summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>2014-01-21 23:50:01 (GMT)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2014-10-05 21:54:15 (GMT)
commitd081edee3aa2695765ff836197846b89ab712b05 (patch)
tree72cacca2ea861d3ee6bf17be6bd51ce7296c3470 /mm
parenta214c050ee476860bccfef17e24028b9a0750360 (diff)
downloadlinux-3.10-d081edee3aa2695765ff836197846b89ab712b05.zip
linux-3.10-d081edee3aa2695765ff836197846b89ab712b05.tar.gz
linux-3.10-d081edee3aa2695765ff836197846b89ab712b05.tar.bz2
oom_kill: add rcu_read_lock() into find_lock_task_mm()
commit 4d4048be8a93769350efa31d2482a038b7de73d0 upstream. find_lock_task_mm() expects it is called under rcu or tasklist lock, but it seems that at least oom_unkillable_task()->task_in_mem_cgroup() and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()->oom_badness() can call it lockless. Perhaps we could fix the callers, but this patch simply adds rcu lock into find_lock_task_mm(). This also allows to simplify a bit one of its callers, oom_kill_process(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com> Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org> Cc: "Ma, Xindong" <xindong.ma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: "Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@intel.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/oom_kill.c12
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 4f584d4..8e40908 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -102,14 +102,19 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct task_struct *t;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
for_each_thread(p, t) {
task_lock(t);
if (likely(t->mm))
- return t;
+ goto found;
task_unlock(t);
}
+ t = NULL;
+found:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- return NULL;
+ return t;
}
/* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
@@ -461,10 +466,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
if (!p) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
put_task_struct(victim);
return;
} else if (victim != p) {
@@ -490,6 +493,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
* That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
* pending fatal signal.
*/
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(p)
if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {