diff options
| author | Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> | 2007-12-13 11:28:43 -0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-01-28 14:57:45 -0800 |
| commit | 69567d0b63b7f4ffeb53fe746c87bd6efe1c284b (patch) | |
| tree | d2ce8ff37ecc6481684cddd386bc302f47a0a468 /net/dccp/input.c | |
| parent | 96eba69dbac767f4e287df39e6fa489d37f1aa7b (diff) | |
| download | linux-3.10-69567d0b63b7f4ffeb53fe746c87bd6efe1c284b.tar.gz linux-3.10-69567d0b63b7f4ffeb53fe746c87bd6efe1c284b.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-69567d0b63b7f4ffeb53fe746c87bd6efe1c284b.zip | |
[DCCP]: Perform SHUT_RD and SHUT_WR on receiving close
This patch performs two changes:
1) Close the write-end in addition to the read-end when a fin-like segment
(Close or CloseReq) is received by DCCP. This accounts for the fact that DCCP,
in contrast to TCP, does not have a half-close. RFC 4340 says in this respect
that when a fin-like segment has been sent there is no guarantee at all that
any further data will be processed.
Thus this patch performs SHUT_WR in addition to the SHUT_RD when a fin-like
segment is encountered.
2) Minor change: I noted that code appears twice in different places and think it
makes sense to put this into a self-contained function (dccp_enqueue()).
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dccp/input.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/dccp/input.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/input.c b/net/dccp/input.c index decf2f21149..dacd4fd3c63 100644 --- a/net/dccp/input.c +++ b/net/dccp/input.c @@ -22,16 +22,27 @@ /* rate-limit for syncs in reply to sequence-invalid packets; RFC 4340, 7.5.4 */ int sysctl_dccp_sync_ratelimit __read_mostly = HZ / 8; -static void dccp_fin(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) +static void dccp_enqueue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { - sk->sk_shutdown |= RCV_SHUTDOWN; - sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE); __skb_pull(skb, dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_doff * 4); __skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb); skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk); sk->sk_data_ready(sk, 0); } +static void dccp_fin(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + /* + * On receiving Close/CloseReq, both RD/WR shutdown are performed. + * RFC 4340, 8.3 says that we MAY send further Data/DataAcks after + * receiving the closing segment, but there is no guarantee that such + * data will be processed at all. + */ + sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK; + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE); + dccp_enqueue_skb(sk, skb); +} + static int dccp_rcv_close(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { int queued = 0; @@ -282,10 +293,7 @@ static int __dccp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, * - sk_shutdown == RCV_SHUTDOWN, use Code 1, "Not Listening" * - sk_receive_queue is full, use Code 2, "Receive Buffer" */ - __skb_pull(skb, dh->dccph_doff * 4); - __skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb); - skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk); - sk->sk_data_ready(sk, 0); + dccp_enqueue_skb(sk, skb); return 0; case DCCP_PKT_ACK: goto discard; |