| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Janusz Krzysztofik reported the following build break on OMAP1 builds that
don't include CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/arm/mach-omap1/built-in.o: In function `omap1_usb_init':
lcd_dma.c:(.init.text+0x1420): undefined reference to `ocpi_enable'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
This was caused by commit d3645d39ad0ed9f09535065676ea0ba114f93cdf
("ARM: OMAP1: OHCI: use platform_data fn ptr to enable OCPI bus").
Fix by declaring an empty ocpi_enable() on non-16XX builds, which
should work until the OCPI code is moved out to drivers/.
Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
The H2, H3, Perseus2, and FSample board files all contain the same
duplicated code to handle NAND commands. That code is missing
some casts around conversions from unsigned long to void __iomem *.
Consolidate the duplicated code into a new file,
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-nand.c. Resolve the sparse warnings by
adding appropriate casts:
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h2.c:193:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h2.c:193:9: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h2.c:193:9: got unsigned long
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-perseus2.c:157:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-perseus2.c:157:9: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-perseus2.c:157:9: got unsigned long
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-fsample.c:199:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-fsample.c:199:9: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-fsample.c:199:9: got unsigned long
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h3.c:195:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h3.c:195:9: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-h3.c:195:9: got unsigned long
Thanks to Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for suggesting a cleaner
implementation of omap1_nand_cmd_ctl(), avoiding some casts.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@nokia.com>
Cc: Greg Lonnon <glonnon@ridgerun.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <kjh@hilman.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Move the OMAP1 OCPI "bus" code to arch/arm/mach-omap1, since it is
only used on OMAP1 devices. In the long term, it probably makes sense
to move the OCPI bus code to somewhere under drivers/.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Several C files in arch/arm/mach-omap* and arch/arm/plat-omap declare
functions that are used by other files, but don't include the header
file where the prototype is declared. This results in the following
warnings from sparse:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:114:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_pending' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:186:13: warning: symbol 'omap2_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:191:13: warning: symbol 'omap3_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:196:13: warning: symbol 'ti81xx_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:233:39: warning: symbol 'omap2_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:242:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:265:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:291:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_prepare_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:306:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_resume_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:312:39: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:59:12: warning: symbol 'omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-display.c:133:13: warning: symbol 'zoom_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:73:13: warning: symbol 'omap_init_consistent_dma_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_flags' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:179:13: warning: symbol 'omap1_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/reset.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'omap1_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fix by including the appropriate header files.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy <svadivu@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
|
|
We don't want to keep it in io.h as we want to remove io.h
for omap2+ for the common zImage support.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather
than using arch_reset().
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers.
Add mach-omap1/common.h and mach-omap2/common.h and move the
local prototypes there from plat/common.h and mach/omap4-common.h.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
