing special processing for it during limit updates. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-09-16blkio: Implementation of IOPS limit logicVivek Goyal1-37/+127
o core logic of implementing IOPS throttling. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
2010-09-16blkio: Core implementation of throttle policyVivek Goyal1-0/+909
o Actual implementation of throttling policy in block layer. Currently it implements READ and WRITE bytes per second throttling logic. IOPS throttling comes in later patches. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>